Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hurricane Sandy - "Perfect Storm"

The media we watch covers the news where the reporters live, and what they think is important to them.
 
200.000 are homeless in Haiti with emergency shelter available to only 17.000. The worse humanitarian disaster may still be ahead as crops have been destroyed, the economy is in tatters and disease is spreading. That poor country never gets a break.

It's not all the weather's fault though. Haiti has been politically and economically persecuted throughout its existence, because of its history. Natural disasters affect it worse than anywhere else because it has been systematically and deliberately impoverished for two centuries. The Haitian revolution was the most important, and the most potentially dangerous to Capital, in all history. They've never been forgiven for it.
 
I could be wrong, but I doubt he will.

It is in the interests of the governing class to keep the population in a state of intermittent panic. Furthermore it is in the interests of the media to whip up panic at every opportunity, and no politician will want to cross the media.

Also, as we've seen several times on this thread, anyone who points out such home truths immediately becomes vulnerable to the kind of cheap moralism propagated by idiots like Temper Tantrum. "Oh how dare you say it was exaggerated when this person was killed/ that building collapsed/ that area flooded, you must be a heartless beast" etc etc. Such vile tactics can be very effective, and Romney won't want to be on the end of them.

But the truth of the matter is that scaremongering was rife, as it frequently is in the Western media. Wise people will ask what interests it serves.

You've got yourself a false dichotomy there, Phil. It's perfectly possible to want to use this thread for news rather than dicking around like a performing seal pup in front of an adulatory audience of about 3 people, without that meaning one believes this is the biggest disaster since the Indian Ocean tsunami.
Still, keep it coming. Some folks clearly have nowt better to do than be trolled by you.
 
Just for gabi



You know what pisses me off about the reporting of this?

60+ people are dead in Haiti and a dozen in Cuba because of this storm. Some 200.000 are homeless in Haiti, 137.000 homes are damaged in Cuba. There is also extensive infrastructure damage in the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico and the Bahamas yet the disaster in those countries barely get a mention.




Not been really paying attention tot eh news this past few days but this New York thing is all over the place.
Tucked in somewhere in the reports is that 45 have already died in the Caribbean.


Haven't seen any, but plenty in the countries hit before the US, although there was a British Banker

Let's hope there aren't any more
 
l6HMd.jpg

reminds me of that pic of St.Paul's during the blitz.

st-pauls-blitz.jpg
 
According the media I have just watched it will cost $20 billion the most expensive natural disaster in the history of. On the BBC World News on television earlier it showed the flooded lower Manhatton area with all its damage. Then they went to Times Square where they showed that apart from there being wet streets from heavy rain the lights were on and taxis were going about their business. However some very big companies have had to close down and the US Stock market will be closed for 2 days at least. This is a first they say.
 
To be fair to Phil and his assertion that everythinbg will be back to normal and thos arguing with him, i wonder how many of them have been to NYC during an event like this.

Obviously this one is off the scale but NYC is a very resilient city and as much as they lack out stiff upper lip they know how to get things done.

Altho not on the same scale i have been in NYC several times in blizzards that make the worst I have seen in UK look like a light snow fall. well over a foot of snow in a copule of hours and still everyone wnet about their business and the next morning you'd wonder if it had snowed at all.

After the two tallest buildings in the world fell on the same day they had the site cleared in a matter of months. In the Uk we'd still be deciding how to clear up the mess.
 
You need to appreciate that cities like NY, London, Paris, LA, Tokyo etc are always going to be bigger news simply because they all have a far greater media image. They are the birth places of the modern media - they've been playing it for far longer than places like Istanbul.

We are all very familiar with images of these cities even if we have never actually visited. Films familiarise us with the people and culture. This doesn't happen in Haiti, or Istanbul on quite the same level.

The storm could have it NY directly with greater effect and a higher cost to human life and financial costs. But, it is a modern city with good resources. The storm wasn't 100% predictable. They prepared for the worst - it didn't come. The media played it for every last penny. As Dwyer points out, this is the biggest reason for a lack of coverage in Haiti - less consumers with spare cash. It is that simple.

Everyone reading here will be benefitting in some way from the system we all live in. Before anyone starts pointing fingers take a good look at yourself with your internet and gadgets.

I thought Mr Dwyers sporadic webcam fame was good fun. Seems no-one was drowning, or in need of rescue. What was the harm in it?
 
