Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jamaican removal flight

.
You mean You believe JLM without evidence and dismiss Vaz who most certainly knows more about it than you. Okay.

Ah, yes of course, Vaz = good, JRM = bad (vermin!) grr.

Thank you for boiling it down for me.
 
Ah, yes of course, Vaz = good, JRM = bad (vermin!) grr.

Thank you for boiling it down for me.

You don't have any answers to my questions so no surprise you'd attempt this distortion. :facepalm:

Your logic reflected back to you... Anything JRM and the gov says is true, you don't need to check, you have 100% trust in them. Vaz is wrong because....

1581723542654.png
 
I live in South Korea, been here for around 15 years, married and have kids.

If I broke the law here in such a way that I was put in prison I would be deported.

I don't see a problem with this. I just try to be a law abiding citizen, I don't go robbing houses or attacking people with knives.

Not something I'm worried about as I'm not going to break into people's homes or use knives to rob people.
 
I live in South Korea, been here for around 15 years, married and have kids.

If I broke the law here in such a way that I was put in prison I would be deported.

I don't see a problem with this. I just try to be a law abiding citizen, I don't go robbing houses or attacking people with knives.

Not something I'm worried about as I'm not going to break into people's homes or use knives to rob people.

Can also use this argument for hanging and stuff
 
I live in South Korea, been here for around 15 years, married and have kids.

If I broke the law here in such a way that I was put in prison I would be deported.

I don't see a problem with this. I just try to be a law abiding citizen, I don't go robbing houses or attacking people with knives.

Not something I'm worried about as I'm not going to break into people's homes or use knives to rob people.
You would be as well if you lived in most EU countries and had committed serious offences. I thnk the main issue (there may have been some cases where the criminal criteria could be challenged) on the Jamaican flight which some posters argue sets it apart is whether they should have been entitled to or given British citizenship or not.
 
Some of them deserve it.
But people who grew up here that's iffy and one of them is being kicked out for dangerous driving!
 
in a country were they are
Some of them deserve it.
But people who grew up here that's iffy and one of them is being kicked out for dangerous driving!

when can we start deporting white british people

who have already serve a sentence for a crime
 
One of these guys posted on a facebook thread. Said "I didn't do it" or something like that.

5 extra years for perverting the course of justice.
 
in a country were they are


when can we start deporting white british people

who have already serve a sentence for a crime

Every country does that non citizen get jailed get kicked out.
Now you can argue we should show some mercy to people who grew up here.
But if your not a citizen the state does not have to keep you.
 
My evidence?

Or checking for yourself, just to be sure?

(I don't have a dog in this fight, apart from being against this sickening racist policy)
Well any evidence outside off a quote from Facebook tbh . Dunno if you’ve ever worked with offenders but sometimes their version doesn’t tally with the truth .
 
Well any evidence outside off a quote from Facebook tbh . Dunno if you’ve ever worked with offenders but sometimes their version doesn’t tally with the truth .
I didn't get it from fb, I don't really do fb except to check for birthdays etc.

It was his mother on a radio phone-in, I think. One year for some fucking (I dunno) 'joint enterprise' thing for a nicked mobile phone then he got tagged in a fb thread and replied during the trial...saying"I didn't do it" afaik. 5 years for that.

Everyone knows what's going on.
 
I didn't get it from fb, I don't really do fb except to check for birthdays etc.

It was his mother on a radio phone-in, I think. One year for some fucking (I dunno) 'joint enterprise' thing for a nicked mobile phone then he got tagged in a fb thread and replied during the trial...saying"I didn't do it" afaik. 5 years for that.

Everyone knows what's going on.
Well i for one dont know whats going on without knowing the charges. I'm aware joint enterprise has now gone but nicking a mobile phone and joint enterprise sounds more like a robbery conviction tbh. rather than just a theft. Hard to know without the case details . Theres a clear criteria and threshhold for deportation and serious offences which I think was actually passed under Labour. As I've said before its the nationality issue that is the main debating issue here doubt if we would have the same furor if it was someone from an easterm EU state
 
Possible train fare dodger, been here since 10 years old. No criminal record, 10 GCSEs, having to turn down decent work. The absolute worst kind of person obviously. :facepalm:

For a year, he has been waiting to hear whether he will be charged for his unpaid train ticket – if he is convicted, he could be deported immediately.

