Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

832502b2-de99-41a2-8320-de2e139321bc-1020x612.jpeg


There's the Ed Stone!
 
Do expound.

On his watch lots of activists were convicted unlawfully because undercover pigs were allowed to withhold key evidence. Starmer's inquiry found no grounds for disciplinary action against anyone involved in the stitch-up.

e2a: Although I guess being in charge of a corrupt organisation doesn't really count as 'dirt' these days. If he'd had a spliff at his cousin's wedding reception though, that would be a different matter altogether.
 
This isn't just silly season stuff, it's flies on shit shaking their heads in disbelief:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1616165061959015/members/

"I have to say I had no idea that a men with such credentials was part of the Labour Party. I would join the Labour Party if he were leader. Now I see why he was put to stand against Natalie Bennet. Amazing, please run!
"
 
I suppose it depends what this scandal is (and which paper it appears in), but I doubt that this is the establishment playing at being gatekeeper - Umunna was probably intended to be the establishment candidate.
yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itself
 
yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itself
It would be, but probably the bit we're least likely to find out about.
 
yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itself


Thing is, if there was a Tory agenda at work this would have happened pre-election. It can only be internecine.
 
"Break clause" leader; that's a new one on me. Sounds a bit like 'caretaker' really? Seems to have quite a few pitfalls, and only really one advantage. What a pickle.

...an idea is rapidly gaining ground in the party of having a “break clause” in 2017 or 2018, after the EU Referendum. All it would take right, now, according to a senior member of the Shadow Cabinet, is for one of the leadership contenders to offer right now, that if he or she is elected, to put themselves up for a genuine re-election in two or three years time – a review moment, an opportunity for the party to renew their contract as it were, or to seek an alternative.
Hmmm
 
Andy Burnham.

Sounds slightly Northern, appears not too Metropolitan Elite-like, sometimes even sounds a bit normal humanoidish!

Plus will sound massively boring and even more bland as a leadership candidate.

Got to be a win win Shirley? :hmm:

;)
 
Back
Top Bottom