vimto said:"I thought you had given up on U75 Jessie
Second thoughts perhaps
Woof "
Jessiedog said:Just the death throes vim.
Fading fast.
Not much time left for me now (in urban and in life).
Can't decide whether a whimper or a bite.........
....Anyway, thanks for noticing.
Most won't.
Woof
The language spoken in Glasgow is Scots, the language in which Rabbie Burns mostly wrote. You can read some Scots here. Enjoy!Thomas77 said:... what exectly is gutteral Glaswegian?
Jessiedog said:Ten years it's been since the handover and all we see each year is democracy slipping further and further away into the distant future - the communist party in Hong Kong (the DABPHK) are now suggesting we won't be "ready" until at least 2022 or 2027.
Tomorrow?phildwyer said:Who do you thınk would wın a democratıc electıon ın Hong Kong?
Indeed.(BTW, I never accepted your gracıous apology or offered my own, allow me to do both now).
Jessiedog said:The democracy march on 18th March was small - about 6,000 souls.
Nevertheless, we walked proudly.
with 2007/2008 ruled out by a NPCSC interpretation of the Basic Law, 2012 is now the earliest date for any kind of democratic reform.
Those with the power are trying to push things back past 2017 and even beyond 2022.
Let's see.
Woof
There was not.Deareg said:was their ever democracy in hong kong? i was under the impression that the locals never had the vote under british rule
There is no strong workers movement in Hong Kong. No minimum wage. No maximum working hours. No collective bargaining. We still have elderly men and women cleaning toilets 12 hours a day six days a week with 7 days annual holiday, who earn a monthly salary of under GBP 200:00.phildwyer said:Hmmm. Is there no worker's movement ın Hong Kong then? I belıeve there used to be a very radıcal one under the Brıts?
The height of the violence
On July 8, hundreds of armed militia from the PRC fired at the Hong Kong Police at Sha Tau Kok.[citation needed] Five policemen were killed in the brief exchange of fire. The People's Daily in Beijing ran editorials supporting the leftist struggle in Hong Kong and rumours that the PRC was preparing to take over control of the colony began to circulate. The leftists tried in vain to organise a general strike, and attempts to persuade the Chinese serving in the police to join the pro-communist movement were equally unsuccessful. Rioters increasingly resorted to terrorist tactics, including bombings. Laboratories in some leftist schools were turned into bomb making workshops.[citation needed]
In response the police fought back and raided leftists strongholds. In one of the raids, helicopters from HMS Hermes a Royal Navy carrier were called in to land police on the roof of a 20-plus-storey building. Upon entering the building the police discovered bombs and weapons as well as a leftist hospital complete with dispensary and an operating theatre.[citation needed]
The Hong Kong Government imposed emergency regulations, granting the police special powers in attempt to quell the unrest. Leftists newspapers were banned from publishing; leftist schools were shut down; many leftists leaders were arrested, detained, and some of were later deported to the PRC.
The leftists retaliated by planting more bombs. Real bombs, mixed with even more decoys, were planted throughout the city. Normal life was severely disrupted and casualties began to rise. A seven-year-old girl and her two-year-old brother were killed by a bomb wrapped like a gift placed outside their residence. They were innocent victims in the madness of the cultural revolution. The family, like many others, eventually resettled in America to escape the misery. Bomb disposal experts from the police and the British military defused as many as 8,000 home-made bombs. Statistics rated 1 in every 8 bombs was genuine.[2]
The public outcry against the violence was widely reported in the media, and the leftists again switched tactics. On August 24, Lam Bun, a popular anti-leftist radio commentator, was murdered as he drove to work by a death squad posing as road maintenance workers. Other prominent figures of the media who had voiced opposition against the riots were also threatened including Louis Cha, then chairman of the Ming Pao News, who left Hong Kong for almost a year before returning.
The Aftermath
The waves of bombings did not subside until October of 1967. In December, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai ordered the leftist groups in Hong Kong to stop all bombings and the riots in Hong Kong finally came to an end. The disputes in total lasted 18 months[3].
By the time the riots subsided at the end of the year, 51 people, including 11 police officers, a British Army explosives disposal expert, and a firefighter were killed in the riots. In addition, more than 800 people sustained injuries, including 200 law enforcement personnel. 5000 people were arrested, including millions of dollars in property damage many times greater than the 1956 riot measured in USD[3]. Confidence in the colony's future declined among some of Hong Kong's populace, and many residents sold their property and relocated overseas.
Many leftist groups with close ties to the PRC were destroyed during the riots of 1967. Public support for the pro-communist leftists sank to an all-time low as the public widely condemned their violent behavior. The death of Lam Bun in particular outraged many Hong Kong residents. An attitude of mistrust and suspicion for pro-communists and the PRC has been retained by many people in Hong Kong.
The Hong Kong Police Force was applauded for its behaviour during the riots by the British Government. In 1969, Queen Elizabeth granted the Police Force the privilege of the Royal title. This title was to remain in use until the transfer of Hong Kong's sovereignty to the PRC in 1997.
The legacy of the 1967 Hong Kong riots extends even to the Chinese lexicon; in Cantonese, a home-made bomb is often referred to as a Boh Loh (lit. Pineapple).
This riot resulted in laws that prohibit fireworks without obtaining permission from the government.
Jessiedog said:There was not.
The Brits fucked over the HK peeps as far as democracy is concerned.
As late as 1987/88, both Westminster and the HK administration were arrogant enough to think that there would be no real demand for democracy in HK, despite he ongoing negotiations with Beijing regarding the handover.
Beijing was insisting on no further democratic development before the handover, but the UK was concerned that this would make it look bad. The HK govt. managed to convince Beijing to let them survey the HK population regarding democracy - assuring the Central govt. that the results would show that there was no need to progress with democratic reform.
The results of the 1988 survey showed clearly that there was a srtong demand for greater democracy in HK and that universal suffrage was what the peeps wanted. The HK and UK governments were in a real fix - caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.
So they did what any good government (ha ha) would do. They gerimandered the survey results (yes, they fiddled the results, they out and out lied about them,) to show that there was not a strong desire for democracy in the community.
Beijing was happy, the UK took a great sigh of relief and the HK peeps, as ever, got completely fucked over.
Britain's proposed "honourable withdrawal from HK", was implemented with about the same level of integrity as NuLabours "ethical foreign policy".
Woof
Jessiedog said:Right then!
*puts marching boots on*
Ten years since the handover and still no democracy?
I'm hitting the streets today with my "Democracy Now" banner.
The march starts at Victoria Park in Causeway Bay at 2:30pm, finshes at the goverment offices in Central at 6:30pm.
"We want democracy!"
Woof