Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jamaican removal flight

In this thread Lee Jasper says between January 2016 and May 2018, 6,237 people were removed from planes while on the runway following successful legal challenges.

Which, doing the maths suggests an average 7 people every single day were being removed from a taxiing plane. Which seems crazy if true.
 
In this thread Lee Jasper says between January 2016 and May 2018, 6,237 people were removed from planes while on the runway following successful legal challenges.

Which, doing the maths suggests an average 7 people every single day were being removed from a taxiing plane. Which seems crazy if true.
If you look at the FOI 39thstep found in post 38 that looks entirely likely.
 
It’s getting worse and worse- this is the guy who had submitted an asylum claim and whose lawyer wasn’t told he was being deported
 

Attachments

  • 10608DB3-FFA1-46D8-AC03-C8B4FC3CC0CE.png
    10608DB3-FFA1-46D8-AC03-C8B4FC3CC0CE.png
    243.2 KB · Views: 28
You are miles off - the Tories want to draw attention to this. They think, correctly, that a message of 'we are taking tough action against foreign criminals' plays well with voters. They also benefit from the protests as it advances the insiders v outsiders war they recognise as central to their success and which they will seek to provoke at every opportunity.

And following on from this, I wonder to what extent Corbyn's attack on Johnson at PMQs will backfire, enabling the Tories to (continue to) portray Labour as being more interested in the rights and well being of criminals than in protecting the public from harm.
 
If you look at the FOI 39thstep found in post 38 that looks entirely likely.
Yeah, looking at figures contained here, it is a possible number...though it may also include those removed from what is defined as 'voluntary returns'?
I'm not claiming any expertise whatsoever, though.

1581524351829.png
 
It does seem like "get them on the plane regardless" is the tactic that the home office have decided is most effective - and probably with justification, as once you're out of the country (even if they don't "lose your documents") it is going to be a lot harder to fight a legal case let alone get back in, and there don't seem to be any consequences for having kicked them out.
 
It does seem like "get them on the plane regardless" is the tactic that the home office have decided is most effective - and probably with justification, as once you're out of the country (even if they don't "lose your documents") it is going to be a lot harder to fight a legal case let alone get back in, and there don't seem to be any consequences for having kicked them out.

Well no, who is going to get the home office in trouble? At its worst this stuff amounts to plain and simple kidnapping.
 
And following on from this, I wonder to what extent Corbyn's attack on Johnson at PMQs will backfire, enabling the Tories to (continue to) portray Labour as being more interested in the rights and well being of criminals than in protecting the public from harm.

I don't think Corbyn gives a fuck at this point. Can't say I blame him. It's a pity we didn't see more 'gloves off' stuff from him back when it could have made a difference.

Deferring to the tories' narrative that these are all dangerous criminals is hardly a better option is it?
 
And following on from this, I wonder to what extent Corbyn's attack on Johnson at PMQs will backfire, enabling the Tories to (continue to) portray Labour as being more interested in the rights and well being of criminals than in protecting the public from harm.

Hard to say. The racist, gammon vermin on social media are certainly overwhelmingly enraged by Corbyn's remarks, but they're unlikely to support Labour anyway. Maybe Corbyn just thought 'fuck it, I'm on my way out anyway, might as well have some fun with it'. Fair play to him I guess, a bit of levity is needed right now in this backward, racist and deeply ignorant toilet of a country.
 
I don't think Corbyn gives a fuck at this point. Can't say I blame him. It's a pity we didn't see more 'gloves off' stuff from him back when it could have made a difference.

Deferring to the tories' narrative that these are all dangerous criminals is hardly a better option is it?

I thought Corbyn's attack was unusually, for him, highly effective. Introducing class and colour by using Johnson's own foray into criminality in the way he did was smart. The problem is, as you suggest, nobody really gives a fuck what he says anymore and it probably won't cut through.

You are right too that Labour needs to get its head around the new rules of the game fast and find out how to play it. Nothing I've seen from any of the potential leaders convinces me that they are doing that however.
 
I am uncomfortable about these deportations, I would agree that people who have come in recent years and committed the most serious of offence, such as murder & rape, should be considered for deportation, but not in a case like this one, 25-year-old Rohan McLennon:




Corbyn brought this up today at PMQs - Boris dodged it by saying he couldn’t comment on individual cases or something like that.
 
