krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
On one island over here, monkeys and deer hang out
Be even worse for them if they eat an alive one.Wolves will just need to eat one dead hiker or climber and will be wiped out again.
Yeah, that would be worse. Not sure if wolves hunt and eat people doubt if some climber falls to their death they wouldn't pass up free meat though.Be even worse for them if they eat an alive one.
Having wolves and bears (especially polar bears) in the UK would make hiking much more exciting.Yeah, that would be worse. Not sure if wolves hunt and eat people doubt if some climber falls to their death they wouldn't pass up free meat though.
aye lbj, i hear you, and of course i ache to see property relations revolutionised so that the aristocrats and corporations grip of the land is broken and replaced with democratic stewardship. Trouble is, in my misanthropic dotage i can feel myself losing optimism with each passing day. Our area of Scotland, although beautiful to the casual observer, is replete with monocultured crop fields of green or yellow or purple, offering an impression of wildness and nature - when actually it is pretty sterile terrain which has been so bulldozed or drained over time by agribusiness practices that it can appear 'green', when actually it aint. Acreages of regimented fast growing conifers which sustain nothing much in the way of wildlife are also become the norm. i'm afraid we have largely lost the magic of the properly wild areas, and it saddens me. i think i know where Monbiot is coming from. Humanity has to get a balance between the natural world and itself, at the moment there isn't one.I think it's an idea that has legs, but only alongside other ideas and other considerations. I find some of the assumptions behind it questionable. What is 'wild'? Its definition appears to be something like 'an environment without humans in it'. Well that's not the world we live in, and it appears to include ideas of human exceptionalism, placing us somehow apart from nature rather than part of it. In many parts of the world, including the UK, most environments are going to have humans doing their human things in them or nearby. How do we produce healthy, sustainable, biodiverse environments with humans in them or nearby? That's a harder but perhaps more fruitful question to address.
I agree that one of the main things humanity needs to learn is that The Environment isn’t something over there, while Humanity is something over here.I think it's an idea that has legs, but only alongside other ideas and other considerations. I find some of the assumptions behind it questionable. What is 'wild'? Its definition appears to be something like 'an environment without humans in it'. Well that's not the world we live in, and it appears to include ideas of human exceptionalism, placing us somehow apart from nature rather than part of it. In many parts of the world, including the UK, most environments are going to have humans doing their human things in them or nearby. How do we produce healthy, sustainable, biodiverse environments with humans in them or nearby? That's a harder but perhaps more fruitful question to address.
We are the world, we are the childrenI agree that one of the main things humanity needs to learn is that The Environment isn’t something over there, while Humanity is something over here.
We are part of the environment: at the atomic level, we are carbon and water and minerals made from elements forged in ancient stars. At the individual level, we breathe the oxygen, eat the organic matter, live on the soil of the planet, and eventually return to it. At the species level, we roam and herd over the planet’s surface, using its resources, while shaping and being shaped by its processes. We are the environment, and the environment is us.
Well, yes. I know it sounds simplistic, but I think it’s a genuinely deep perceptual error in human thinking.We are the world, we are the children
Am in agreement with you, just that bloody song came to mindWell, yes. I know it sounds simplistic, but I think it’s a genuinely deep perceptual error in human thinking.
Having wolves and bears (especially polar bears) in the UK would make hiking much more exciting.
Yeah, that would be worse. Not sure if wolves hunt and eat people doubt if some climber falls to their death they wouldn't pass up free meat though.
That's the main reason that estates have controlled burning on the heather to produce lots of new growth.
This, 'wild animal x will destroy their food source unless we kill them all' thing was crap when it was sparrowhawks eradicating garden birds, crap when badgers were murdering all the hedgehogs and crap now deer are eating all the trees.
Natural systems are not steady-state, there are booms and busts. You can't claim to care about living things and then whinge about them behaving as all living things do. Stop breeding sheep and cattle for slaughter, leave the land and the creatures on it to do their own thing and see whether we still have a problem with excess wild herbivores or if the problem was us all along.
