Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keeping tabs on left/alternative news media

I like Novara Media, but Darren Bacardi is the weakest link. He has many dog shit opinions. Here's one example of his dogshittery:

 
He's not a bad interviewer tbf, the bit I don't really get is having Michael Walker as the main frontman. He had a proper grandad moment about too many people being on their phones for New Year the other day.

 
Last edited:
Yeah, I rate Reel News, the sort of thing I reckon we could use more of, non-sectarian coverage of grassroots-level struggles. Although going by that number above, apparently not that many people agree with me?

Building YouTube audience without having either a thorough social media strategy or serious pull elsewhere is difficult, especially if you're not appealing to a US audience. They could do way better if they had the former though imo, the journalism is easily good enough.
 
Also I agree that Bastani is a pain in the arse but it's idealistic to think that Novara is a platform for anything other than the mildest socialist politics and clickbait really.

Of course they do other things, many of them good, but their main driver is being a "big tent" slightly to the left of the Guardian. Their main metrics will be the number of supporters/funders and the number of clicks.
 
Also interesting that former Novara contributor James Meadway (who used to work with McDonnell iirc) has set up his own weekly economics/news podcast Macrodose under the organisational banner of Planet B Productions.

Planet B also does the Politics Theory Other and Verso books podcasts...


 
Last edited:
Also interesting that former Novara contributor James Meadway (who used to work the McDonnell iirc) has set up his own weekly economics/news podcast Macrodose under the organisational banner of Planet B Productions.



Macrodose is excellent. Well worth listening to if anyone is interested in economics and also the interaction between neo/liberalism and the Anthropocene. PTO is also good. Both actually engaging in ideas, thought and often genuinely informative.

Gave up on Novara a long time ago. It felt like a clunking manifestation of the online soi-disant "left".
 
I like Novara Media, but Darren Bacardi is the weakest link. He has many dog shit opinions. Here's one example of his dogshittery:


Tbf, Bastani is frequently shit, and anyone who uses "cope" as a noun or adjective or whatever he's doing there is very annoying and clearly suffering from internet poisoning, but I dunno if the substance of what he's saying is that objectionable. Mao did achieve things and continues to enjoy quite a big rep in China as a result of his achievements. I don't think that means you have to be a Maoist, far from it, but you can oppose Mao/ism while also recognising that it did have real achievements.
Interesting that Novara seems to be getting bigger...


Is it getting bigger or is it just that the one Novara bloke who lives in Leeds* just has a new job title? Actually his article about it looks reasonably decent: Why Novara Media Now Has a North of England Editor | Novara Media
As it happens, somehow I ended up in a conversation about Novara at the pub at the weekend, I kept trying to remember James Butler's name but kept thinking of James Bloodworth, and if I'd gone "you know, the posh one" I don't think it would've narrowed it down too much.
Also fwiw, I did recently set up a thing to give them £3 a month, less out of any great love for them and more from a general sense that it'd be worth supporting some kind of a left media outlet, so as UK stuff goes it's pretty much either them or Tribune. Maybe Tribune would've been a better bet, dunno. Anyway, after I set up they sent me an email with an exclusive chance to buy Bastani live tickets before they go on sale to the public, which was almost enough to make me cancel it on the spot.


*for the trainspotters/file-keepers, I think also arguably one of the most successful careers ever enjoyed by a British (ex-)platformist, although I don't think he talks about those days very much anymore.
 
Tbf, Bastani is frequently shit, and anyone who uses "cope" as a noun or adjective or whatever he's doing there is very annoying and clearly suffering from internet poisoning, but I dunno if the substance of what he's saying is that objectionable. Mao did achieve things and continues to enjoy quite a big rep in China as a result of his achievements. I don't think that means you have to be a Maoist, far from it, but you can oppose Mao/ism while also recognising that it did have real achievements.

Is it getting bigger or is it just that the one Novara bloke who lives in Leeds* just has a new job title? Actually his article about it looks reasonably decent: Why Novara Media Now Has a North of England Editor | Novara Media

That article is more than decent actually, much better than the largely performative outrage/amused superiority I often saw and listened to on their achingly London social media platforms. Yet again however there is scant detail on how their fabled community organising approach is going to actually work. As he correctly notes, "you have to live there".....

Agree with you as well on that Bastani quote, he's correct in his assessment of Mao's reputation. I also think he's much more interesting than some of their contributors. But, for me, he can never recover from the truly execrable Fully Automated Luxury Communism.
 
Bastani's not stupid, his greatest problem is that he built his rep on being radical when he isn't really (I remember him waxing lyrical about the benefits of conservative British democracy from quite early on), and while it was great for building a media position his association with radicalism (that pic of him shirtless at an anti-tax protest) and particularly the way he was labelled as a Corbynist outrider, derailed any early seats in the Commons.

