Timewaster.Investigate, ask questions do lots of wondering and then come to the obvious conclusion.
Timewaster.Investigate, ask questions do lots of wondering and then come to the obvious conclusion.
Concurrently? Why not just do away with number one completely?
How do you know "There's obviously many, many spurious allegations being made quite shamelessly" until you have investigated and come to some conclusions? Would there also not need to be a stage prior to your second stage to determine what are bad faith accusations and what are genuine allegations that perhaps don't meet the standards of evidence or are based on a misunderstanding in a climate of widespread racist abuse?
Do fuck off. Thanks...We must find out and we must put a stop to it because it is causing undue alarm to Jewish people
has this just turned into the 'post an obvious lie' thread?and we're busy people with much else to do
As to your second question. Number 1 needs to be a real "process" to not only adequately resolve individual cases but to see what steps the Labour party needs to take to combat antisemitism within the party. It should not be a formality a before getting on with the real work of getting a temporary advantage in internal Labour party squabbles. It should be about making the Labour Party, the left and wider society free of anti-Semitism.Is it the proposed chronology that you object to? Or moving beyond stage 1?
I’m angry.Oh dear. You sound upset.
Do fuck off. Thanks.
As to your second question. Number 1 needs to be a real "process" to not only adequately resolve individual cases but to see what steps the Labour party needs to take to combat antisemitism within the party. It should not be a formality a before getting on with the real work of getting a temporary advantage in internal Labour party squabbles. It should be about making the Labour Party, the left and wider society free of anti-Semitism.
Now we've dealt with after stage 1 perhaps we should think about before. Is the current process of investigating anti-Semitism in the Labour Party fit for purpose? It would need to be to deal with these cases and for various reasons not completely the fault of Corbyn and his allies it was not when it mattered.
Given that stage 1 has been underway for some time and there has been no stage 2 I'm not sure what your objection is here.
I think the Labour Party should be as proactive and as vigilant in pursuing stage 2 as they have been with stage 1, if for no other reason than to protect those wrongly accused.
Given that stage 1 has been underway for some time and there has been no stage 2 I'm not sure what your objection is here.
I think the Labour Party should be as proactive and as vigilant in pursuing stage 2 as they have been with stage 1, if for no other reason than to protect those wrongly accused.
it's ok, we've got your number anyway.enough with the dissembling
I tried that. rummo is only interested in rummo ‘s “thoughts”.If you're interested in my thoughts on uk antisemitism I wrote this a few years ago. I'd be much tougher on the likes of Corbyn these days tho. Antisemitism in the UK - Ungagged!
Are you having a good time?Sorry, just to save you the trouble of typing any similar responses, I will not be fucking off.
has this just turned into the 'post an obvious lie' thread?
he fucking loves it, keeping us all captivated by his little racist dance.Are you having a good time?
I'm not completely sure what your stage 2 is but I don't think the Labour Party being "as proactive and as vigilant in pursuing stage 2 as they have been with stage 1" is necessarily the right approach particularly as those wrongly accused would be cleared by an adequate stage 1. Before I can even think about talking about stage 2 in those terms we need some sort of shared understanding of stage 1.Reminds me of the line about Gerald Ford being so dumb he couldn't fart and chew gum at the same time.
Obviously you object to stage 2 in principle, fair enough, I can understand why you would, but enough with the dissembling.
That’s far too thoughtful and nuanced for rummo to bother with.If you're interested in my thoughts on uk antisemitism I wrote this a few years ago. I'd be much tougher on the likes of Corbyn these days tho. Antisemitism in the UK - Ungagged!
Exactly. “How upset Jews must be by all this exaggeration”.Incidentally that bit where rummo was explaining how Jews have been caused “undue alarm” that’s very much how corbyn’s statement on the day report came out felt. When he said it’s the weaponisation that has ‘hurt Jewish people’ & which must not be repeated.
Not just condescending or faux concern but just one more little kick of the football. That’s how it felt, I’m not hypothesising as to his intentions or what he meant.
They don’t look like Jews, they look like Warren Mitchell.After that post about that mural, I don't think rummo is fussed about antisemitism. Its less denialism and more shrug, whatever, look Alf Garnett.
Agreed. Must try to follow that sound advice.There is nothing of value to be achieved from including him in any future conversation - I suggest not giving him any further satisfaction.
This argument has provided a great deal of clarity over the last few days, it's not been a waste of time at all. I think it has become so to continue it though.Agreed. Must try to follow that sound advice.