Little interest for Ashcroft...and he may well still be recuperating?no-one has commissioned, presumably.
It 'goes with the territory' for "one-nation conservative" types. The tend to imagine that they do speak for the country.Have you ever read Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communities? You can't claim to speak for the entire country.
ROTHERHAM MOMENTUM MEETING 7pm TUESDAY 1st DECEMBER
Posted on November 29, 2015 by rothpol
ROTHERHAM MOMENTUM MEETING
7pm TUESDAY 1st DECEMBER
UNITY CENTRE, ST. LEONARDS ROAD. ROTHERHAM
The Blairites have a new leader: David Cameron. It is clear that these parasites would sooner see Labour lose the next election rather than have it win under Corbyn. The attacks on him in the Tory press and media by these cretins is reaching epidemic proportions. They would clearly take any steps to discredit the democratically elected leader and return the party safe for the Tories and their friends in the City. He won the leadership under a voting procedure that the Blairites brought in themselves under the Collins review. That is a measure of the contempt they have for democracy!
The division is clear: it’s either the Parliamentary MP’s – many of them parachuted in to safe Labour seats, and the majority of them never done a day’s work in their life – who run the Party, or it’s grass roots members. It is them or us. Come and join the campaign to defend Corbyn.
All members and supporters of the Labour Party welcome.
Dave Platts
Personal capacity
LOL! Stop yer whining, 'Cassandra'.I am not sure why you shoot the messenger, i am sure your experiences of them have been positive..
Barmy quote from a Labour MP on the lunchtime news; in the context of 75% of party members being opposed to bombing, the honourable member said they'd be voting in favour and 'wouldn't be bullied by anyone'.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
p.s. the MP is Angela Smith who has a record of solid yes voting for the renewal of trident and supported both the imposition of 'no fly' in Libya and air strikes in Iraq.
Party democracy but also coherence in policy.
It seems to me - no fan of the bombers myself - that Corbyn is hamstrung by the fact that he apparently lacks sufficient allies in the parliamentary LP, and the ones he does have like Abbot and McDonnell (sp?) seem a bit weak, to say the least. As a tactician, unless he is going to spring a surprise and I can't see it, he seems a bit poor. Even the lack of reply to all the abuse he has received. Him and his crew don't appear to be savvy operators at all.
If those stupid fucks put half as much energy into opposing this cunting gvt as they are trying to knife their leader this country would be in a far better place.
they do think long term, and as the party of a vehicle of social change. just change in the opposite direction we'd like.I'd venture the opinion that "him and his crew" are doing something that doesn't even occur to the assorted Blairites, Progressites and soi-disant "moderates" - thinking long-term, and thinking about the party as a vehicle for social change, rather than a vehicle for their own advancement.
Looks like there will be a free vote over Syria, probably a good idea tactically as I doubt that the leadership would be able to successfully whip sufficient numbers who would otherwise back airstrikes or abstain.
No they won't.All unattributed sources saying Corbyn said this or did that need to be digested in knowledge that he will be being targetted by at least CIA and MI5.
Amusing how easily the RW commentariat vacillate from "Corbyn the disastrous leader" to "Corbyn the too-clever-by-half/cunning plotter leader" memes.
it was also about digging himself out of a hole.
you'll remember all the way back to the weekend where the sainted one was telling all and sundry that it was the leaders decision on whipping? well, some devious soul did the Machiavellian thing and read the LP rules on whipping - which make it very clear that its the Shadow Cabinet that decide on whipping, not the leader... that, possibly, might just have got a bit embarrassing.
obviously, Jeremy can be forgiven for not knowing much about the Labour party whip...
"A decision of the Shadow Cabinet" that would be um, very much like something the shadow cabinet decidesthat doesn't say that the shadow cabinet decides though.