Just saw this on the Guardian feed
"Plus if Chuka does run for the mayoralty against Sadiq it will provide the press with endless Chuka/Khan headlines."
That's from up and coming Mark Wallace, see our Libertarians thread.
Just saw this on the Guardian feed
"Plus if Chuka does run for the mayoralty against Sadiq it will provide the press with endless Chuka/Khan headlines."
It's Chaka anyway...so how could such a headline be remotely funny?That's from up and coming Mark Wallace, see our Libertarians thread.
But sources close to Murdoch are 'letting it be known' that they have absolutely nothing on Abbott. She's clear to go.There's plenty of muck on Keir Starmer out there
"It went crazy last night on Facebook after we launched – 180 or so joined in a matter of hours"
Looks like a bit of hint?Why the ?
Do expound.
The Blairites are back. But if Labour falls to them, the party may as well give up
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/15/blairites-new-labour-aspiration
Vote labour without illusions. As you know fine well.Owen's counsel of despair, wonder what he would do in the event of another Blairite Coup?
yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itselfI suppose it depends what this scandal is (and which paper it appears in), but I doubt that this is the establishment playing at being gatekeeper - Umunna was probably intended to be the establishment candidate.
It would be, but probably the bit we're least likely to find out about.yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itself
depends on the story though ~ sometimes there's a clear source to them ~ especially so in kiss and tellsIt would be, but probably the bit we're least likely to find out about.
maybe...but this already has a very murky feel to it...just a hunch, mind.depends on the story though ~ sometimes there's a clear source to them ~ especially so in kiss and tells
agreedmaybe...but this already has a very murky feel to it...just a hunch, mind.
yeah lets wait and see - the story could come from a labour candidate competitor, from a worried tory source, but it could just as easily have come from a spooks file ~ whatever it is, im just saying that is more interesting than the story itself
...an idea is rapidly gaining ground in the party of having a “break clause” in 2017 or 2018, after the EU Referendum. All it would take right, now, according to a senior member of the Shadow Cabinet, is for one of the leadership contenders to offer right now, that if he or she is elected, to put themselves up for a genuine re-election in two or three years time – a review moment, an opportunity for the party to renew their contract as it were, or to seek an alternative.
Maybe that's the reason Chuka Umunna withdrew his candidacy...."Break clause" leader; that's a new one on me. Sounds a bit like 'caretaker' really? Seems to have quite a few pitfalls, and only really one advantage. What a pickle.
Hmmm