Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

Yes, as I said, cash. The difference is, Corbyn made it easy for them.
Aaargh and the speccy bloke would have made it harder by pushing policies that 'their' masters wouldn't have been threatened by. They'd still have lost because they'd have represented the square root of fuck all. Who do you suggest would have done differently and with which policies that would have differentiated them from the tories?
 
I don't hate you, but I hate my accuracy. No matter what posters here think of me, I'm still correct.
Johnson is clearly an utter cunt, and one that any good Labour Leader should have exposed and smashed, but a wet wimp like Corbyn could never manage.
Again, how could rippling collossii such as Aaargh, speccy bloke or the handsome Millipede have approached things differently?
 
Again, how could rippling collossii such as Aaargh, speccy bloke or the handsome Millipede have approached things differently?

They wouldn't have been Corbyn :rolleyes:

There'd have been nothing for the sun and the mail and the express and the telegraph and the times and the metro to have criticized them for.
 
They wouldn't have been Corbyn :rolleyes:

There'd have been nothing for the sun and the mail and the express and the telegraph and the times and the metro to have criticized them for.
That's right. A strong, photogenic Labour leader attempting to reintroduce mild social democracy wouldn't have attracted a scintilla of the opprobrium that the limp and ineffective Corbyn did. Oh no.
 
I don't hate you, but I hate my accuracy. No matter what posters here think of me, I'm still correct.
Johnson is clearly an utter cunt, and one that any good Labour Leader should have exposed and smashed, but a wet wimp like Corbyn could never manage.

I'm right! I'm right! We're all fucked but I'm right! Hahaha!

That's what you're doing right now, except for the being right bit (pretty much everyone here thought a Tory win was likely so you're not alone there). Even if you were right, if you weren't a complete and utter fucking arsehole, you'd not be doing a victory dance over people's futile hopes that maybe things might not be too bad.
 
I don't hate you, but I hate my accuracy. No matter what posters here think of me, I'm still correct.
Johnson is clearly an utter cunt, and one that any good Labour Leader should have exposed and smashed, but a wet wimp like Corbyn could never manage.

Corbyn's more of a winner than his detractors could ever hope to be. Unfortunately, it's entirely because of people like you, Don, that the Tories won. All to willing to buy into the bullshit propaganda against Corbyn.

Hang your head in shame, fella.
 
I don't hate you, but I hate my accuracy. No matter what posters here think of me, I'm still correct.
Johnson is clearly an utter cunt, and one that any good Labour Leader should have exposed and smashed, but a wet wimp like Corbyn could never manage.
So the almighty heft of a rabid right wing press and the millions paid into a disinformation campaign through social media played no part in you deciding Corbyn was a 'wimp.'
You stupid, naive twat. You're just another manipulated sucker.
 
The difference being I want a labour government and support Labour, not want an idiotic attempt at government that does the tories a favour. I still wonder if Corbyn will get a brown paper bag stuffed with tenners and a high 5 from Johnson.
Yes but you've not answered my question though. You seem even more unpopular here than Jeremy so when will you resign?
 
They have sandwich vetting teams to deal with that kind of potential pratfall these days. Cheese and pickle being the only safe option.

Just cheese is by far the safer option.

Ive had trouble with pickle before leaving stains.
 
You stupid, naive twat. You're just another manipulated sucker.

Me and a growing number of Labour MPs.
This is hardly a shock, but Catherine Mckinnell is saying exactly what I am right now. A mate that's there at the moment reports she's blaming her minus 10 point swing on Corbyn.
 
Yes but you've not answered my question though. You seem even more unpopular here than Jeremy so when will you resign?

I have no intention of doing so as, much as I'm unpopular with you, I'm still right and very pro-Labour.
Pro-Labour means doing whatever is required to dump the tories, not help them along as Corbyn is doing. History is going to show Corbyn as another Foot, a useless bugger with no hope of ever seeing the keys to number 10, and a great little helper for a far right tory bastard.
 
So the almighty heft of a rabid right wing press and the millions paid into a disinformation campaign through social media played no part in you deciding Corbyn was a 'wimp.'

Yes it did, but not for the reasons you assume. The press would find it extremely hard work to attack a good leader with popular, sensible policies, but Corbyn made life easy for them, their only tough choices being which negative stories to print before they ran out of pages.
Remind me what Corbyn's stand on Brexit, the biggest single issue in this election, was.
Wimp out and pray just doesn't work, and his excuse of being a great statesman just made him look even wimpier.
He's a cheap hack's wet dream for Labour leader, and that means they were right to attack him, even if it was for the wrong reasons.
Ironic, isn't it?
 
Yes it did, but not for the reasons you assume. The press would find it extremely hard work to attack a good leader with popular, sensible policies, but Corbyn made life easy for them, their only tough choices being which negative stories to print before they ran out of pages.
Remind me what Corbyn's stand on Brexit, the biggest single issue in this election, was.
Wimp out and pray just doesn't work, and his excuse of being a great statesman just made him look even wimpier.
He's a cheap hack's wet dream for Labour leader, and that means they were right to attack him, even if it was for the wrong reasons.
Ironic, isn't it?
You seem to be mistaking the election for a Brexit referendum. His policies on multiple issues were sound as fuck but he had no chance against a well funded right wing press and people like you.
 
Yes it did, but not for the reasons you assume. The press would find it extremely hard work to attack a good leader with popular, sensible policies, but Corbyn made life easy for them, their only tough choices being which negative stories to print before they ran out of pages.
Remind me what Corbyn's stand on Brexit, the biggest single issue in this election, was.
Wimp out and pray just doesn't work, and his excuse of being a great statesman just made him look even wimpier.
He's a cheap hack's wet dream for Labour leader, and that means they were right to attack him, even if it was for the wrong reasons.
Ironic, isn't it?
You still haven't said what you think defines 'sensible'!
 
Back
Top Bottom