Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hong Kong: China's Last Words?

Just stoppin by to wish Jessie and all our HK friends a wonderful Chinese New Year.
Kung Hay Fat Choy, Gong Xi Gong Xi and a grand ole







WOOF!






Happy Year of the Puppy, peeps! :)
 
Holy fucking cow and bejeezus!!!

:eek:


I was just rereading this thread and noticed that I posted this, (below,) on the 8th July 2004.

It was in response to a post by vim, as follows (he was commenting about me posting on this thread shortly after I had, nearly, flounced on another thread started by hipipol, my angst, perhaps, due to missing hipipol's irony - I was obviously extremely vunerable at the time).

:(

*shivers and turns cold*


In August 2004, less than a month later, I was lucky to survive a serious, VERY serious, suicide attempt - by sheer fluke; luck. By rights, I should not be here today.





vimto said:
"I thought you had given up on U75 Jessie

Second thoughts perhaps

Woof :D "

And my response...........



Jessiedog said:
Just the death throes vim.

Fading fast.

Not much time left for me now (in urban and in life).

Can't decide whether a whimper or a bite.........

....Anyway, thanks for noticing.

Most won't.

Woof

Interestingly, whenever I post, I almost always have a smilie of some kind or other before my final "Woof", unless I am being particularly sombre. I was obviously being particularly sombre in that post - there was no smilie.


Life still hurts today, but I'm very, VERY glad I'm still here.

Thank you everyone on Urban for sharing this journey with me. It is a blessing. You are all a blessing to me.

Bless you.

Blessings.

Etc.

:)

:oops:

Woof
 
Here we are again.

Another year.

17 long years.

Never forget 4th June 1989.

:(


medium_candle_logo.gif


Woof
 
4 June 1989 Beijing - 4 June 2006 Hong Kong

We will never forget.

capt.xvy10406041303.hong_kong_tiananmen_vigil_xvy104.jpg


http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg....jpg?x=380&y=241&sig=FNW4BoEc5WdWwqj.oJI3sg--

http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060604/i/r3984912235.jpg

http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20060604/i/r3030169531.jpg

Thousands of protesters take part in a candlelight vigil to
mark the 17th anniversary of the military crackdown on pro-democracy
movement in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 1989, at Hong Kong's Victoria Park, June 4 2006


Thank you Hong Kong -- and Jessie :thumbs: in particular.

As the infamous Bus Uncle said, "unresolved. Unresolved."

:(

.
 
My sister's going to be passing through HK on her journeys early next year... just read this entire thread (had a couple of years catching up to do since I last lurked at u75!!)... good luck, HK, I hope you and the mainland achieve democracy sooner rather than later.
 
Right then.

It's that time of year again.

1st of July.

I'm off to the democracy march.


*puts boots on*


Ah bugger! It's just started pissing down a tropical rainstorm.

Oh well......


"You coming then, Anson?"


Chan1.jpg


Anson Chan Fang On-sang. The conscience of Hong Kong.



:)

Woof
 
keep it going

woke up 2:30am and discovered this thread. didn't realize there're some hk peers here (including me :) though i'm thousands of miles away).
keep it up Jessie!
 
45 minutes to the end of another year;

a year of Bus Uncle and Ching Cheong, and

of poisoned fish, medals at the Asian Games and

the elimination of my

chiildhood icon
...

Counting down and a long goodbye to 2006 ... 12, 11, 10, 9, 8 ...

to Jessiedog and all readers of this thread:

Blessings for a healthy and happy 2007 :)
 
Thomas77 said:
... what exectly is gutteral Glaswegian?
The language spoken in Glasgow is Scots, the language in which Rabbie Burns mostly wrote. You can read some Scots here. Enjoy!

Scots is not a form of English, although the languages are closely related. You can think of them as sister languages, much like the relationship betwen the various Turkic languages; for example, as spoken in Turkey, and as spoken in Azerbaijan.
 
The democracy march on 18th March was small - about 6,000 souls.

Nevertheless, we walked proudly.

with 2007/2008 ruled out by a NPCSC interpretation of the Basic Law, 2012 is now the earliest date for any kind of democratic reform.

Those with the power are trying to push things back past 2017 and even beyond 2022.

Let's see.

Woof
 
Hi Meadow.

Good to see you!

I'll be popping along to Victoria Park tomorrow evening after work to light a candle.

I'll put up a post about it in the next couple of days.

Never forget!

:)

Woof
 
Well.

As usual it was a solemn and sombre event.

About 40,000 - 45,000 candles were raised.

The temperature was over 30C during the evening - it was tooooooo hot.

But at least we weren't battered by a tropical rainstorm this year.

Some of the "Mothers of Tiananmen" (a group of about 300 mothers who lost their children at Tiananmen,) were on video giving a speech and the names of all those who are known to have been killed were read out - from the youngest to the oldest (so many were in their teens and 20's).

:( :( :(


Here's looking forward to the democracy march on the 1st of July.

