Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
Have any of the remainarian crowd tested the legality of UK citizens (>45yrs) retaining EU citizenship on the basis that they were born in the EU?
There was some talk early on about current British passport holders being able to pay for some kind of EU citizenship extension to their passport. But it seems to have been nonsense.

As for those who were born EU citizens; their citizenship status will be changed whether or not they like it. It’s a bureaucratic relationship, not an identity (which is a word that would need to be defined anyway).
 
There was some talk early on about current British passport holders being able to pay for some kind of EU citizenship extension to their passport. But it seems to have been nonsense.

As for those who were born EU citizens; their citizenship status will be changed whether or not they like it. It’s a bureaucratic relationship, not an identity (which is a word that would need to be defined anyway).
But isn't birth geography the basis for much citizenship/passport holding with state entities?
 
At some point, all British citizens will cease to be EU citizens, so the status of many millions of current EU citizens is going to change after Brexit. Everyone is suggesting that. It's kind of the point.

I think that March, 2016 tweet was an attempt to assure EU nationals residing in the UK that their status wouldn't be affected by a Brexit vote.

Because of course, Brexiting would be an orderly process, and a Brexit vote wouldn't result in years of uncertainty and worry for millions of EU citizens residing in the UK.
 
It’s a bureaucratic relationship, not an identity (which is a word that would need to be defined anyway).
It just shows how slippery those words are. In one sense, bureaucratic credentials are only verified identity you have. Passport, driving license, birth certificate, council tax bills. These are “ID”. So it’s not surprising people get confused about what “identity” actually means.

Which is why definitions are important when discussing these things.
 
The EU isn't a nation.

It's being used by Hannan and the Home Office to denote "people from Europe". Citizens of nations that are within the EU but aren't the UK.
Yes, I know. But the lack of precision is a problem. The British Isles will continue to be part of Europe even when the UK nation-state leaves the EU. So in that sense residents on these islands will continue to be “people from Europe”.
 
There was some talk early on about current British passport holders being able to pay for some kind of EU citizenship extension to their passport. But it seems to have been nonsense.

As for those who were born EU citizens; their citizenship status will be changed whether or not they like it. It’s a bureaucratic relationship, not an identity (which is a word that would need to be defined anyway).
Was here:
What's stopping the EU from handing out (real) EU passports: i.e ones that aren't printed & distributed by a nation state but the EU itself in Brussels - where a holder would be a proto European of full integration?
As Tommers said, seems that not being a nation state would put a block to it.
The EU isn't a state, it doesn't have any territory under its exclusive control so the holder of such a passport would have to live in a member state thus making themselves subject to that countries rules
I'm not entirely convinced. When states can get tricky with things like tax havens and the vatican, surely the EU could create a nation state the size of a postage stamp somewhere in their car park and offer all the remainers a citizenship (and let any citizen from any other EU nation apply while they're at it).. Would keep everyone happy and serve as a prototype/ forerunner to fast track federal expansion and all these 'reforms' that everyone keeps pipe-dreaming about, but never actually get off the ground.
 
Last edited:
The EU isn't a nation.

It's being used by Hannan and the Home Office to denote "people from Europe". Citizens of nations that are within the EU but aren't the UK.

Why the distinction between supra-state & state? If the entity confers citizenship based upon birth geography or residence (as it does) then those born on/after 01/01/1973 must have a strong claim upon retention of citizenship whatever the political decision of the sub-state (formerly) sharing sovereignty?
 
Why the distinction between supra-state & state? If the entity confers citizenship based upon birth geography or residence (as it does) then those born on/after 01/01/1973 must have a strong claim upon retention of citizenship whatever the political decision of the sub-state (formerly) sharing sovereignty?

The Wikipedia page on EU citizenship has a section on this question, with some references to the legal opinions.

Citizenship of the European Union - Wikipedia
 
Why the distinction between supra-state & state? If the entity confers citizenship based upon birth geography or residence (as it does) then those born on/after 01/01/1973 must have a strong claim upon retention of citizenship whatever the political decision of the sub-state (formerly) sharing sovereignty?
Of course one of the purposes/advantages of the EU (and other trans-national entities) is that like states it facilities the exploitation of labour but does not have to accede to the same level of social contract that states are still required to do.
 
Of course one of the purposes/advantages of the EU (and other trans-national entities) is that like states it facilities the exploitation of labour but does not have to accede to the same level of social contract that states are still required to do.
Yes, the 'contract' being at one remove from the people; nation states giving up (sharing) sovereignty in return for free market/neoliberal security.
 
if it's class credentials you want, I was born and raised on council estates in your eastern neigbouring SE London borough and there's no other consequence of brexit I'd more enjoy than to see the banking sector fuck off to Frankfurt, for exactly the reasons you mention.

Can you see the EU improving any of those things if we remain? Convince me

No.

imo Tory austerity cuts affects on my area in London would be happening regardless of EU membership. Unlike other EU countries UK was not in Euro and had more leeway in dealing with the economic crisis.

I do agree effect of Brexit is weakening of London as financial centre. Which will have knock on effect of possibly slowing down gentrification. As it has been growth in importance of the City post Thatchers Big Bang that has driven gentrification of London.

I'm not great fan of EU. What happened to Greece for example. I didn't llke referendum as it had so much about immigration/ getting "our" borders back in run up to it. Having a partner from another EU country and having friends / workmates from other EU countries coloured my views. Brexit is affecting me personally.

My partner ias worried about her future here. My Polish friend is staying as she has husband and life here after being here 10 years. The referendum result made her not feel welcome here. She is going down the route of trying to get British citizenship which is not an easy process. She doesn't trust promises of status of non UK EU nationals to be the same after Brexit. And shes seen what happened to Windrush generation.

I don't think a Peoples Vote is good idea. It would cause even more resentment and anger in some parts of country. Though some friends of mine would like it.

I'm pessimistic about anything good coming out of this.
 
Last edited:
No.

imo Tory austerity cuts affects on my area in London would be happening regardless of EU membership. Unlike other EU countries UK was not in Euro and had more leeway in dealing with the economic crisis.

I do agree effect of Brexit is weakening of London as financial centre. Which will have knock on effect of possibly slowing down gentrification. As it has been growth in importance of the City post Thatchers Big Bang that has driven gentrification of London.

I'm not great fan of EU. What happened to Greece for example. I didn't llke referendum as it had so much about immigration/ getting "our" borders back in run up to it. Having a partner from another EU country and having friends / workmates from other EU countries coloured my views. Brexit is affecting me personally.

My partner ias worried about her future here. My Polish friend is staying as she has husband and life here after being here 10 years. The referendum result made her not feel welcome here. She is going down the route of trying to get British citizenship which is not an easy process. She doesn't trust promises of status of non UK EU nationals to be the same after Brexit. And shes seen what happened to Windrush generation.

I don't think a Peoples Vote is good idea. It would cause even more resentment and anger in some parts of country. Though some friends of mine would like it.

I'm pessimistic about anything good coming out of this.
It's all a huge clusterfuck
 
Archaeologists in yucatan have uncovered a new panel illustrating the mayan end of days showing what appears to be theresa may removing a star from a circle of 12 stars
 
As we head towards the cliff.

Why is it good to take away people’s rights?

It’s a good thing right? It must happen. To benefit the people; they *must* have restrictions.

They must not be allowed to move.

Why is this good?

Those in favour of Brexit must explain to those who are losing their rights why it is worth it.
 
Back
Top Bottom