 
Apparently these deportations were made under a 2007 act of Parliament that was passed when Labour were in office.
They bare three key pieces of legislation that have got us to this point, the first was passed in 2007 by a labour government; the subsequent 2 were passed by Tory governments. Useful summary here
In summary: We didn’t get to this in one step, and there is xenophobic crap spouted across all parts of the spectrum.
 
They bare three key pieces of legislation that have got us to this point, the first was passed in 2007 by a labour government; the subsequent 2 were passed by Tory governments. Useful summary here
In summary: We didn’t get to this in one step, and there is xenophobic crap spouted across all parts of the spectrum.

Outstanding summary, thanks for posting it.

Yet again, we see noisy "get tough" punishment used to mask systemic failings. In this case, Parliament's introduced exile for potentially trivial crimes (one case linked on Twitter was a bar brawl).

Authoritarian thuggery like this explains why I'll never share the worrying nostalgia I'm seeing from some for the Blair era. First time was bad enough, ta. At least we'll likely be spared similar for May's disastrous tenure, but these days, who knows.
 
Outstanding summary, thanks for posting it.

Yet again, we see noisy "get tough" punishment used to mask systemic failings. In this case, Parliament's introduced exile for potentially trivial crimes (one case linked on Twitter was a bar brawl).

Authoritarian thuggery like this explains why I'll never share the worrying nostalgia I'm seeing from some for the Blair era. First time was bad enough, ta. At least we'll likely be spared similar for May's disastrous tenure, but these days, who knows.
A brief scan of twitter shows me eugenics and compulsory contraception is today’s subject of discussion. So who the fuck knows
 
This would be fine if used with a bit of intelligence and compassion
length of stay in the UK if you grew up here you are our problem end of.
If you came here as an adult depends a decade of law-abiding behavior you can get away with one mistake.
Sorry guns rape etc no mercy.
Its the "zero-tolerance" approach that ends up being unfair.
Unfortunately, nobody loses votes by being tough on the crime you could probably win votes for branding speeders and red-light jumpers (especially cyclists) until Daily mail readers are being publicly branded in large numbers that you might get some resistance. A senior manager in the prison service tries to keep quiet about his job as most people are disappointed that HMPSS doesn't have torture chambers and sex offenders are not offered up to the general population to kill. :facepalm:.
God knows what Boris's government new ideas are but they certainly won't involve non-prison sentences.
We know what works it's not even that difficult it is expensive though.
Sober prisoners up get them employable get them out of their cells do something anything remotely constructive.
Then have them housed and not penniless when they leave Jail. They might not come back.
 
Last edited:

Up until 11 February 2020, 34 year-old Rayan Crawford had not set foot in Jamaica since he was 12 years old. In December 2019, some 18 months after the 'Windrush Scandal' had made international headlines, and by which time he had been convicted 10 times for a total of 22 offences, "he voted for Boris Johnson and thought he was going to be a good prime minister" ...





... on 11 February 2020, Mr Johnson - "who he thought he was going to be a good prime minister" - arranged for Rayan Crawford to be deported back to Jamaica !!!
 
Up until 11 February 2020, 34 year-old Rayan Crawford had not set foot in Jamaica since he was 12 years old. In December 2019, some 18 months after the 'Windrush Scandal' had made international headlines, and by which time he had been convicted 10 times for a total of 22 offences, "he voted for Boris Johnson and thought he was going to be a good prime minister" ...




... on 11 February 2020, Mr Johnson - "who he thought he was going to be a good prime minister" - arranged for Rayan Crawford to be deported back to Jamaica !!!


Alanis Morissette should definitely write a song about that
 
Back
Top Bottom