With the exception of maybe James Butler most of that crew were up for talking vaguely about radical socialism but their actual politics, particularly when Corbynism took hold, were pretty standard social democrat. I went to one of their New Year bashes in Hackney when they were still the wunderkind new media centre of the scene and it was notable how badly rinsed on a debate about universal credit their man got by a CPB hack – felt very "students vs actual commie".
 
Yeah, in common with a lot of that scene I suspect I probably like them better now that Corbynism's over and they're no longer able to do all that irritating "we're the sensible adults who are going to be holding state power and writing policy any minute now" stuff.
 
One thing I will say in their favour though - none of them went turncoat (as of yet). That's not nothing given the temptation will have been there, especially for reasonably well-performing media faces like Bastani and Sarkar. Sticking with a media project when it's past the Sexy New Thing phase involves graft and they have stuck with it.
 
Also I agree that Bastani is a pain in the arse but it's idealistic to think that Novara is a platform for anything other than the mildest socialist politics and clickbait really.
For sure and an amusing example can be found here
In a live Q&A a 24 year old asks him as a young person new to all this "how can i be more involved in politics"
to which he answers
  • take out a direct debit, such as to the national trust :D
  • get involved in either Labour or the Greens, maybe become a councilor :D
(also says to become a union organiser)


Downstream is a good interview show though and I like that he doesnt interview the same old people from the left, and broadly I get something out of his more realpolitik approach which is often missing around the left IMO.
 
Last edited:
Also interesting that former Novara contributor James Meadway (who used to work with McDonnell iirc) has set up his own weekly economics/news podcast Macrodose under the organisational banner of Planet B Productions.

Planet B also does the Politics Theory Other and Verso books podcasts...



its hard to find people to trust about economics....fact is we here defintiely dont understand it and so have to put trust in others....how much even experts really do is often far from certain. Larry Eliot in the Guardian continuously gets it wrong for example.

Havent heard James Meadway a lot but in March 2020 before furlough kicked in he was making the case the government should borrow billions to spend on Covid (furlough and healthcare) - which they did. It would create a massive debt BUT he said thats fine because all you need to do in the coming years is increase inflation and reduce the debt that way - as happened after WW2. Seemed reasonable at the time.

Then in 2023 I heard him complaining about how inflation had gone up. I barely ever post on social media but i messaged him to say that I thought he wanted inflation to go up...he said "no, when did i say that?"...I sent him a link to it and he went quiet. I wasn't trying to do a Gotcha, more I genuinely thought what he was saying sounded like good economic sense so was surprised to hear him contradict what he previously said with such certainty ...Now I dont trust him.

Credit to Gary Stevenson who so far at least seems to have an unblemished record on analysis and prediction regarding UK economy at least

Michael Roberts can be interesting but he's a Marxist doom-monger whose blog title basically sums up how he's always predicting the worst and yet the worst never happens as he predicts - still worth a read though from time to time Michael Roberts Blog
 
Last edited:
Thanks ska invita that's funny about Meadway :D

Despite that I'd say the podcast is worth a go.

Gary Stevenson is really interesting and I like the way he explains things. His politics frustrate me - he has a brilliant understanding of what a con the economy is for working class people, but he can't make the leap away from higher taxes for the rich to creating a different system entirely.

Having said that, it will be interesting to see what happens when his book comes out and he gets more opportunities to get into the mainstream media...
 
its hard to find people to trust about economics....fact is we here defintiely dont understand it and so have to put trust in others....how much even experts really do is often far from certain. Larry Eliot in the Guardian continuously gets it wrong for example.

Havent heard James Meadway a lot but in March 2020 before furlough kicked in he was making the case the government should borrow billions to spend on Covid (furlough and healthcare) - which they did. It would create a massive debt BUT he said thats fine because all you need to do in the coming years is increase inflation and reduce the debt that way - as happened after WW2. Seemed reasonable at the time.

Then in 2023 I heard him complaining about how inflation had gone up. I barely ever post on social media but i messaged him to say that I thought he wanted inflation to go up...he said "no, when did i say that?"...I sent him a link to it and he went quiet. I wasn't trying to do a Gotcha, more I genuinely thought what he was saying sounded like good economic sense so was surprised to hear him contradict what he previously said with such certainty ...Now I dont trust him.

