Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Legitimate criticism of Islam

Article 18.
  • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Declaration of human rights....

Fine as far as it goes, but it only goes as far as individual governments and pwer structures allow it to.
 
And a good way to reach a position where informed social criticism is widespread is to encourage people to question authority rather than to defer to it. To challenge rather than to meekly accept.

And to do so repeatedly, as a "right" is worthless of you don't exercise it.
 
Many self-defined strict Muslims. As I understand it, one Muslim isn't supposed to judge how much of a believer another is, because that's supposed to be something which Allah alone can decide.

Although such varied luminaries as Mullah Omar and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini would disagree, and pretend to (always without suggesting it themselves, naturally!) prophetship in order to give validation to their perversions.
 
State licensed dissent ffs

Man goes into Post Office:
"One dissent licence, please!".
"I'm sorry sir, I can't sell you that."
"Why not, you cunt?"
"Ooh, dissenting against the state without a licence! I'll have to report you for that, sir!".

Except it'd be worse than that.
 
Islam is coopted to justify those regional perversions, though, and you can say that within the teachings of Islam, there is plenty that can be used to justify them. And there are some common threads - the structurally subordinate position of women, for instance, which it shares with most versions of Christianity.
Depends what you mean by "teachings".
If we're talking strictly the Koran and the hadith, then not so much. If we're talking those plus 14 centuries of Islamic jurisprudence based as much on cultural practice as the words in the original scripture, then that's where a lot of the perversion comes from, and none of the Islamic cults and sects are blameless here. As always, when politics enters into belief, all sorts of foul-smelling shit results.
 
For a thread about the legitimate criticism of Islam, there has been precious little legitimate or illegitimate criticism on display so far. How about I make a start, the idea of martyrdom seems very suspect to me, Christianity does not have it, atheists certainly don't have it, why does Islam even need it?

Christianity has had a culture of martyrdom since inception. It's based on the martyrdom of a single man for the supposed sake of the whole of humankind. Christians still martyr themselves for their beliefs, just as non-believers do (you're aware that the PLO was a secular organisation, I take it?).
 
Christianity has had a culture of martyrdom since inception. It's based on the martyrdom of a single man for the supposed sake of the whole of humankind. Christians still martyr themselves for their beliefs, just as non-believers do (you're aware that the PLO was a secular organisation, I take it?).
Yes, martyrdom in that way I agree exists in Christianity (my mistake for not thinking about that) I was reading up on it just now [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_martyrs ] , but I don't hear it being used today as a Christian recruiting tool to bring young people to war like it does within Islam and their virgins where you always hear of recruitment pressures, come and be a martyr, or this or that martyrdom operation etc.
 
Now Picky go and learn a bit about the history of the rc church.
I don't subscribe to nastiness anywhere and I don't support evil. And by heck there are some very evil people in every walk of life including religious life.
But the message of Jesus is as revolutionary as it was 2000 years ago.
Non violence.
Love.
Peace.
 
But the message of Jesus is as revolutionary as it was 2000 years ago.
Non violence.
Love.
Peace.

They'll be saying exactly that about the new messiah in 2000 years....
38975a.jpg


but we all know he's a very naughty boy ;)


Jesus:D FFS:rolleyes:
 
Now Picky go and learn a bit about the history of the rc church.
I don't subscribe to nastiness anywhere and I don't support evil. And by heck there are some very evil people in every walk of life including religious life.
But the message of Jesus is as revolutionary as it was 2000 years ago.
Non violence.
Love.
Peace.
it's a pity then that all christians say a variation of that and after 2000 years the line's wearing somewhat thin. strange how it's always the OTHER christians who have it arse over tit.
 
Non violence? Peace? Why don't all of us hold hands and sing kum bah yah while we're about it?
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword."
Matthew 10:34

Anyway, why has this thread become about Christianity instead of Islam?
 
.. Anyway, why has this thread become about Christianity instead of Islam?
Possibly because like me most are more comfortable criticizing Christianity perhaps because they don't know much about Islam (I certainly don't) or perhaps because they fear a Rushdie style fatwa!
 
Back
Top Bottom