yeh but as the song goes, there's always something there to remind me. what you write in haste now may come back and haunt you later on, be it weeks, months, or with increasing frequency, years later.well, it is. You write something and many many folks will kick off. Someone gets their facts wrong, you should have the confidence to make your defence and move on.
Right then - I'm sticking in a claim for mental anguishShe'll have to do more media 'work' to pay for it.
One firm quotes between £150 and £500 per hour.Fucking hell, just how expensive must barrister hours be?
aha. Thing is I can't imagine a barrister having to do many hours of work before deciding Hopkins was libellous, even at £500 an hour that is a lot of hours!
aha. Thing is I can't imagine a barrister having to do many hours of work before deciding Hopkins was libellous, even at £500 an hour that is a lot of hours!
picky today kb! they will likely determine if the case is winnable, (i.e. if Hopkins was libellous) before advising their client to go ahead with the case.The barrister doesn't decide she's libellous, they argue she's libellous (or not) in court.
it cost jack monroe 185K to bring this case??(in fact, if it's only 60% of the costs as David Allen Green suggested, she's still out of pocket by the best part of 50 grand)
I'm not sure - tbh I'm speculating the amounts based entirely on the limited info that's been reported so far - should probably shut up.it cost jack monroe 185K to bring this case??
winning back £105k in costs plus the £25k damages??
BUT THIS IS THE INTERNET - SHUTTING UP IS NOT AN OPTIONI'm not sure - tbh I'm speculating the amounts based entirely on the limited info that's been reported so far - should probably shut up.
it cost jack monroe 185K to bring this case??
winning back £105k in costs plus the £25k damages??
right...but what were her costs in the first place...and does this leave JM out of pocket?The award seems to break down to:
£105k fees
£25k damages
One "Make the Mail Great Again" baseball cap
An apology of 140 characters or less
a single tear
Do you not think the mail will cover Hopkin's costs?Hopkins' biggest mistake would seem to be cussing Monroe via Twitter rather than on the Mail website.
noDo you not think the mail will cover Hopkin's costs?
Oh well. from looking like a lose lose it now looks like a win!
They're not under any legal obligation toDo you not think the mail will cover Hopkin's costs?
Mutiny on the Byline.They're not under any legal obligation to
(in fact, if it's only 60% of the costs as David Allen Green suggested, she's still out of pocket by the best part of 50 grand)
I like how the bare-foot man in the picture is making the wanker sign.They're not under any legal obligation to
I'm not sure - tbh I'm speculating the amounts based entirely on the limited info that's been reported so far - should probably shut up.