The post about the Nigerian guy (see what I did there) is a red herring. Trashy had skim read and clocked it as mildly offensive in context, and raised the fact that no one had jumped on the poster as possible evidence that Manter was being hounded for something other than her words (I hope that is a fair summary trashy).So relaying an anecdote where a Nigerian claims "we're all lazy" is the same as you yourself actually saying "Nigerians are lazy"?
If I say "back in '91 I was chatting with my mate Joe at work, and he said 'bloody Nigerians, we all work bloody hard finding ways to avoid working. If we channeled our energy into actual work, we'd be world-beaters' ", have I just claimed that Nigerians are lazy and/or crooked, or have I related an anecdote about what a single Nigerian individual has said to me?
I agree with that. It is a natural form of speech, often scans better in a sentence, and I don't think it's problematic on occasion. It's just not a great habit to get into. The Indian, the Gay, the Cripple, the Bint, the Ginger, the Chav ...what does the straight, white, able-bodied middle-class male get called?I can understand the argument that 'the overheads/indians/etc' can be used to dehumanise people but I don't think that means we should never use it as short hand when identifying people.
We do it naturally, especially in the work place. People are referred to identify them from other people quickly. Waiters talk about tables, doctors/dentists/therapists etc talk about appointment times, teachers talk about years.
Aahh, VP. Firstly, I had a transplant because of a hereditary condition. Nothing to do with my mystical legendary drink and drugs intake, that is really quite a crass thing to say. Surprised at you but I know you well enough to know that's not what you meant. Also I never really was one for drugs, I experimented here and there but that's all. I still smoke weed for the muscular pain I get in my abdomen, it helps enormously as well as having other beneficial side effects (i.e getting stoned!). Also I did like a drink, I won't deny that one, I used to hammer it when I was at uni but I was no George Best. As a matter of fact my LFT's were that of a perfectly healthy adult. In the end cancer got the better of my old liver - not drink, not drugs. Check your privileges, old man.
Now roll the fuck off
The best jokes make a serious point. If someone is late, they are late. But if they happen to be disabled, it's because they are disabled. And if they're Nigerian, it's because Nigerians are lazy.Typical fucking disabled
That was supposed to be a joke but it doesn't look v funny written down
ymu Yes fair summary
"It's probably a man's fault".WTF is women's logic?
It's the equivalent of dismissing a link to wikipedia on the grounds that it is wikipedia, regardless of how well referenced the article itself is. A refuge for egotistical idiots who have no counter-argument to offer but refuse to admit defeat."Women's logic" another classic that's thrown about.
WTF is women's logic?
Default.I agree with that. It is a natural form of speech, often scans better in a sentence, and I don't think it's problematic on occasion. It's just not a great habit to get into. The Indian, the Gay, the Cripple, the Bint, the Ginger, the Chav ...what does the straight, white, able-bodied middle-class male get called?
It's not about you, it's about whether a group of people, any group of people, should be regarded and identified by a single defining characteristic such as age or disability when it's only a part of who they actually are.
Me, for example, I'm disabled, but I'm also white; male; middle-aged; a supporter of West Ham United FC; a photographer; an anti-fascist and anti-Zionist; a superannuated punk and many other things. "disabled" isn't all that I am, it's a single facet of me, why should someone be allowed to refer to myself and others with similarly diverse characteristics (and that's all of us, by the way!) by that single signifier when it doesn't represent more than a fraction of me, and is perjorative to boot?
Not true. "Canucking" means serial posting without reading the thread. I usually read the thread first.
Or steelgate, phildwyer, Methlab?Not pbman, detective_boy and ninjaboy, then?
.
Default.
And diesel.
Aahh, VP. Firstly, I had a transplant because of a hereditary condition. Nothing to do with my mystical legendary drink and drugs intake, that is really quite a crass thing to say. Surprised at you but I know you well enough to know that's not what you meant. Also I never really was one for drugs, I experimented here and there but that's all. I still smoke weed for the muscular pain I get in my abdomen, it helps enormously as well as having other beneficial side effects (i.e getting stoned!). Also I did like a drink, I won't deny that one, I used to hammer it when I was at uni but I was no George Best. As a matter of fact my LFT's were that of a perfectly healthy adult. In the end cancer got the better of my old liver - not drink, not drugs. Check your privileges, old man.
Now roll the fuck off
Six people in an office. Five of them white. One of them is late. Person remarks, "the black is late".
Nice.
You're doing it again, first time on perhaps years, you're posting random lyrics to thread. "proper urbans" or is it "real urbans" ? I forget
I'm gonna feel really embarrassed if i find out you're not the right wing apologist, gun nut loving, anti semitic, nakid thread stalking, Anne Coulter palm fapping, shit lyrics quoting dude you've been hoodwinking me with all these years dudeO
Just goes to show: it's possible to be taken in by someone's presentation on the internet; which might be quite different from their reality.
You brushed me away the other day.
I'm gonna feel really embarrassed if i find out you're not the right wing apologist, gun nut loving, anti semitic, nakid thread stalking, Anne Coulter palm fapping, shit lyrics quoting dude you've been hoodwinking me with all these years dude
Can you have a two man circle jerk?That's how it is in relationships.