Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Keir Starmer's time is up

It's been said before but Burnham wasn't very good at politicking the first time around, that's why he lost. I think he probably has got a lot better at it since becoming GM Mayor but equally the King of the North bit is not obviously transferable to, well, anywhere that isn't the north. It's much easier to fight that particular corner than it is to lead the whole party.
We all know what happened to Robb stark, the king in the north.
 
his politics aside (which i gather are shit) he's also just a bit...miserable
Andy-Burnham.jpg
Andy-Burnham.jpg

Andy-Burnham.jpg
PRI169352573.jpg

1621550069372.jpeg
Burnham_3x2.jpg


heres one of him smiling
andy-burnham-running-for-leader-2-28929-1435017896-3_dblbig.jpg


i dont mind that if its matched with a serious attitude to get some real shit done, but I gather thats not really him either
seems like replacing one mopey middle manager facing a midlife crisis with another
NINTCHDBPICT000553371245-e1578964437570.jpg
 
Last edited:
Kieth's got that look of shitting desperation in his eyes every time he's asked a question. Suspect Burnham wouldn't be quite as desperate, but those are the fine margins that Labour might well be looking for. Even a week ago I'd have said there was no possibility starmer will be replaced before the 2024 defeat, largely because parties normally let them go through the full cycle of false optimism through to defeat. But the way he's looked in a couple of interviews, well, he actually looks pathetic. I've no idea how and when he goes and he may last till 2024, but I'm guessing this year's conference will be interesting.
 
his politics aside (which i gather are shit) he's also just a bit...miserable
Andy-Burnham.jpg
Andy-Burnham.jpg

Andy-Burnham.jpg
PRI169352573.jpg

View attachment 269401
Burnham_3x2.jpg


heres one of him smiling
andy-burnham-running-for-leader-2-28929-1435017896-3_dblbig.jpg


i dont mind that if its matched with a serious attitude to get some real shit done, but I gather thats not really him either
seems like replacing one mopey middle manager facing a midlife crisis with another
NINTCHDBPICT000553371245-e1578964437570.jpg
Manchester, so much to answer for.
 
his politics aside (which i gather are shit) he's also just a bit...miserable
Andy-Burnham.jpg
Andy-Burnham.jpg

Andy-Burnham.jpg
PRI169352573.jpg

View attachment 269401
Burnham_3x2.jpg


heres one of him smiling
andy-burnham-running-for-leader-2-28929-1435017896-3_dblbig.jpg


i dont mind that if its matched with a serious attitude to get some real shit done, but I gather thats not really him either
seems like replacing one mopey middle manager facing a midlife crisis with another
NINTCHDBPICT000553371245-e1578964437570.jpg

tbf to burnham he does recognise that one of starmers failings is to not prioritise social care
 
This makes sense to me.

“Start with social care, a commitment to provide it on NHS terms and with pay parity for the care workforce with NHS staff. This brings me to a point about Labour’s approach to identity politics. I think we can do more to advance fair pay for women with a unifying message about social care wages than by talking about women’s pay in abstract and leaving low-paid men feeling no one speaks for them.”
 
I mean, the only reason Burnham appears better now is because he left Parliament and doesn't have to pander to quote as much reactionary nonsense. They're still having council tax raised in Manchester in order to put police in schools mind
 
I mean, the only reason Burnham appears better now is because he left Parliament and doesn't have to pander to quote as much reactionary nonsense. They're still having council tax raised in Manchester in order to put police in schools mind

I keep wondering if there are two Andy Burnham’s. One is the professional northerner who ran a flaccid campaign when Corbyn was elected and was a bang average new Labour Minister. The other being the new darling of the Twitter left.
 
Last edited:
Whatever happened to that massive advocate of Starmer for leader in urban75, fakeplasticgirl? And it seems that the @ doesn’t work either; a name change? Come and defend your man!
no name change, but she hasn't posted in a year. dunno why she can't be tagged though
 
Can't remember who exactly, but there have been occasions where elderly MPs have agreed to give up their seats for a move to the house of lords trough (perhaps Tories?). Looks like Burnham very much wants to be leader, but it's not clear what the ideal route for him is. If Labour lose Batley and Spen - which I'm not convinced they will - it gets pretty close to a 'get Burnham at all costs' scenario I'd have thought. I mean from Labour's point of view, not mine. ;)

Hard to tell how Burnham would be as leader. He'd have a fair wind behind him in the party and he'd probably perform well against Johnson. A lot less dull then kieth, but that's not saying much at all. Politically, a return to something like an Ed Miliband position on some mythical left-right Labour continuum. But exciting? New ideas? Nope, not at all. Labour need to get rid of kieth, he looks like clubbed seal at the moment (and the boring clubbed seal that nobody cares about because he's boring). But Burnham ain't the answer, Labour's problems run a lot deeper.

In politics, "he who wields the sword rarely wears the crown".
 
Kieth's got that look of shitting desperation in his eyes every time he's asked a question. Suspect Burnham wouldn't be quite as desperate, but those are the fine margins that Labour might well be looking for. Even a week ago I'd have said there was no possibility starmer will be replaced before the 2024 defeat, largely because parties normally let them go through the full cycle of false optimism through to defeat. But the way he's looked in a couple of interviews, well, he actually looks pathetic. I've no idea how and when he goes and he may last till 2024, but I'm guessing this year's conference will be interesting.
Blair actually won Sedgefield for the first time in 1983 (as did Corbyn) the same year as the Labour Party also got a massive arse kicking. There were 26 new Labour MP's elected in 2019 so the way things are going it wouldn't surprise me if history isn't repeating itself and the next Labour PM is one of them.
 
Blair actually won Sedgefield for the first time in 1983 (as did Corbyn) the same year as the Labour Party also got a massive arse kicking. There were 26 new Labour MP's elected in 2019 so the way things are going it wouldn't surprise me if history isn't repeating itself and the next Labour PM is one of them.
I think this is that list of 26 with short bio
 
I think they are all much the same in that regard once they get into No.10/the Cabinet. Torture is dreadful, so is war itself, as well as homelessness, poverty etc but people still vote for the fuckers. I'm not saying that point should be glossed over, I honestly don't know the ins and outs of it, but the party doesn't seem to have a lot of options. In terms of Labour's future, I worry about a tipping point where we are stuck with the Tories for at least another generation. David Milliband could be the guy to get the party's house in order, win back lost votes and take it from there. Is he my hero? No! But this current lot in government seem to have given up any pretence that they honour the office that they were elected to, and the lines between selfish business interests and their elected office are murky and blurred indeed. Meanwhile Labour have lost the plot, and offer nothing really. Whether Milliband would be interested in getting involved again I don't know. Speculation and reckons isn't it?
 
Back
Top Bottom