Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Israel and hezbollah after the exploding pagers

No doubt about it if this invasion goes pear shaped we will be dragged into it and I have no wish to support Israel in any way at all.

Already involved in a limited way.


Not in Lebanon as such but in opposing Iranian missiles.

So in practise when it comes down to it this country is already supporting Israel militarily.

And help with training


I don't think this country should be giving Israel any military support whatsoever,
 
Last edited:
if you caught Netanyahu's "direct" appeal to the Iranian people it is possible to interpret his remarks as meaning that they the Iranian people should expect "regime change" in due course- meanwhile he was also expanding on Israel's ability to strike anywhere in the region at a time of its choosing. It is not outlandish to suppose that Israel could attack Iran- we know which side the US and therefore the UK would take in that eventuality- the wrong one as usual.
Israel and Iran frequently attack each other.
 
Disappointed to find out about UK military involvement already

Why?

(I doubt there was any kinetic UK involvement. we don't have much anti-ballistic missile capability - it's all on the T45 destroyers, and while there is one in the Med, it's a point defence capability, not a theatre wide one. I'd be genuinely surprised if UK involvement went further than radar picture from Cyprus and the RN in the Med, and signals intelligence)

Counter-argument: each successful Iranian missile strike in Israel pushes/pulls Israel towards a larger, harder retaliation. The less damage is done, the fewer Israelis skilled/injured, the less that Israel feels it 'needs' to teach Iran a lesson - not least because the 'lesson' is showing Iran to be unable to hurt Israel.

The April attacks are an example of this: huge effort by Iran, but minimal impact on Israel - Israel did retaliate, but it was relatively small scale stuff. Imagine how Israel would have retaliated if, instead of a dozen or so missiles getting through, a hundred had got through?
 

Does anyone know about rockets and stuff. If each Israeli defence missile is so expensive, what's to stop Iran launching hundreds of cheap dummy rockets - thereby depleting Israeli stock and costing them a fortune?

What's the flaw in my question? Is it that it wouldn't actually be cheap, or that it isn't feasible technically, or it's tactically pointless?
 

Does anyone know about rockets and stuff. If each Israeli defence missile is so expensive, what's to stop Iran launching hundreds of cheap dummy rockets - thereby depleting Israeli stock and costing them a fortune?

What's the flaw in my question? Is it that it wouldn't actually be cheap, or that it isn't feasible technically, or it's tactically pointless?


That’s effectively what the Iranian proxies do with their short range rockets. Most of them are solid fuel, not much bigger than the ones some ( extreme) hobbyists make here. They can put them together for a couple of hundred dollars each. The Israeli interceptors and other countermeasures are more expensive, $1000 to $100,000s per weapon. So far though Israel have been able to afford it.

The Iranian ballistic missiles are far far more expensive.i’d guess over $1m a weapon. So though they will have a lot it's unlikely they will have thousands and thousands to launch. They mostly used liquid fuelled rocket engines, the design taken from North Korea which can trace their developments via the Russians to the German V2s, but with much better guidance. But Iran has now moved to solid fuel motor missiles. I’m sure all round the world lots of people who used to spend their time sellotaping maps together are working out how many of both kinds were used last night and how much it all cost.
 
Last edited:
That’s effectively what the Iranian proxies do with their short range rockets. Most of them are solid fuel, not much bigger than the ones some ( extreme) hobbyists make here. They can put them together for a couple of hundred dollars each. The Israeli interceptors and other countermeasures are more expensive, $1000 to $100,000s per weapon. So far though Israel have been able to afford it.

The Iranian ballistic missiles are far far more expensive.i’d guess over $1m a weapon. So though they will have a lot it's unlikely they will have thousands and thousands to launch. They mostly used liquid fuelled rocket engines, the design taken from North Korea which can trace their developments via the Russians to the German V2s, but with much better guidance. But Iran has now moved to solid fuel motor missiles. I’m sure all round the world lots of people who spend used to spend their time sellotaping maps together are working out how many of both kinds were used last night and how much it all cost.
Keen but messy herb gardeners, with too much thyme on their hands
 
Back
Top Bottom