Since the thread was talking about the women's initiative stuff, as well as working class stuff, I don't know if Angela Rayner's mini-speech was linked to or not, but I thought it was really good.
It showed how to talk about women's issues without it being empty, and tied it to class and poverty and education, and issues that will be far closer to most people's experiences than the stuff some other politicians come out with.
If we want more working class politicians, we want them to sound like her (not just in accent - but accent of course has an effect), and not Alan Johnson, for example. She spoke with a passion that showed she absolutely understood what it is to struggle and be ground down. Can you imagine her talking to constituents about their problems, and contrast it to someone like Tristram talking to his? Just that initial impression has an impact. But beyond that, for someone like Tristram those struggles are abstract. For someone like her they're a reality. (I'm not suggesting she's the second coming, I don't know much else about her tbh.)
It's not as easy as Corbs saying "right, 75% of all MPs must have worked in a factory" or whatever. As I wrote in another post, while he has some power, the party machinery (NEC and McNicol, and then region below them) have substantially more when it comes to things like shortlists and the like. It's easy for Corbyn to make his pledges about all-women shortlists - not least because Labour already has them (not sure what's so different about his conception of them) - because that's the way the wind is already blowing and there are few who would disagree with the general point. But all-working class shortlists? Quite apart from the impossibility of deciding what the criteria would be, it would be a policy based firmly in class, and the wind very much is not blowing in that direction in wider politics/society. It's pushing back against it, in fact. So it would require one heck of a lot more manoeuvring before it could be a manifesto point or party policy, or even a vague intention. For a start, McNicol needs to go, and then regional officers. But they're all employed, and not elected, so the way it's done would have to be very delicate to say the least. I hope the new NEC starts that work when they come in after conference, but the new 6 on the NEC aren't the only ones on there, so it's not like they suddenly have a clear road ahead of them to do what they want. McNicol's still there, for a start.
I agree he needs to make it clear he wants 'ordinary people' coming into the ranks as MPs and administrative officers. A very overt announcement would be great, but I don't think it's going to happen in the way it did with something like all-women shortlists. This is the stuff of backroom manoeuvring. It's ensuring new members get involved in their CLPs so they can eventually stand for local positions, and it's getting rid of McNicol and regional officers so they can't stitch up selections, and it's getting those local people in a position where they can start standing, and actually have a chance of winning a selection (which is rare precisely because of the stitch-up culture; you'll get some golden boy parachuted in and region will fix it so the only others on the shortlist are really so abysmally dire you wouldn't vote for them even if they are a lefty - that plus other underhand shenanigans). It's the long game, which is incredibly frustrating of course.