You wouldn't say that if it was from a paper that backed your point of view. The actual source is the NHS information centre.
Lib Dem Polls - How Low Can They Go?
- Thread starter the button
- Start date
You wouldn't say that if it was from a paper that backed your point of view. The actual source is the NHS information centre.
_angel_
.
Tough shit because that is exactly what the country will and is doing.
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
It is basically a system which allows workers to be brought here from other countries, including those outside the EU and paid on the wage rates of their country of origin. It is not covered by immigration law and they have almost no rights because it is seen as "temporary labour movements" rather than immigration. And I know this was going on under a Labour government, but my point is that there is not enough scaremongering, not enough awareness that these horrors are going on, even among the far left (this weekend was the first i herad of it)
http://www.caef.org.uk/d119ldr.htm
http://www.caef.org.uk/d119ldr.htm
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
What is the NHS information centre?
And yes I would. If I was trying to promote how great my party was I wouldn't post something up from its paper and call you a loon when you didn't believe it.
Refused as fuck
"ethnic pakistani tosser"
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Given that the Spectator is basically your party's paper as well now.
Yes, and people like myself need to try and ensure the Lib Dems hold the Tories to account over NHS job loses in front-line services.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
Yes,it does.They've shown which side they're on
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
You've changed your tune...AGAIN!
Refused as fuck
"ethnic pakistani tosser"
Either dangerously thick or a shameless liar or both.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
He's basically spinning (badly) for people who are hellbent on shafting himYou thick bastard.
Refused as fuck
"ethnic pakistani tosser"
Is moon23 actually Shevek's partner?
Kaka Tim
Half Arsed and Slapdash till I Die
Moon - your just a spam artist for your shitty little mini-me tory party.
Whatever their policies, you would be aruging the case on here, repeating whatever distortions, platitudes and stock answers are being churned out by the lib-dem spin machine. You are not in the business of debate - your just some wanner-be party hack - a pathetic little slime machine.
Try the Guardian Comment if Free pages - plenty of your fellow hacks on there, please refarin from spamming up these boards any more.
Whatever their policies, you would be aruging the case on here, repeating whatever distortions, platitudes and stock answers are being churned out by the lib-dem spin machine. You are not in the business of debate - your just some wanner-be party hack - a pathetic little slime machine.
Try the Guardian Comment if Free pages - plenty of your fellow hacks on there, please refarin from spamming up these boards any more.
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Name one, recently. Don't try to defend them at the same time btw.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
So, no privatisations or quasi-privatisations on the go? No contracts being signed where the public gets a lousy deal? No rolling back of the welfare state for putatively economic reasons that are in actuality ideological reasons?
No bad decisions by the current government that have had the effect of lengthening and/or worsening the current economic phase? No deliberate limitation of publicity on any fiscal strengthening brought about by the last government?
You really are economically and politically illiterate, aren't you?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
You hold the balance of power, so it's perfectly reasonable to presume that without Lib-Dem acquiescence, the cuts can't go through.
No, I didn't do that, I pointed out the actuality of the instances you cited, rather than the fantasy versions you proffered.
I'm not trying to.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
HUH??No, they certainly don't!-unless a govt has a deflationary economic policy.
Like the condems do
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
The St George's healthcare trust in Tooting, down the road from Brixton, has had to shed just under a thousand jobs in the last couple of months due to the nature of spending "ring-fencing" turning out to be mythical. This is going to be repeated in just about every trust. If we're lucky only 50,000 jobs will be lost.
So stick your pontificating claims that 50,000 job losses is "scare-mongering", you greasy-arseholed ignoramus.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Mmmm, but no attribution of where the specific data came from/where/what the NHS compiled the data from, either on the Speccy website, or in the article.
Oh, and the chart comes from an article, NOT from a paper. Big difference.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
it's the NHS's central data collection bureau.
Even if the Lib Dems had tried to secure some rainbow alliance with Labour then we would be looking at implementing Darling's economic plan that involved £14Bn of cuts, only £2Bn less then the coalition.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Don't do that then. You had that option. But you chose not to take it because your party supports these cuts and these cuts now. Despite it spitting in the face of those who voted for you on he basis of your manifesto which said the exact opposite. You wonder why people hate politicians? You fucking rat.
I've been a member of this board for a few years, hardly just a spam artist.
Not really, I spend just as much effort debating with people within the Lib Dems, trying to get them to be more liberal.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Please please more liberal whilst you attack the poorest and the very fundamentals of society.
You pointless wretch.
Similar threads
