Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Johnny Mercer's witness statement

PR1Berske

Alligator in chains by the park gates.
Taken from Prospect:
Full article: The remarkable witness statement of Johnny Mercer

Quotes:

An extraordinary witness statement has been published. You can read it here. Indeed, before you read this post any further, click into the witness statement and read it. The statement tells one of the most remarkable stories. It reads like a treatment for a film; its screen rights should be optioned without delay.

As with many good stories, it has an unlikely protagonist. And here the protagonist is the government minister and former soldier Johnny Mercer.

You may have heard of him. In particular, you may have come across his sheer disdain for certain lawyers and for what he sees as vexatious litigation against those who have served in the armed forces.


And in this respect, he has been quite effective. Two acts of parliament—the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021 and Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023—exist in good part because of his drive and determination. Both statutes make it more difficult for former service personnel to face legal accountability.

The witness statement tells us how Mercer pieced various things together to shake his beliefs and to fuel his increasing concern. But, like the unlikely protagonist in many other stories, he is getting nowhere and is being obstructed and brushed off.

He demands to see more evidence. He wants to see the full motion videos of the detention operations. Such evidence has been telling in Australia for showing that Australian special forces allegedly killed unarmed Afghans. But he is told that no video footage is available. He does not believe this to be true.

The impression one gets both from the witness statement and the oral evidence Mercer has now given is that he believes he was used—“gamed” is his word—by the Ministry of Defence. His passion for protecting veterans from what calls “lawfare” was exploited by more senior ministers and officials in getting legal protection onto the statute books, but the full picture was kept from him. This impression is probably accurate, and it explains the anger that is plain in his evidence.

Mercer, a junior minister, then decides to write a letter to his own secretary of state, Ben Wallace. This letter, from August 2020, is now also in the public domain—and, like the witness statement, it should be read in full.

The content of this letter is also huge. For example, in the letter Mercer explains that he read out statements to the House of Commons which others in the Ministry of Defence must have known to be false. As Mercer said in oral evidence, “I was very cross that I had been allowed to make a statement in the House of Commons in January that year that was clearly incorrect when faced with the evidence that existed within my own department—and for me that was a kind of red line being crossed, in terms of, you know, ‘we're not on the same side here.’”
 
Mercer was always a naive helpful idiot for the Tories.

Boundless energy, ex military, but not very clever.

Predictable that he is suprised he’s been “Gamed” by the big dogs.

A man who would be politically out of his depth at a provincial swimming club AGM
 
Last edited:
Seems to me that Mr Mercer is covering his arse. He knew about this shit and his worry wasn't "we should not rest until this is sorted out" but "I'm in the middle of it and it's going to make me look bad". Referring it to your boss and trusting the process is all well and good but he already knew he was being kept in the dark.

And... not to go off topic but what the fuck is going on here? Gilet and suit jacket?

Screenshot_20240322_080744_Chrome.jpg
 
Seems to me that Mr Mercer is covering his arse. He knew about this shit and his worry wasn't "we should not rest until this is sorted out" but "I'm in the middle of it and it's going to make me look bad". Referring it to your boss and trusting the process is all well and good but he already knew he was being kept in the dark.

And... not to go off topic but what the fuck is going on here? Gilet and suit jacket?

View attachment 416804
for that alone he should be hauled in front of some sort of tribunal
 
Mercer in effect admitted last month in front of the public inquiry into the claims that he believed members of the SAS had engaged in dozens of unlawful killings of Afghan civilians between 2010 and 2013.

But he repeatedly refused to hand over names of “multiple officers” who he claimed told him about allegations of murder and a cover-up during his time as a backbench MP.

Lord Justice Haddon-Cave , the chair of the Afghanistan inquiry, told him last month that his decision to “refuse to answer legitimate questions … at a public inquiry” were “disappointing … surprising … and completely unacceptable”.
 
You complain about the lack of principles in polittics, but when a politician does something principled he
1) gets called naive
2) has his dress sense questioned
3) gets jumped on for not having acted earlier
And my loathing for that village gnome Hislop is so great I haven’t watched the exchange: but if Mercer was skewering the little turd, well done him
 
well after the Danny boy enquiry turned into a crock of shit
innocent Farmers rounded up tortured and executed according to the survivors :rolleyes:

turned out to be milita members wanting a payout and the "human rights" lawyers knew this but carried on somehow CSI Afghanistan isn't going to provide any evidence worth shit.
much like the Kenyan rape investigation over 2000 interviews 200 possible worth of further investigations but nothing useable to put in front of a court lot of very badly forged documents produced.
 
His practice run on ' banged up' should help him settle in 🤞
He's picked a really good time as the gaols are full to bursting, making a custodial sentence less likely

So I am not confident he'll be imprisoned
 
Back
Top Bottom