What does it tell you?Here's the entrance to a keep Corbyn rally in London tonight. Quite telling.
Shut the door!183,541
Here's the entrance to a keep Corbyn rally in London tonight. Quite telling.
Crick is a twat.
This is a Corbyn pyramid scheme money making scam!!
Of course they would! The Corbynites are very good at intimidation, try and keep up.If Labour people told them to just go away or at least stop their conspicuous advertising and paper flogging would they do it? Presumably people have already asked...
Here's the entrance to a keep Corbyn rally in London tonight. Quite telling.
The ex student leader Michael Chessum in the beige chinos and purple t shirt, and is that a senior SWP head next to the guy in the bucket hat?
Labour supporters have cooled on Corbyn, Guardian survey finds
Research finds enthusiasm waning for party leader but no evidence of support for any other candidate
Labour supporters have cooled on Corbyn, Guardian survey finds
By asking only party officers and councilors it appears. Do they get multiple votes or something?Oh, what a surprise, new research finds what the Guardian wants.
Never mind Team Milliband were invisible for the first four years of the last parliament.
and claimed it can be broadened out not just to the membership but labour supporters as a whole. blatantly dishonestBy asking only party officers and councilors it appears. Do they get multiple votes or something?
So, the LP =PLP line from the Guardian having failed, it has now democratised into LP=party officers and elected members.
Stan James has already come in from 2/5 (to make a 40% return on investment) to 3/10 (30% ROI). Best odds now available are 4/11 with William Hill and Coral - that represents a 36% ROI.The best odds you can get on Corbyn to win are 2/5 with Stan James (from oddschecker) Can you think of a better way to make a 40% return in less than 2 months?
Could you define the difference between those three groups? I'm sure there are differences but in practice I wonder what they are
There's a reasonably ethical history of doing a 'state of the party' surveys by contacting the chair's of constituency parties/associations. For example I can remember the BBC doing them in the Tory Party throughout John Major's travails. Far from scientific, but reasonably consistent with regard to who at least gets asked the question. This seems to be much more random, mixture of chairs, secretaries, local exec members, councillors. Certainly smacks of a trawl intended to garner up 'disatisfaction'.and claimed it can be broadened out not just to the membership but labour supporters as a whole. blatantly dishonest
I reckon the 25 quidder numbers are so high because of gut reaction. They realise Jez is playing an honest game against dirty tricks, and they like him including his heartfelt left belief. I think a lot of the less commited wider electorate will feel the same after the PLP have come into line or been deselected.
You can imagine their reaction, after gerrymandering it to the point of making it £25 a vote: 'fuck, me they are STILL registering to support out party. What's wrong with these people?'I reckon the 25 quidder numbers are so high because of gut reaction. They realise Jez is playing an honest game against dirty tricks, and they like him including his heartfelt left belief. I think a lot of the less commited wider electorate will feel the same after the PLP have come into line or been deselected.
You can imagine their reaction, after gerrymandering it to the point of making it £25 a vote: 'fuck, me they are STILL registering to support out party. What's wrong with these people?'
I reckon the 25 quidder numbers are so high because of gut reaction. They realise Jez is playing an honest game against dirty tricks, and they like him including his heartfelt left belief. I think a lot of the less commited wider electorate will feel the same after the PLP have come into line or been deselected.
Is these subtle differences that prompted my question. Thanksone's a bunch of twunts. that one's a bunch of twunts. and the other one's a bunch of twunts.
hope that helps.
It's next week - on tuesday.The court hearing about whether Corbyn's name is indeed automatically on the ballot paper was today. I don't think there's been a result yet but I heard the judge wasn't altogether thrilled that McNicol seemed to be rolling over to the Plaintiff and saying 'tickle me'.
I'd be amazed if the case goes against Corbyn. However, if it did and they had to restart the leadership election, we'd be at the far end of farce, twice round the track and out the other side. Theresa May might as well just launch her loudest eggyist farts at PMQs the state the labour party is in.The court hearing about whether Corbyn's name is indeed automatically on the ballot paper was today. I don't think there's been a result yet but I heard the judge wasn't altogether thrilled that McNicol seemed to be rolling over to the Plaintiff and saying 'tickle me'.