Just another self-serving labour politician waiting to shit on the working class.
the worst of them you can tell by the damning letters 'mp' after their name. it stands for massive prickJust another self-serving labour politician waiting to shit on the working class.
She's one of the few MPs in parliament who consistently refers to class, and to social movements as the key driver of change and referrent for her politics, but she didn't say exactly what you want so you're going to bitch and moan about it. This is why we can't have nice things.
i don't think you understand her at all if 'this is why we can't have nice things' is your conclusion. back in the dim and distant past i and a colleague or two from london fight the poll tax met dennis skinner in parliament, and he he said you'll do much more to get change outside this place than inside. very true. and here you have another mp telling you that social movements are the key driver of change and you don't listen. if mps won't or can't deliver meaningful change except in a negative direction then what use are they?She's one of the few MPs in parliament who consistently refers to class, and to social movements as the key driver of change and referrent for her politics, but she didn't say exactly what you want so you're going to bitch and moan about it. This is why we can't have nice things.
Within the institutional frameworks we have to deal with, having people in power who realise that the best type of power lies with movements is a positive thing, I would say. It's not about relying on MPs, but there can be positives about having people with power who are more on your side than others. Having a go at them all the time for not have the pure view of class struggle that you hold is just worthless noise tbh. You do the proper class struggle, if that's what you want, and see if the MPs respond when you need them to, but don't rely on them.i don't think you understand her at all if 'this is why we can't have nice things' is your conclusion. back in the dim and distant past i and a colleague or two from london fight the poll tax met dennis skinner in parliament, and he he said you'll do much more to get change outside this place than inside. very true. and here you have another mp telling you that social movements are the key driver of change and you don't listen. if mps won't or can't deliver meaningful change except in a negative direction then what use are they?
if mps won't or can't deliver meaningful change except in a negative direction then what use are they?
i am very surprised by your suggestion that social movements have the best form of power, when the thing 'social movement' is not either positive or negative. there are progressive social movements; there are regressive social movements.Within the institutional frameworks we have to deal with, having people in power who realise that the best type of power lies with movements is a positive thing, I would say.
Just another self-serving labour politician waiting to shit on the working class.
Good anarcho-anarchist with anarchist characteristics analysis, but if that were her objective wouldn't she be cosying up to the revisionist Starmer clique?
Within the institutional frameworks we have to deal with, having people in power who realise that the best type of power lies with movements is a positive thing, I would say. It's not about relying on MPs, but there can be positives about having people with power who are more on your side than others. Having a go at them all the time for not have the pure view of class struggle that you hold is just worthless noise tbh. You do the proper class struggle, if that's what you want, and see if the MPs respond when you need them to, but don't rely on them.
When did you become a supporter of pacts with the middle class and electoralism?
And no, she wouldn’t. Her brand of politics has been safely contained, accommodated and marginalised for as long as the Labour Party has existed
ETA: and I’m not even criticising her for that. But some mention of the organised working class, collective organisation and movements outside of electoral considerations shouldn’t be too much of an ask should it??
Middle-age man takes to the internet to denounce 28 year-old working class socialist muslim woman based off of one quote from the New Statesman. Strong look.
"obdurate refusal to learn lessons" - what are you, a private school headmaster from the 1932?
Maybe she takes unions as read, given the famous, historic and strong links between Labour and the unions?As usual your arguing about a point that hasn’t been made. Of course it’s useful to have people in power on your side, but the point I was making is that in the interview her strategy was silent on social movements, unions, left behind communities where a political vacuum exists and merely restated the previous (failed) strategy of pursuing an alliance of the youth, Muslims and middle class liberals
No, not necessarily.but if that were her objective wouldn't she be cosying up to the revisionist Starmer clique?
How else would you characterise the labour left’s current response to the last 5 years?
I’d give them an A+. They did their best to stop this country becoming a neo-Trumpian shithole but everybody else - electorate included - fucked it up.
You express outrage at any hint of criticism of anyone on the soggy labour left who are calling for pacts with fellow middle class liberals but slag off and blame millions of people for capitalism. Just lol.
Ever get the feeling a rethink of the modus operandi might be useful?
This is your problem - you actually believe that.Yet in your bizarre world the people who did their best to get a program of political and economic redistribution implemented - against all the odds
This is your problem - you actually believe that.
the current government have done their best to get an ambitious programme of political and economic redistribution implemented but you never recognise their accomplishments in that field.Yet in your bizarre world the people who did their best to get a program of political and economic redistribution implemented - against all the odds - are the ones who should be condemned but the people who voted for the clique of Bullingdon conmen to run the country are not to blame at all for the 100% predicable outcome of their actions?
I have no modus operandi, I retired from politics in December 2019 when it became obvious that this country is fucked beyond repair.
Apparently just had a book on Churchill published. I guess the SWP have forgiven him for his 'vote Lib Dem' period .Didn't know Tariq Ali was still going.
Also don't know why anyone would touch the SWP with a barge pole.
This has the reek of legal threats behind the scenes.or not?
Ex-YouGov worker retracts claim it suppressed pro-Corbyn poll
Former political research manager says he accepts colleagues had misgivings about methodologywww.theguardian.com
the guy who made the claim about the poll being suppressed has gone back on that.
and he did say: "“I also believe then, as I do now, that the methodology was acceptable and the survey was conducted to the highest standard."This has the reek of legal threats behind the scenes.