Credit to Gary Stevenson who so far at least seems to have an unblemished record on analysis and prediction regarding UK economy at least

Michael Roberts can be interesting but he's a Marxist doom-monger whose blog title basically sums up how he's always predicting the worst and yet the worst never happens as he predicts - still worth a read though from time to time Michael Roberts Blog
Meadway's recent take on inflation, from what I've read / heard, isn't so much that it's a bad thing, but that it's persistent and not caused by the same drivers as previously - and that therefore following the business-as-usual standard economist methods of reducing inflation is unlikely to work. So I'm not sure his past and current views completely contradict each other. I'd rather find a way in my head to explain your anecdote because he's one of the only writers I have much time for at the moment!
 
Thanks ska invita that's funny about Meadway :D

Despite that I'd say the podcast is worth a go.

Gary Stevenson is really interesting and I like the way he explains things. His politics frustrate me - he has a brilliant understanding of what a con the economy is for working class people, but he can't make the leap away from higher taxes for the rich to creating a different system entirely.

Having said that, it will be interesting to see what happens when his book comes out and he gets more opportunities to get into the mainstream media...
Well that's it isn't it, he's someone very much interacting with the system as is, down to actually trading and making money off it.

Agree, I get the impression he's wanting to get into mainstream media as much as possible with this book, so will likely be doing the media rounds. I wish him the best

I think there are a lot of reform of economics that could have a massive impact, not just tax, and post 2008 economic orthodoxy still hasn't had it's comeuppance, current mainstream economics seems to be running on fumes of provenly broken ideas. Sooner or later that has to give
 
Have enjoyed the new Notes from Below printed format they do. Not sure how much it really counts as news media as it seems to be heavily theory based and won't have a particularly broad appeal. Same goes for Red Pepper. Have some good articles and like the range of stuff they cover but neither are really updated enough to be much use as news outlets.

In terms of the Morning Star, its still stocked in the Tulse Hill Co-op! Not sure what to make of that but I've seen a bunch of those Are You A Communist socialist appeal stickers along that strip of south London.
 
Meadway's recent take on inflation, from what I've read / heard, isn't so much that it's a bad thing, but that it's persistent and not caused by the same drivers as previously - and that therefore following the business-as-usual standard economist methods of reducing inflation is unlikely to work. So I'm not sure his past and current views completely contradict each other. I'd rather find a way in my head to explain your anecdote because he's one of the only writers I have much time for at the moment!
He was actively advocating for continuous years of inflation to allow for borrowing, the opposite of wanting to bring it down!

Anyhow I think with each and every economic commentator it needs taking with salt, seems to me it's more an art than science, doesn't mean people don't have interesting things to say... It's more the tone of certainty that winds me up a bit.

A bit old now but Harry Shutt was someone I thought was closer to truth than most but I can't remember what he was saying now :D
I haven't checked his work for years

economics too hard for my brain, very little sticks. I still don't understand basics, like what is money, gold standard, all that stuff. Maybe one day
 
He was actively advocating for continuous years of inflation to allow for borrowing, the opposite of wanting to bring it down!

Anyhow I think with each and every economic commentator it needs taking with salt, seems to me it's more an art than science, doesn't mean people don't have interesting things to say... It's more the tone of certainty that winds me up a bit.

A bit old now but Harry Shutt was someone I thought was closer to truth than most but I can't remember what he was saying now :D
I haven't checked his work for years

economics too hard for my brain, very little sticks. I still don't understand basics, like what is money, gold standard, all that stuff. Maybe one day
But I'm not sure he's saying he wants action to bring it down now - he's saying that the standard methods of doing so are unlikely to work because of the changed circumstances of the Anthropocene. I think he's saying we have to live with it. But I am also not great with economics! But regardless of his consistency, I'm glad he seems to be getting a higher profile for his arguments. There seems to be a few different overlapping schools of thought - degrowth / doughnut economics / foundational economy / community wealth building that must be the basis of some kind of new approach to economics on the left, but gets so little attention in the mainstream.
 
I've seen a bunch of those Are You A Communist socialist appeal stickers along that strip of south London.

That's despite the Star rather than because of it tbf. Socialist Appeal have their own thing.

Without going into my personal takes the Star's paper sales and income have held up remarkably well compared to the rest of the industry (from a low baseline), largely because its CPB and trade union core is pretty reliable. Online it'd grown to a fairly decent level of reach before taking the same hit on social media as many other outlets when Facebook did their anti news rejig.
 
For sure and an amusing example can be found here
In a live Q&A a 24 year old asks him as a young person new to all this "how can i be more involved in politics"
to which he answers
  • take out a direct debit, such as to the national trust :D
  • get involved in either Labour or the Greens, maybe become a councilor :D
(also says to become a union organiser)


Downstream is a good interview show though and I like that he doesnt interview the same old people from the left, and broadly I get something out of his more realpolitik approach which is often missing around the left IMO.
His entire demeanour during that show was weirdly super defensive
 
Back
Top Bottom