What are you as a remainer doing about this to find solutions ? Open borders doesn't seem to be an option for the Eu, so i can't understand why you voted remain.
Don't vote for migrant camps!
You appear to believe we have a direct democracy. Voters, whether remain or leave, will by and large not be "sorting out the problems" of the process.
can anyone tell me what the crucial difference between teleportation devices and borders between nation states is?
Not so sure. It wouldn't make things easier for her if the Brexit faithful were telling each other fairy tales about a Trump rescue.
The man-child vents… "Trump lets rip":
I think this should be printed on a t-shirt, which kabbes then wears during a tour of Ireland, perhaps on a penny-farthing, stopping in at pubs and suchlike to chat to locals. This is made into a light hearted film or TV series, a bit like the one with that guy who hitch hiked around the island with a fridge.
Have you gone Irish-Border-happy n all?
Interesting that you should take what I said and then claim it was in reply to a different set of circumstances. That's really quite dishonest of you. I wonder if you know you did it.
Something that nobody has said interpreted in a way nobody implied. Look absurdity!
It's an interesting idea, but I think it would work better with philosophical wearing the t-shirt, given that it's essentially his position.
The same way it works everywhere else in the world, of course.
No I didn’t. Not even close.
You have repeatedly said that leave voters should sort it out. I can quote the posts if you wish. If you say that this does not mean getting involved in the negotiations (which is what needs to be sorted, since that is where we're at with Brexit), then you need to explain i) precisely what you think needs to be sorted by voters and ii) how they should sort it.
It was a response to your repeated demand for voters to sort it. Direct democracy is when the electorate is directly involved in the "sorting". The usual example is ancient Athens (although obviously slaves, women, etc were not counted). You seemed to imagine we had this instead of a representative democracy, which if you have read Edmund Burke you'll know does not allow for MPs to be seen even as delegates, but as people we empower to get on with it.
What is the point of this observation, though? Is it a version of the new liberal orthodoxy that only experts should be allowed to vote? That the electorate was not competent? That they did not read up on constitutional law before voting? If that's not what you're implying, then be specific. What does your observation mean in practical terms, since you seem to be demanding practicality.
Please enlighten us as to what you think the context in 2016 was.
Yes, but there is no general election on the horizon. So now what?
Was Trump going to buy all our shit then ?
You can post it as many times as you like, for all the good it will do. You haven't used those exact words, but that is the clear implication of your posts, taken as a whole.
Exactly so.
You are simply wrong. It is not the clear implication of my posts taken as a whole.
My apologies, you said a few years of a hard border may focus thinking, you did not say it was a good idea, you were suggesting soething. I read you srong.