British people are notoriously unfit so the presence of apex predators with a taste for human flesh would also do wonders for the nation's health.As someone who hikes in Griz country... yes, it does. You know to follow certain rules to improve your chances of safety and keep alert to changes in your environment.
We have apex predators already! Badgers.British people are notoriously unfit so the presence of apex predators with a taste for human flesh would also do wonders for the nation's health.
Badgers are lovely but not as cute as a polar bear - they're just giant teddiesWe have apex predators already! Badgers.
Badgers are lovely but not as cute as a polar bear - they're just giant teddies
And I've never heard of badgers killing and eating humans so they're a bit dull really.
We have apex predators already! Badgers.
Shooting them works really well.
Unfortunately its an expensive hobby. So not really enough people shooting deer as a hobby. Wolves will just need to eat one dead hiker or climber and will be wiped out again.
That's interesting - I always assumed they were common everywhere. There's nothing better than the heady smell of tomato plants in a hot greenhouse - that's why I buy vine tomatoes so I can sniff the stalks.As an aside, I was surprised to hear that backyard greenhouses exist in the UK. Here's they're expensive items only the rich can afford.
That's interesting - I always assumed they were common everywhere. There's nothing better than the heady smell of tomato plants in a hot greenhouse - that's why I buy vine tomatoes so I can sniff the stalks.
One neighbour in the 70s had one, whereas we had the back garden turned over into growing veg. Us kids had a row we had to look after - I was far more interested in watching the caterpillars destroy the crops though so not many plants survived.
Foxes. Raptors.
Neither Foxes nor Raptors will kill deer or goats more than a week or so after being born.
Small greenhouses are common here. The kind maybe two people could stand in at a time.That may be a condition of where you live. Poor people hunt in the US for meat all the time. It still costs money, but it comes out much cheaper than the supermarket. Even those costs can be limited by processing the deer yourself.
As an aside, I was surprised to hear that backyard greenhouses exist in the UK. Here they're expensive items only the rich can afford.
Pet dogs kill way more people than wolves ever have done.People who oppose wolf reintroduction claim this, but before wolves were removed from the environment in the US, there was only one death from wolf attack noted in 100 years. This was traced back to a starving pack who didn't have any other food. Bears kill many more people than wolves, and falls kill more people than bears.
Monbiot has taken aim at agriculture. His solution, inasmuch as he has elaborated on one, is to use high tech to intensively farm a smaller area. There are other interesting ideas that involve farming more extensively in ways that promote biodiversity. Monocultures are the real crime here.I agree that one of the main things humanity needs to learn is that The Environment isn’t something over there, while Humanity is something over here.
We are part of the environment: at the atomic level, we are carbon and water and minerals made from elements forged in ancient stars. At the individual level, we breathe the oxygen, eat the organic matter, live on the soil of the planet, and eventually return to it. At the species level, we roam and herd over the planet’s surface, using its resources, while shaping and being shaped by its processes. We are the environment, and the environment is us.
Small greenhouses are common here. The kind maybe two people could stand in at a time.
The standard UK ones are much smaller than you'd use for commercial scale growing. You can get a brand new 4x6 foot one for about £400 or under £300 ($380 US) if you get polycarbonate instead of glass, and second hand ones quite often come up on eBay or freecycle if you're prepared to dismantle, transport and rebuild it yourself. You can get smaller lean-to style growhouses for even less money too.I've only known two people with greenhouses. One was the wealthy wife of a local doctor who was teaching me knitting. She also had a pond and large grounds and outdoor kitchen. Her house and its amenities are now part of my plans for a dreamhouse (unlikely to be fullfilled).
The other is a rural neighbor who tried running a commercial tomato growing greenhouse. He failed after a couple of years, and it still sits there empty.