Interesting post. Shame the first part isn't actually true.
I’m sorry — in what way, exactly, are you “interested” in these solutions? You’ve already said they’re nothing to do with you, you have no stake in how they could be implemented and you’ve no interest in feeding into any process to make them better. You’ve washed your hands of it, which is the exact opposite of being “interested”. It’s bad faith all the way down.
Stretching your bad faith angle out of shape I think. I am interested in the 'solutions' because they may well have a practical impact on me, I don't have any solutions to suggest because I can't think of one that will work and still be called brexit, and I also have no solutions to suggest because I didn't vote for it in the first place and I would love the process to disintegrate not through my doing, but ironically through the actions of those brexit voters who thought they could manage the process, yet they are tying themselves in knots.
I have not dismissed that 'solution' out of hand, indeed I quoted the part of the GFA (clause six I think) earlier for clarity. I have repeatedly suggested a workable solution needs to be found, and I don't think a United Ireland will sell to the Tory mates the DUP.
By your logic, those who did not vote for the Tories or DUP also don’t have to present solutions.
My opening part of my first post on this thread was in the form of a question.
And very enlightening for the rest of us as regards what you really think it was too.
I accept it is a problem for everybody living here, but finding a solution is down to the brexiters.
because if you don't you look like a muppet
Don't what?
Of course there's a collective consensus that you're being utterly dishonest when you seek to pretend that your question was genuine and not a juvenile attempt at a smear job - one that you clearly are used to using unchallenged.
Read your question in the post quoted starting why you daft apathetic twat
There were two questions, which one do you mean?
)
This is absolute claptrap. The inevitable end to the argument is that the only people ever responsible for anything -- even to the extent of suggesting ideas -- are those who voted for absolutely every stage of the process.
No it's not you fool. How can the electorate find or for that matter impliment solutions that only mps have the power to do so.
You are mistaken. If you read back I said two things. That there is logic and logic, and that logic suggests, not dictates. My mentioning of 1994 was not a comment regarding your knowledge of Ionesco, but one about the logic of his knowing what was written in 2018, 24 years after he had died.I am aware of when he died, having had brief correspondence with him during 1993 while living in France and being a new fan of his work at the time. I did notice when he passed.
But the reason I mention this (other than the blatant but cool name drop) is because pulling your Logic Dictates card just there exemplifies your problem in this thread. You seem to be posting from a position where other people's other attitudes and experiences and knowledges and understandings are irrelevant or just non existent. Like there, you assumed I wasn't aware of when someone died, whom I had just quoted. Just as you apparently aren't aware or don't care that people voted Leave for more and better reasons than the ones you insist must have motivated them. You don't even seem interested in hearing about that, as in you didn't even read this thread before jumping in with both feet, insults and implicit accusations.
Absurd.
(See? I'm reduced to literary puns now
