Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

If you want to write off the millions of people who didn't vote for something even vaguely progressive last week that's up to you

Fuck off. The DM is a disgusting rag and would itself 'write me off' on at least half a dozen different levels. I completely agree with emanymton that it reflects badly on someone if it's their announcement vessel of choice.
 
which goes back to electoral realities. If Labour alienates the Scared Bigots they lose, if they appeal to them they might stand a chance. Some sort of alternative strategy- nakedly leftist social cohesion and solidarity- is an act of faith that hasn't been tried in generations because none of the strategists think it would be successful. The mild stuff Red Ed managed, was savaged for and then failed with, tends to give credence to that.

No inspirational leftist is going to appear, win the ballot and then lead Labour to victory in the next election. Trying to re-establish credibility with the Scared Bigot vote is about the only thing the candidates can aspire to. :(
 
If there is one thing that Labour have failed most at, it is in setting the direction of debate. All they seem to do is attempt to reflect what they see as the political mood at any given time, not realising that as a national political party they have the power to influence what the mood is. The result is that the narrative is shaped by the right, who understand fully the need to mould political opinion. That is why their next leader will just be a nodding donkey for middle England.
 
If there is one thing that Labour have failed most at, it is in setting the direction of debate. All they seem to do is attempt to reflect what they see as the political mood at any given time, not realising that as a national political party they have the power to influence what the mood is. The result is that the narrative is shaped by the right, who understand fully the need to mould political opinion. That is why their next leader will just be a nodding donkey for middle England.

Blair and Campbell and Mandelson understood it well enough, I think, and it showed: the only time [e2a: meant this in reference to late 90s] in my memory when the people in charge of Labour (and of course govt) actually looked like they were in charge and knew it. If you took that and allied it to a few, you know, principles, it could be pretty persuasive stuff.
 
Last edited:
This is an interesting development....

23m ago10:10

Here is the complete text of the letter from first-time Labour MPs setting out their hopes for the Labour leadership (see 9.51)

Having arrived in Westminster as newly-elected Labour MPs after speaking to tens of thousands of voters during our election campaigns, we know how important it is for the future of our Party to move forward with an agenda that best serves the everyday needs of people, families and communities and that is prepared to challenge the notion of austerity and invest in public services.

Labour must now reach out to the five million voters lost since 1997, and those who moved away from Labour in Scotland and elsewhere on 7 May, renewing their hope that politics does matter and Labour is on their side.

As we seek a new leader of the Labour Party, we are needing one who looks forward and will challenge an agenda of cuts, take on the powerful vested interests of big business and will set out an alternative to austerity – not one who will draw back to the ‘New Labour’ creed of the past.

Now is the time Labour needs a leader who’s in tune with the collective aspiration of ordinary people and communities across Britain, meeting the need for secure employment paying decent wages, homes that people can call their own, strong public services back in public hands again and the guarantee of a real apprenticeship or university course with a job at the end of it. From restoring Sure Start to providing dignity and a good standard of living in retirement, these are the aspirations key to real Labour values today and will re-engage people across our country in the years to come.

We look forward to engaging in the debate surrounding the Labour leadership in the weeks ahead to secure our Party as being best able to meet the challenges faced by ordinary people at this time.


Signed:

  • Richard Burgon (Leeds East)
  • Louise Haigh (Sheffield Heeley)
  • Harry Harpham (Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough)
  • Imran Hussain (Bradford East)
  • Clive Lewis (Norwich South)
  • Rebecca Long Bailey (Salford and Eccles)
  • Rachael Maskell (York Central)
  • Kate Osamor (Edmonton)
  • Cat Smith (Lancaster and Fleetwood)
  • Jo Stevens (Cardiff Central)
Well done newbies.​
 
So whats his game then? Perhaps he's weighing up the possibility of him not pulling it off in 5 years and deciding the long game may be better now he's got the score on what the bookies reckon to his leadership chances.

I was kinda of hoping for a Umunna, Watson and Cooper as shadow chancellor setup. Not sure who I'd favour between Cooper or Burnham now TBH.
 

Perhaps his judgement is that the next election isn't winnable (as a majority?).

So whats his game then? Perhaps he's weighing up the possibility of him not pulling it off in 5 years and deciding the long game may be better now he's got the score on what the bookies reckon to his leadership chances.

I was kinda of hoping for a Umunna, Watson and Cooper as shadow chancellor setup. Not sure who I'd favour between Cooper or Burnham now TBH.


From the man himself; after talking about the pressure and scrutiny of being a leadership candidate:

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Fuck off. The DM is a disgusting rag and would itself 'write me off' on at least half a dozen different levels. I completely agree with emanymton that it reflects badly on someone if it's their announcement vessel of choice.
My parents are Daily Mail readers and disillusioned Labour supporters who have voted socialist before and UKIP at different times, they're not scared bigots.

I talk to Daily Mail and Sun readers most days who don't seem to have very different opinions to Mirror readers and definitely are nicer people than the sort of wankers who comment on Guardian articles - would you think more of her of she did a CIF piece?
 
Got to be some sunday paper scandal - i.e behavior the Daily mail does not approve of. In some ways i hope its something properly wrong then we can enjoy his departure without being associated with biblical morality bullshit.
 
Got to be some sunday paper scandal - i.e behavior the Daily mail does not approve of. In some ways i hope its something properly wrong then we can enjoy his departure without being associated with biblical morality bullshit.
tbh I think we can just enjoy the departure of another tory presuming to lead 'the people's party'.
 
Back
Top Bottom