To be fair to Phil and his assertion that everythinbg will be back to normal and thos arguing with him, i wonder how many of them have been to NYC during an event like this.

Obviously this one is off the scale but NYC is a very resilient city and as much as they lack out stiff upper lip they know how to get things done.

Altho not on the same scale i have been in NYC several times in blizzards that make the worst I have seen in UK look like a light snow fall. well over a foot of snow in a copule of hours and still everyone wnet about their business and the next morning you'd wonder if it had snowed at all.

After the two tallest buildings in the world fell on the same day they had the site cleared in a matter of months. In the Uk we'd still be deciding how to clear up the mess.

I still remember the 1987 "Michael Fish" storm in London which was of comparable strength even if, rather crucially, there wasn't much flooding. The day after looked apocalyptic, but two days later London was more or less back on its feet.
 
249331_458753600832924_1718682744_n.jpg

Over a million people have been displaced. Tens of thousands have been moved into camps that are ill-equipped to receive them. Crop fields and fisheries in their thousands of hectares are completely flooded and destroyed. Local food shortages seem inevitable. In overcrowded camps with poor sanitation, the spread of infectious disease also seems inevitable. Nigeria right now http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn...dia-ignoring-nigeria-flooding/?iref=allsearch
 
Meanwhile, in Haiti, 52 victims of the same storm are buried (if they're lucky). Not one mention of this on 30 pages of this thread.

Classy.
There have actually been several mentions of deaths elsewhere (Haiti, the Caribbean etc) earlier in this thread, including a few links to news reports.
 
I still remember the 1987 "Michael Fish" storm in London which was of comparable strength even if, rather crucially, there wasn't much flooding. The day after looked apocalyptic, but two days later London was more or less back on its feet.
Wasn't on a full moon
 
RE: post #913 The 'Michael Fish Storm' may have had no apparent effect in London after two days had passed, but in the West Country in South Devon when I went there the following August the coastline looked very different to how it had been. Hundreds of trees along the coast had been wiped away leaving familiar landmarks changed for ever and some were still down blocking paths along the coastal woods all those months afterwards. It may not have killed many people but livelyhoods were affected in poor rural areas where there is no margin of resilience because of their economic situation. This will also be true in parts of America hit by this recent storm and flood water outside of the big cities but on a much bigger scale because of the size of the country.
 
meant the tides at highest even without storm surge:facepalm:

While it was a contributing factor, the main reason why NYC got flooded so badly is that it's right by the ocean. London isn't. An ocean is a vastly lager body of water than the Thames. Not sure you've noticed that difference.
 
You've got yourself a false dichotomy there, Phil. It's perfectly possible to want to use this thread for news rather than dicking around like a performing seal pup in front of an adulatory audience of about 3 people, without that meaning one believes this is the biggest disaster since the Indian Ocean tsunami.
Still, keep it coming. Some folks clearly have nowt better to do than be trolled by you.

Hang on. We had someone on the ground in NYC giving feedback whilst it was happening and that is 'trolling'?

He can't have been lying in his account because he was on camera at the time and what he was saying was observably true.
 
200.000 are homeless in Haiti with emergency shelter available to only 17.000. The worse humanitarian disaster may still be ahead as crops have been destroyed, the economy is in tatters and disease is spreading. That poor country never gets a break.
You had no interest in the storms damage to Haiti until this storm hit the US.
 
Hang on. We had someone on the ground in NYC giving feedback whilst it was happening and that is 'trolling'?

He can't have been lying in his account because he was on camera at the time and what he was saying was observably true.

And to be fair he was being egged on to do it by us on here!
 
I'm sure they tried to hype up a tidal issue on a particular day in the UK sometime in the last few years, but it didnt come to anything.
 
Reno: If you are undecided whether you want to go to NYC or not I think you might be able to make a few quid, If you go to airport it seems likely that the flight will be over subscribed. Virgin are quite likley to ask for volunteers to get off flight and they usually offer big incentives to do this. If you have hotels you can cancel and get ya money back you are quite likley to get a new flight, probably with an upgrade and may even some cash back too. I've never been in a position to be able to get off a flight cos of business etc, but have been sorely tempted with some of the inducements they offer. Of course if you cant get the money back on ya hotels I'd go, I'm sure you'll have a good time anyway, altho some attractions may be shut.
 
Back
Top Bottom