FridgeMagnet
Administrator
Never going to happen.I want a second ref to bin brexit.
Never going to happen.I want a second ref to bin brexit.
Yeh the people will never be trusted with a referendum againNever going to happen.
I don't think his fudge is helping him electorally so I think it would. He is not making any headway as it is.Would the electoral forces behind Corbyn's fudge on Brexit magically change under Thornberry?
That is one example yes. Another is here where you specifically cite parliamentary (or party) politics as the most important factor in improving conditions for labour. I'm sorry but I don't think that I'm misrepresenting your position from those posts
IMO voting is pretty much apolitical so I don't disagree with you on that but your previous posts go a bit further than merely voting. You're arguing for party politics over class politics.
Wonderful, we can have a Labour government implementing "austerity" instead of a Tory one, just like 97-05.
Yvette Cooper would have a very similar policy to Corbyn as leader fwiw. She isn't one of the remain ultras. Aren't you following this stuff?someone like Yvette Cooper or Tristram Hunt as Leader of the Opposition right now. They'd lead the charge to stop Brexit and reverse the referendum and we'd probably have the Tories in another 10 years or more.
Not heard it called Personnel in years!
At mine, it went from personnel to HR and then back again. TBH, I don't use either term.
I mean, you've just done it again in this post. What you've linked to is my assessment on where we are - and you can certainly argue it's wrong - but what you've presented it as is my assessment of where we should be. 'Most important factor' is your phrase, not mine, and implies that this is a philosophy rather than commentary.That is one example yes. Another is here where you specifically cite parliamentary (or party) politics as the most important factor in improving conditions for labour. I'm sorry but I don't think that I'm misrepresenting your position from those posts
Yvette Cooper would have a very similar policy to Corbyn as leader fwiw. She isn't one of the remain ultras. Aren't you following this stuff?
Probably not tomorrow, but I don't see any reason to suppose it can't happen under any circumstance. If either front bench supported it, then it would be likely to pass. That could easily happen because Labour can't at any point decide to just sit on their hands, and there are a limited number of positions left for them to work through. And because the Tories are already quite close to having boxed themselves in to the extent that they will have to do whatever the EU requires (that might not mean a referendum, but it could) in order to secure an article 50 extension.It's not as if the commons will vote for a second referendum...
Second referendum or we quit Labour MPs, what's the thinking? It's not as if the commons will vote for a second referendum... Corbyn doesn't have the power to make it happen anyhow. Does anyone know the motivation here? Is it just to create a cleavage within the party?
No you used "biggest enabler" instead, hardly that a misrepresentation. And you then went on to state thatI mean, you've just done it again in this post. What you've linked to is my assessment on where we are - and you can certainly argue it's wrong - but what you've presented it as is my assessment of where we should be. 'Most important factor' is your phrase, not mine, and implies that this is a philosophy rather than commentary.
It's merely that PP has, after arriving at that point, become the dominant force for either change or lack of it.
Most people of whatever class look for leadership and lean heavily on the ideas and work of others, most people are malleable.....And so again when a vacuum is produced, something will fill it, and if you don't want it to be e.g. Yaxley Lennon, there had better be a workable counter.
You can't make statements like these and then argue that your politics isn't PP (you term) driven.I think there's a lot of latitude that comes with the starting point of one of the strongest economies,
What do you mean by austerity? The set of policies implemented by governments since 2007?Or is it a specific result of austerity as inflicted on councils and as selected by the national government?
What's the evidence these Labour MPs are going to quit besides the Guardian advert, the same one they've been running for the last two years?Second referendum or we quit Labour MPs, what's the thinking? It's not as if the commons will vote for a second referendum... Corbyn doesn't have the power to make it happen anyhow. Does anyone know the motivation here? Is it just to create a cleavage within the party?
No evidence, Im asking about the thinking/strategy behind it. It doesnt really make any sense on any levelWhat's the evidence these Labour MPs are going to quit besides the Guardian advert, the same one they've been running for the last two years?
I'm sure it does, from their perspectiveNo evidence, Im asking about the thinking/strategy behind it. It doesnt really make any sense on any level
I think the thinking is “This is what ‘my public’ want to hear me saying”.No evidence, Im asking about the thinking/strategy behind it. It doesnt really make any sense on any level
Politics-as-Twitter-post.Its weird, its likely an empty threat as to whether they'll follow through, but more importantly its a demand that cant be met. The call for a vote of no confidence was the same nonsense/charade - Corbyn did it in the end and now its off the table.
Well, she campaigned in the general election promising her constituents in the general election campaign that she would never block brexit and her proposed amendment - drawn up with Nick Bowles, who also doesn't want to stop brexit, and currently withdrawn again because there's no chance ATM of getting enough support for it - is explicitly to avoid a no deal cliff edge.Well, hang on, she's not demanding a second ref but she's trying to build cross party support for an amendment that would force an extension of A50. Which looks to me like a much more sensible tactic if you want to stop Brexit to me.
Be a credible leader?.What do you think Thornberry would do differently?
What do you mean "real"?.nothing real then. just 'not him'.
Brexit has cost UK economy at least £80bn since vote – Bank rate-setter
Gertjan Vlieghe’s estimate for weekly cost of Brexit – £800m – is more than double Vote Leave said could be spent on NHS
Investment avoids uncertainty, I guess, and the last two years have been nothing if not uncertain. It's still uncertain. So an argument there would be that once it is done, however it is done really, the uncertainty reduces and investment returns, perhaps with a bit of a spike if some of that investment has merely been delayed rather than withdrawn. That could give a bit of a misleading picture of a 'brexit bounce' when in reality it is just recovering some of the lost ground caused by the brexit process. I hate to think of the kinds of 'incentives' that will be produced by a post-brexit government to bring investment back. To the bottom we race...
Well, she campaigned in the general election promising her constituents in the general election campaign that she would never block brexit and her proposed amendment - drawn up with Nick Bowles, who also doesn't want to stop brexit, and currently withdrawn again because there's no chance ATM of getting enough support for it - is explicitly to avoid a no deal cliff edge.
Maybe that's all bluff though.