Don't! She'll accidentally blow up that nuclear power plant, blame it on Russia and start ww3hmm has Truss booked a ticket to Kiev to piss around playing dress up in a tank yet
if she wasn't a tory piece of shit I'd feel sorry for her
Tbf, you are completely correct. The fall in the pond makes it cheaper for US companies and private equity to buy up UK businesses.good exchange rate tbf
it is very fortunate for us that Trump isnt in the white house right now...the next Tory-Republican alignment is going to be savageTbf, you are completely correct. The fall in the pond makes it cheaper for US companies and private equity to buy up UK businesses.
Of course, Truss will frame that as “investment” in the UK, whereas what is really happening is that the country is being sold off on the cheap.
I await more signs that the Truss Fundies are revolting.THe way things are going - i.e. the small matter of a completely self inflicted economic meltdown - I think tory mps chucking out truss and replacing her with Sunak in a coup is well within the bounds of possibility.
Where the fuck is she btw?
Has there ever been a more spectacular political self immolation?
Truss Fundies
THe way things are going - i.e. the small matter of a completely self inflicted economic meltdown - I think tory mps chucking out truss and replacing her with Sunak in a coup is well within the bounds of possibility.
Where the fuck is she btw?
Has there ever been a more spectacular political self immolation?
makes it so much easier when it comes to selling the nhsThe fall in the pond makes it cheaper for US companies and private equity to buy up UK businesses.
And, as a matter of interest, why would you make that particular distinction at this present time?I actually would say that the fault there is with the design of the bell-stand rather than Liz Truss.
It would be quite amusing if Truss were to throw Kwarteng under the bus and attempt to carry on as if he had just gone rogue or something.I mean it would be a desperate strategy but I expect she could manage it.
Sadly not being lt for the next few months,barring truss losing her nerve, is of no importance whatsoeverIt's worth noting that she's having it easy at the moment in terms of the dead sheep attacks that starmer is launching (while Labour have until very recently also still been obsessed with de-Corbynification). John Smith would have destroyed her in Parliament and, heresy though it is to say it, Blair would too. The mixture of his smug but effective oratory and Alistair Campbell's attack dog would have worked as a media strategy. I know many people overestimate the effectiveness of the Labour machine in that period, but there was more of a sense of the (yuk) product being sold, replete with all the snake oil needed to get us to part with our money. Heresy ends.
Maybe though, starmer's moment has come in the sense that this crisis has created a space for someone 'dull but not liz truss'. I still think Labour will need to do more to establish an identity, but for the next few months 'not being liz truss' is quite enough.
I notice the guardian are getting feverish about 'letters going in to the 1922' which was one of their obsessions throughout johnson's clusterfuck on stilts. Even though tory mps have the morals not just of the rats fleeing a sinking ship, they are more like the fleas deserting the rats, don't see anything like a challenge happening. They are stuck with her. Unfortunately, we are stuck with the consequences.Sadly not being lt for the next few months,barring truss losing her nerve, is of no importance whatsoever
There is no way sufficient mps would support a no-confidence vote. The phrase doing the rounds is 'always keep a hold of nurse for fear of finding something worse', and believe you me several names spring to mind who would be even worse than la trussI notice the guardian are getting feverish about 'letters going in to the 1922' which was one of their obsessions throughout johnson's clusterfuck on stilts. Even though tory mps have the morals not just of the rats fleeing a sinking ship, they are more like the fleas deserting the rats, don't see anything like a challenge happening. They are stuck with her. Unfortunately, we are stuck with the consequences.
True, but important to remember that they wanted Sunak not Truss.There is no way sufficient mps would support a no-confidence vote. The phrase doing the rounds is 'always keep a hold of nurse for fear of finding something worse', and believe you me several names spring to mind who would be even worse than la truss
I notice the guardian are getting feverish about 'letters going in to the 1922' which was one of their obsessions throughout johnson's clusterfuck on stilts. Even though tory mps have the morals not just of the rats fleeing a sinking ship, they are more like the fleas deserting the rats, don't see anything like a challenge happening. They are stuck with her. Unfortunately, we are stuck with the consequences.
I don't suppose even the Tory geriatric membership are that keen on her any moreTrue, but important to remember that they wanted Sunak not Truss.
Thick greedy fuckers deserve to die of shock, tbhI don't suppose even the Tory geriatric membership are that keen on her any more
Too good for themThick greedy fuckers deserve to die of shock, tbh
Running the leadership again at any point before the next election makes them look like a skip fire on steroids, a box of frogs where the frogs have all brought their mates. Letting this unroll with PM and Chancellor remaining in post fucks them over economic competency and almost certainly brings kieth in as the next fucking useless PM. Ironically, both of those options probably deliver on both of those consequences.True, but important to remember that they wanted Sunak not Truss.