Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

It looks like Corbyn, if successful, will struggle to convince voters of his anti-austerity message...

http://gu.com/p/4b92f?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

'The polling shows that 56% of those surveyed agree, and just 16% disagree, with the statement: “We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'
Showing once again that...
…what is represented in ideology is therefore not the system of the real relations which govern the existence of individuals, but the imaginary relation of those individuals to the real relations which they live.
Althusser
 
Another hysterical front page anti-Corbyn headline in the 'balanced' and 'neutral' Graunid
That article does have one bit of sense in it
Sources in the Corbyn campaign suggested that the Johnson intervention would backfire on the grounds that Labour members will be unimpressed by his negative tone. A spokesperson for the Corbyn campaign said: “Whatever anyone else says in this leadership election, Jeremy Corbyn is keeping it positive, about policies for growth rather than austerity, not personal attacks. Jeremy’s giving a positive lead and focusing on unity, not division.”
I still don't see Corbyn winning but like with the Scottish Ref and the anti-SNP stuff all the liberal squealing/insults have done is help Corbyn.
 
It looks like Corbyn, if successful, will struggle to convince voters of his anti-austerity message...

http://gu.com/p/4b92f?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

'The polling shows that 56% of those surveyed agree, and just 16% disagree, with the statement: “We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'

Reason why it's illegal to teach politics in schools, or economics in any meaningful way.

The national accounts are not a fucking piggy-bank :mad:
 
It looks like Corbyn, if successful, will struggle to convince voters of his anti-austerity message...

http://gu.com/p/4b92f?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

'The polling shows that 56% of those surveyed agree, and just 16% disagree, with the statement: “We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'

Let's see what happens to public opinion when the next round of cuts plunges us back into recession.
 
Reason why it's illegal to teach politics in schools, or economics in any meaningful way.

The national accounts are not a fucking piggy-bank :mad:

It's just become a reflexive 'truth' repeated ad nauseam without any explanation or thought. In some ways that makes it even harder to challenge because when people say it, and you challenge them on it, it's probably the first time that they have thought about it in any depth or even considered that it might not be the whole truth which immediately makes anyone defensive and inclined to be offended.
 
This is still giving me endless entertainment. This is most of the media at the moment: AAGGHH, there's lefties coming out the woodwork when we thought they'd all died or moved to Venezuela! AGGHHHHH NOOOO, THEY'RE NOT GOING AWAY EVEN THOUGH WE CALLED THEM LEFTIES WHICH WE THOUGHT WAS RUDE.

So much (self-interested) cluelessness among the people who are meant to report on what's happening in this country.
The Guardian is comedy gold at the moment. Hours of fun reading articles with my senile Tory dad.

I spice it up and tell him Arthur Scargill is his deputy and Vladislav Surkov will be his PR man.
 
Reason why it's illegal to teach politics in schools, or economics in any meaningful way.

The national accounts are not a fucking piggy-bank :mad:
yep, and even if it were there's more than one way to reduce the deficit..... economic growth, increased tax receipts and lower numbers reliant on benefits being a far more credible deficit reduction plan than counter cyclical public spending cuts.
 
Agree with sentiment, but not true.
I know very few state school kids ever get the opportunity to study it...but the Edexcel Govt & Politics A2 unit 3/4 topic B does cover ideologies..even Anarchism!

They have their empty claims: I'll have mine :mad:

It's just become a reflexive 'truth' repeated ad nauseam without any explanation or thought. In some ways that makes it even harder to challenge because when people say it, and you challenge them on it, it's probably the first time that they have thought about it in any depth or even considered that it might not be the whole truth which immediately makes anyone defensive and inclined to be offended.

yep, and even if it were there's more than one way to reduce the deficit..... economic growth, increased tax receipts and lower numbers reliant on benefits being a far more credible deficit reduction plan than counter cyclical public spending cuts.

Worse: following the real answer involves a certain amount of numeracy; and even some abstract thought.

Not happening :(

I'd also have thought that:

“We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'

is atrociously phrased and clearly wanting the answer "yes", along the lines of "We mustn't give all our money away, so we should cut foreign aid".

Do we know who commissioned the research? Cruddas? Or someone "for" him?
 
It was done by Cruddas.

And the question “We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”' is blatantly loaded. Its a "push poll" - designed to give a particular response. Worthless other than for propaganda purposes.
Corbyn should do a poll asking people "do you think the economy should be run for the benefit of the people rather than the bankers" and use the inevitable positive response to say that 72% of the public support his policy.
 
It looks like Corbyn, if successful, will struggle to convince voters of his anti-austerity message...

http://gu.com/p/4b92f?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

'The polling shows that 56% of those surveyed agree, and just 16% disagree, with the statement: “We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'
Of course they agree with it at the moment. Who has been giving an alternative message with any kind of consistency or clarity?
 
Its not the first votes its the second votes that's going to win this . I backed Cooper but Burnham has already got some second preference from unions and will continue to do some lefty talking to get some more.
 
I'd also have thought that:

“We must live within our means, so cutting the deficit is the top priority.”'

is atrociously phrased and clearly wanting the answer "yes", along the lines of "We mustn't give all our money away, so we should cut foreign aid".
True enough. And so ambiguous as to be meaningless. We should live within our means, but what are those means and who gets to define them? The second part begs the question too. It doesn't follow from the first part at all (because what are our means?) and hence should not have a "so".
 
The labour right wing have pretty much burnt their bridges though haven't they? "Madness" "economic illiteracy" - can they credibly stay in the party after coming out with stuff like that?
Who hasn't slagged Corbyn off yet?
 
Corbyn's been at between 5-10 times the google trends ranking of any of the other candidates for the last 2 weeks solidly now, and higher than all other candidates every day since 1st July.

That's a fair head of steam he's building up, and the other 3s tactics are probably helping drive a lot of that search traffic his way by making him the main story of this contest.
 
The labour right wing have pretty much burnt their bridges though haven't they? "Madness" "economic illiteracy" - can they credibly stay in the party after coming out with stuff like that?

Time for a sweepstake on the name of the new party :(

Er... The New Party :( :mad: :(
 
True enough. And so ambiguous as to be meaningless. We should live within our means, but what are those means and who gets to define them? The second part begs the question too. It doesn't follow from the first part at all (because what are our means?) and hence should not have a "so".
I'd like to propose an alternative poll question.
We should cut tax for the wealthiest while cuttung benefits for the poorest
Agree or disagree.
 
Back
Top Bottom