Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up


Vaguely recognise the name, did he used to be somebody?


There is a point where mutual defense organization's become too large to be effective. However do offer a cost effective and force amplifiin way of keeping bar do wells at bay.

You can't just offer those with a conflicting intrest a pot of jam and hope everything will be alright
 
Not really sure what the post above is about, but anyway.
We're entering the start of peak SWP postering season, and I spotted one of these yesterday:
1650528287484.png
Did he always do that, or is this a new development?
 
The detail about him being "in the Bookmarks culture tent" is particularly baffling. Unless he's moved on from jam-making to yoghurt-making?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDC
Depressing stuff. If the left of the party is signed up to ‘socialism without the working class’ dead end then the intellectual, political and existential disorientation of the Labour Party is even more sharp than I’d realised.

Given where she comes from, and given the support she’s enjoyed from Unite in our region, I’m hoping that the quote is selective editing from the New Statesman.

 
Last edited:
Sorry, not with you - which quote?
This perhaps?

To have a Labour prime minister in Downing Street, the electoral coalition that you need is young people. It’s ethnic-minority communities, its Muslims and its progressives. And the local election results in England suggest that we are perhaps losing prospective Labour voters to the Greens and to the Lib Dems. And that’s something that I think the leadership should pay a lot of attention to.”
 
This perhaps?
What she says is true though - you do need those people. You could argue that there are a lot of other omissions - disabled people, refugees, people on benefits, and so on. Plus very many of the people she mentions will be working-class.

What does working-class mean these days, anyway?
 
Depressing stuff. If the left of the party is signed up to ‘socialism without the working class’ dead end then the intellectual, political and existential disorientation of the Labour Party is even more sharp than I’d realised.

Given where she comes from, and given the support she’s enjoyed from Unite in our region, I’m hoping that the quote is selective editing from the New Statesman.

It's the New Statesman view of the Labour left which is not always the same thing as the actual Labour Left (although it is sometimes)
 
Sorry, not with you - which quote?
What she says is true though - you do need those people. You could argue that there are a lot of other omissions - disabled people, refugees, people on benefits, and so on. Plus very many of the people she mentions will be working-class.

What does working-class mean these days, anyway?

What she could have said is “To have a Labour prime minister in Downing Street, we need to reconnect when those communities that once supported us but who have been turning away from us in growing numbers for the past 30 years. We need to find out why by first listening to them. We need to work with and support trade unions to rebuild and to organise workers in the private sector and we need to help communities to renew collective institutions that promote and provide social solidarity. To win we need an electoral coalition of the modern British working class: young and old, multi racial and across all parts of Britain. And the local election results in England suggest that we are perhaps losing prospective Labour voters to the Greens and to the Lib Dems. And that’s something that I think the leadership should pay a lot of attention to.”

It’s not hard is it and that suggests that the omissions are quite deliberate and that no lessons have been learned from the last GE. And we know how that turned ot. As I say, depressing
 
Last edited:
What she could have said is “To have a Labour prime minister in Downing Street, we need to reconnect when those communities that once supported us but who have been turning away from us in growing numbers for the past 30 years. We need to find out why by first listening to them. We need to work with and support trade unions to rebuild and to organise workers in the private sector and we need to help communities to renew collective institutions that promote and provide social soldiery. To win we need an electoral coalition of the modern British working class: young and old, multi racial and across all parts of Britain. And the local election results in England suggest that we are perhaps losing prospective Labour voters to the Greens and to the Lib Dems. And that’s something that I think the leadership should pay a lot of attention to.”

It’s not hard is it and that suggests that the omissions are quite deliberate and that no lessons have been learned from the last GE. And we know how that turned ot. As I say, depressing
not quite as snappy though is it? more than twice as long.
 
I think the younger generation are proletarianised like never before (in living memory) and more aware of it. Labour and the Labour left aren't about sinking new routes into working class communities and I can't remember a time when they were, they certainly failed to do this during the Corbyn years. But with that failure in mind I don't blame them for looking to where there's real spontaneous energy.
 
What she could have said is “To have a Labour prime minister in Downing Street, we need to reconnect when those communities that once supported us but who have been turning away from us in growing numbers for the past 30 years. We need to find out why by first listening to them. We need to work with and support trade unions to rebuild and to organise workers in the private sector and we need to help communities to renew collective institutions that promote and provide social soldiery. To win we need an electoral coalition of the modern British working class: young and old, multi racial and across all parts of Britain. And the local election results in England suggest that we are perhaps losing prospective Labour voters to the Greens and to the Lib Dems. And that’s something that I think the leadership should pay a lot of attention to.”

It’s not hard is it and that suggests that the omissions are quite deliberate and that no lessons have been learned from the last GE. And we know how that turned ot. As I say, depressing





 
What she could have said is “To have a Labour prime minister in Downing Street, we need to reconnect when those communities that once supported us but who have been turning away from us in growing numbers for the past 30 years. We need to find out why by first listening to them. We need to work with and support trade unions to rebuild and to organise workers in the private sector and we need to help communities to renew collective institutions that promote and provide social soldiery. To win we need an electoral coalition of the modern British working class: young and old, multi racial and across all parts of Britain. And the local election results in England suggest that we are perhaps losing prospective Labour voters to the Greens and to the Lib Dems. And that’s something that I think the leadership should pay a lot of attention to.”

It’s not hard is it and that suggests that the omissions are quite deliberate and that no lessons have been learned from the last GE. And we know how that turned ot. As I say, depressing
She's one of the few MPs in parliament who consistently refers to class, and to social movements as the key driver of change and referrent for her politics, but she didn't say exactly what you want so you're going to bitch and moan about it. This is why we can't have nice things.
 
Back
Top Bottom