Well no, who is going to get the home office in trouble? At its worst this stuff amounts to plain and simple kidnapping.
Samim Bigzhad was the Afghan kid whose illegal deportation got the then Home Secretary found in contempt of court. Twice. But what actually happened? She ended up resigning but for completely different reasons loads later... Noone went to prison, no one was censured for the tens of thousands spent, or the emotional distress. I guess if your only weapon is shame and they have no shame.... what are you left with?
 
Apparently these deportations were made under a 2007 act of Parliament that was passed when Labour were in office.
 
Apparently these deportations were made under a 2007 act of Parliament that was passed when Labour were in office.
So? Not only has that faction comprehensively lost control of the party, but they were criticized on here at the time (I did so myself). If a Labour government were doing this now, there's no reason to believe they'd be getting a pass.
 
Labour aren't in government now and haven't been for a decade. Governments change/amend laws/policies all the time if they want to. The cuntservatives are the ones who are deporting people now regardless of where you think the ability to do it originated.

So violent foreign criminals are being deported by the conservatives using powers passed by a prior Labour government, the latter of which just got wiped out at the GE and are now complaining of these deportations they originally passed the act to enable?

o-k.
 
The big difference is that although the laws have been in place for some time & prisoners have been routinely repatriated when they finish their sentences ( eg the legions of drug mules), this is being used to garner political points by seeking out and harvesting people who fall outside of the previously accepted conventions for deportation. Its a cunts trick
 
So violent foreign criminals are being deported by the conservatives using powers passed by a prior Labour government, the latter of which just got wiped out at the GE and are now complaining of these deportations they originally passed the act to enable?

o-k.
Yeah, but some are "foreign" in only the most achingly technical sense, aren't they? If Britain's the only country you can remember, you're a "foreigner" in name only.

This showy, get-tough government posturing's not only repulsive in itself, it's being used to disguise endemic failures in the CJS. I loathed it when Blair did it, and I loathe it just as much now Al Johnson's wallowing in it.
 
So violent foreign criminals are being deported by the conservatives using powers passed by a prior Labour government, the latter of which just got wiped out at the GE and are now complaining of these deportations they originally passed the act to enable?

o-k.
You're not even any good at this.
 
Possibly a thick question but how do other states approach situation eg it would seem fair to exclude those who arrived under age of 18, or I dunno spent five years as a minor in UK or something, from possible deportation following conviction/sentence, but I am completely ignorant about other countries legal approach
 
Possibly a thick question but how do other states approach situation eg it would seem fair to exclude those who arrived under age of 18, or I dunno spent five years as a minor in UK or something, from possible deportation following conviction/sentence, but I am completely ignorant about other countries legal approach
The ECHR article 8 is an important influence on deportation from any signatory state.
 
The ECHR article 8 is an important influence on deportation from any signatory state.

Yeah. People being dumped in a country they've never visited as an adult, have no memory of, with no friends/family/social ties (and no money or possessions) seems quite contrary to that doesn't it
 
There was an earlier reference in this thread to "giff-gaff" which I'd never heard of, nor did I know that was linked to O2,

At least, not prior to festivaldeb having had one of her asylum-seeking friends** very suddenly removed to Harmondsworth by the UK Border Agency (UKBA here is based in Bridgend).

**This man is a very poor Iranian Christian, 26 I think (I've also met him for a pint and chat a couple of times :) .
**Deb volunteers twice weekly for two refugee/asylum seeker support groups here in Swansea -- and she visited her friend in Harmondsworth -- nightmare experience for her, but especially for him obvs! :mad: )

That removal was a few weeks ago. Shortly after deb's visit to him, he was going to be deported from Heathrow to Amsterdam (NL being his first country of arrival originally). His English is quite poor, and, with giff-gaff, he had an utter nightmare trying to stay in contact with his lawyer and with his friends in Swansea -- including deb**


Luckily, the Home Office had cocked up with some legal technicality ( :confused:) at the court hearing (immigration tribunal? Not sure :oops: ) and he was released -- he's back in Swansea now, and very relieved.

I appreciate this isn't altogether relevant to this thread because he had never been to prison, but I thought I'd throw this into the thread anyway, for interest :) ... hope that's OK :oops:
 
Please share the evidence that everyone who has been or is set to be deported...add in those who were pulled off of thiis latest flight is a violent criminal.... I'll wait.

That is how JRM has categorised these deportees after taking questions from Valerie Vaz.

Make of it what you will, but Vaz came off appearing trying too hard to be dare I say - woke :facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom