I was quite pleased to find out I could explain how (and why) a turbocharger worked.I know the offside rule...
Not as sure about engines but if pushed I could possibly explain.
I was quite pleased to find out I could explain how (and why) a turbocharger worked.
The only bit I can remember about the offside rule is the bit with the goat and the lime jelly.
Ah! So I got that completely the wrong way round. Thanks for explaining. Makes perfect sense.No - because for a given volume of air, you can mix a given amount of fuel into it, in order to get the ideal combustion ratio. Turbochargers allow you to add more air, and so more fuel, so power is increased.
This thread is most instructive!Carburettors... In the picture in the OP, fuel is injected directly ('direct injection') into the cylinder, which is relatively modern. Before that, it was mixed in the intake port, and the air entering the engine was a fuel/air mix. How do you make the mix? Well, before direct injection, it was still done with electronically controlled injectors - same thing, just not direct. But before that, it was mixed with a mechanical device, and that was a carburettor.
Some cars electronically assist the turbo now - spooling it up before exhaust gases get chance to. This is sometimes called 'mild hybrid'.The potential disadvantage of turbochargers is that you have to have enough exhaust pressure to make them spin and to then have their effect. Hence you can get what is known as turbo lag, where you don't get the boost until the engine is spinning at a good rate. Superchargers don't have to have that disadvantage because they can be geared to blow strongly at lower revs.
I believe Mercedes kompressor models have superchargers rather than turbochargers.
Physics.So with a jet engine - and a rocket engine - how does the expanded gas cause the forward motion? In a physics way. The colder air is more dense so - bear with me - is it kind of like if you had a balloon and you blew up the balloon against, I dunno, a piece of wood, the piece of wood would move cos you're pushing it with the expanded gas filled balloon?
Newtonian physics. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So if you're going to expel gas as part of this process, something has to happen in return, and that's moving the projectile through the air.So with a jet engine - and a rocket engine - how does the expanded gas cause the forward motion? In a physics way. The colder air is more dense so - bear with me - is it kind of like if you had a balloon and you blew up the balloon against, I dunno, a piece of wood, the piece of wood would move cos you're pushing it with the expanded gas filled balloon? In this illustration, the piece of wood represents the engine and therefore 5he plane and the wood is the air around it getting pushed put of the way.
Yep. Got it. Thank you!Newtonian physics. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So if you're going to expel gas as part of this process, something has to happen in return, and that's moving the projectile through the air.
A two stroke is arguably much simpler than a four stroke.Steady on mate! How about you tell me how a 2 stroke engine works first. Which are the stages missing from the 4 stroke?
Fuck yes please! Believe it or not, I was a real science kid and have a degree in chemistry. Physics I found very difficult but it's all absolutely fascinating. And I just love things like massive Victorian beam engines.Let us know when you want us to explain the ion drive, and nuclear pulse propulsion, Mrs Miggins.
Nuclear pulse propulsion - build a spaceship with huge shock absorbers and a massive chunk of steel on the other end of them, drop small nuclear bombs out the back, and accelerate to a significant proportion of the speed of light (eventually).Fuck yes please! Believe it or not, I was a real science kid and have a degree in chemistry. Physics I found very difficult but it's all absolutely fascinating. And I just love things like massive Victorian beam engines.
Cor! Say what you like about humans but we're bloody brilliantNuclear pulse propulsion - build a spaceship with huge shock absorbers and a massive chunk of steel on the other end of them, drop small nuclear bombs out the back, and accelerate to a significant proportion of the speed of light (eventually).
Project Orion (nuclear propulsion) - Wikipedia
Mazda 787B - WikipediaYes, and a rotary / wankel engine'd Mazda once won the Le Mans 24 hour motor race.
I forget which year it was, but I was there!! The car made a sort of screaming sound which was very different from the other more conventional racecars that weekend.
Well, it doesn't HAVE to be a spaceship, but with that propulsion method, it's pretty inevitably going to end up in space whatever you doCor! Say what you like about humans but we're bloody brilliant
I do like the way you casually say "build a spaceship"
Where are these things employed?Someone might as well throw rotaries into the mix.
Where are these things employed?
and large ships!..two strokes ... mainly remain the preserve of small motorcycles, chain saws and the like. Trabbants had two stroke engines.
The Mazda RX-8 has two of them.Car and motorcycle engines. The first car I saw with a rotary engine was a neighbour’s NSU back in the early seventies. A lad who was an apprentice with me had a Suzuki bike with a rotary engine.
As mentioned above Mazda are one of the car makers that utilise these recently.
Oh interesting, I had no idea.and large ships!
Marine slow speed 2-stroke engines are the most thermally efficient heat engines there are.
...and next year they might start burning low super fuel