You can have Jim Murphy if you like, we don't need him anymore
I've seen some absolutely brilliant odds on him becoming next (UK wide) Labour leader. I'll definitely be down the bookies tomorrow.
You can have Jim Murphy if you like, we don't need him anymore
I've seen some absolutely brilliant odds on him becoming next (UK wide) Labour leader. I'll definitely be down the bookies tomorrow.
Ben Bradshaw announces he's standing for deputy; like annoncing you'er prepared to come second in an egg and spoon race.
This leaves the as-yet undeclared T. Hunt as the odds-on "Him? He's in the Labour Party??" candidate.
Christ - what a gallery of dismality. If the labour party had anyone who could come across as a normal person with the ability to articulate arguments in a half convincing way, they'd wipe the field.
Cambridge graduate.Are you including Burnham in that dismality spectrum?
(Not disagreeing with you generally, just not sure about Burnham because I don't know much about him. He sounds a bit Northern for what that's worth).
Oh noes!
(Not disagreeing with you generally, just not sure about Burnham because I don't know much about him. He sounds a bit Northern for what that's worth).
disenchanted northerners might flock to his whippet and flat-cap manifesto
what did we do to deserve him?You can have Jim Murphy if you like, we don't need him anymore
What did we what did we what did we do to deserve him?what did we do to deserve him?
Cambridge graduate.
Caroline Flint is now standing for Deputy Leader, its a Gadarene rush to the Blairites, and she is one of the worst
Didn't her and Purnell jump ship from Brown's cabinet as part of a failed coup?
she went the day after him, and for the same stated reasonsI thought Purnell went on his own?
What the fuck is going on here?
I still reckon you're Guido Fawkes ... are you?Maybe Labour needs to split. Liz Kendall can run Southern Labour, Burnham can run Northern Labour, and some poor sod can have the thankless task of wooing the Picts away from nationalism. Each of the three parties can determine their own policy agenda and, with enough seats, they could govern in coalition. At least it would mean that each party could have a coherent message which would knock out Tories in one patch, maintain the core and defend against Kippers in another, and perhaps reclaim a couple of seats in Scotland.
I still reckon you're Guido Fawkes ... are you?
This talk of raves is pure camouflage, dust thrown in our eyesThere are enormous differences between me and Staines. For a start, he used to promote raves. I would have had them suppressed.
What's wrong with my suggestion, though?
Christ - what a gallery of dismality. If the labour party had anyone who could come across as a normal person with the ability to articulate arguments in a half convincing way, they'd wipe the field.