Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Reading Marx Necessary?

Toast Rider

Banned
Banned
To understand why capitalism is shit and to be able to articulate why?

I think it's shit. I've thought it was shit since before I even knew what it was. I've always felt at odds with how society works, it's just...that's how society works and you don't believe it can be any different.

So is Marx the only way to understand why this system's a bit of a shitshow?
 
No, I don't think it's necessary to read Marx. I find it useful. (Present tense because I find myself going back to passages for various reasons). But it's perfectly possible to develop as a decent human being, with the values of solidarity, cooperation, mutual aid, egalitarianism, freedom for all, mistrust of hierarchy, and so on, without having read any theory at all.

At least some theoretical grounding, though, is a good defence against all the dangerous conspiracy theory that floats around, with its links to anti-semitism, the far right, and just energy dissipating misdirection. With conspiracy more accessible now than ever, it's good to be able to counter it. But that can be done with Carl Sagan's "baloney detection kit", with frankly far less background reading needed.

But more than that, it's good to have the tools to analyse structures that are at the root of inequality and oppression.
 
Live, if propped up on stage counts.:(
head2.jpg

ruddy yurts recently
 
I agree with danny la rouge but I’d add two thoughts:

1. Knowing that something is ‘shit’ and fully understanding why it’s ‘shit’ are not the same. You can end up like Sleaford Mods or the SWP if you don’t understand why, how and when. Plus Marx doesn’t think capitalism is shit. Some of his best writing explores the amazing benefits of capitalism and its dynamism, creativity and energy. But within that is the kernal of its own destruction.

2. Given that we are living in a period of late capitalism where growth is permanently over for most, where living standards cannot rise and where capitalism isn’t cyclical but permanently breaking down the reasons as to why it’s still the only realistic show in town needs to be thought through. As Frederick Jamieson put it it’s a period where ‘it’s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism’

Finally Fozzie Bear is right about the starting point. If you can’t be bothered yet watch Harvey’s lectures on YouTube. They are absorbing and accessible.
 
Who else should I consider to provide a better analysis of capitalism ? anyone?

Noam Chomsky covers PR and foreign policy ... the best IMO.

Marx was just some rich cunt who stole the ideas of a bunch of northerners who were organizing their workplace... and got them wrong.
 
I think if I'd been brought up with communism I'd think it was shit. Certainly in my teenage years.
Until dying in a gulag, anyway...
 
Because the workers `feel` what they are doing. It is a revolutionary spirit .
Elitist twats like Marx just ponce about writing things down and thinking they are clever.
The movement comes from the people idiots.

Don`t you even know that?

YOU CAN`T EVEN THEORIES BASIC POLITICAL CONCEPTS YOU STUPID FOOLS!
 
Because the workers `feel` what they are doing. It is a revolutionary spirit .
Elitist twats like Marx just ponce about writing things down and thinking they are clever.
The movement comes from the people idiots.

Don`t you even know that?
Ok, calm down.

I'm specifically asking if any of the things he wrote down, while poncing, were of merit.

That doesn't preclude the value of movement and action. Obviously action is necessary, but knowledge precedes action, no?
 
Back
Top Bottom