Ten years it's been since the handover and all we see each year is democracy slipping further and further away into the distant future - the communist party in Hong Kong (the DABPHK) are now suggesting we won't be "ready" until at least 2022 or 2027.

Fuck 'em!

:mad:

Woof
 
Jessiedog said:
Ten years it's been since the handover and all we see each year is democracy slipping further and further away into the distant future - the communist party in Hong Kong (the DABPHK) are now suggesting we won't be "ready" until at least 2022 or 2027.

Who do you thınk would wın a democratıc electıon ın Hong Kong?

(BTW, I never accepted your gracıous apology or offered my own, allow me to do both now).
 
phildwyer said:
Who do you thınk would wın a democratıc electıon ın Hong Kong?
Tomorrow?

S'an interesting question.

The irony is that, for the Chief Executive, an open and free election by universal suffrage, that anyone could stand in, would likely return the incumbent (Donald Tsang Yam-kuen,) who was Beijing's annointed candidate in the first place.

A career civil-service bod, with 38 years under his belt, Tsang rose to the position of Financial Secretary under Chris Patten in the last few years of British rule. Initially not trusted by the Chinese (for obvious reasons,) he is an able administrator and was eventually promoted to Chief Secretary of the Administration under Tung Chee Hwa's (the first Chief Executive) leadership, after incumbent Anson Chan Fang On-san (The conscience of Hong Kong,) was uncerimoniously "retired early" due to her general support for an early move towards democratic reform in HK.


(EDIT: I forgot to mention that Tsang was annointed Sir Donald in the mid 1990's for his "services-to-the-realm". A fact now convenienly ignored by both him and Beijing and pretty much everyone else, for sake of expedience.)


After the mass protests in 2003, Tung was dumped by Beijing in 2005 and Tsang was given a 2 year chance (the remainder of Tung's term,) to prove himself - as he apparently has done, since he was re-installed in March this year for 5 years.

With the economy now rocking-on again, wages rising and the feel-good factor buzzing across the (Special Administrative) Region like it hasn't since 1996/7, successive opinion polls show Tsang would likely garner 55% to 60% of any vote.

Despite this, many feel that he is too close to Beijing and it's only really the lack of an alternative, experienced politician/administrator (that would better represent HK peoples' interests and aspirations,) to vote for, that would stop them abandoning Tsang in droves.



With respect to the Legislative Council (LegCo), were all 60 seats returned by fairly-deliniated geographical constituences, I reckon the pan-democrats would garner about 40 - 45 seats, the pan-commies about 10 - 15 and the Pro-Beijing, large-corporates brigade maybe a couple or three - with independents taking a few if there were any remaining.

That would create a good balance, IMO, placing a strong check on the Executive through a strong democratic-camp influence in LegCo.

:)



(BTW, I never accepted your gracıous apology or offered my own, allow me to do both now).
Indeed.

Thank you.

Though, whereas I did fall into asking you to "fuck off", once, when you had regressed into a particularly horrid diatribe towards another poster, your own nasty and slanderous invective towards me was neither warranted, nor accurate.

So there.

:p

;)

Woof
 
Hmmm. Is there no worker's movement ın Hong Kong then? I belıeve there used to be a very radıcal one under the Brıts?

Not to drag out the past, but I'd always lıked you and thought we'd got along, so my admıttedly OTT reactıon to your unprovoked attack was prompted by the stıng of betrayal. But water, brıdge, all that...
 
Jessiedog said:
The democracy march on 18th March was small - about 6,000 souls.

Nevertheless, we walked proudly.

with 2007/2008 ruled out by a NPCSC interpretation of the Basic Law, 2012 is now the earliest date for any kind of democratic reform.

Those with the power are trying to push things back past 2017 and even beyond 2022.

Let's see.

Woof

was their ever democracy in hong kong? i was under the impression that the locals never had the vote under british rule
 
Deareg said:
was their ever democracy in hong kong? i was under the impression that the locals never had the vote under british rule
There was not.

The Brits fucked over the HK peeps as far as democracy is concerned.

As late as 1987/88, both Westminster and the HK administration were arrogant enough to think that there would be no real demand for democracy in HK, despite he ongoing negotiations with Beijing regarding the handover.

Beijing was insisting on no further democratic development before the handover, but the UK was concerned that this would make it look bad. The HK govt. managed to convince Beijing to let them survey the HK population regarding democracy - assuring the Central govt. that the results would show that there was no need to progress with democratic reform.

The results of the 1988 survey showed clearly that there was a srtong demand for greater democracy in HK and that universal suffrage was what the peeps wanted. The HK and UK governments were in a real fix - caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.

So they did what any good government (ha ha) would do. They gerimandered the survey results (yes, they fiddled the results, they out and out lied about them,) to show that there was not a strong desire for democracy in the community.

Beijing was happy, the UK took a great sigh of relief and the HK peeps, as ever, got completely fucked over.

Britain's proposed "honourable withdrawal from HK", was implemented with about the same level of integrity as NuLabours "ethical foreign policy".

:mad:

Woof
 
phildwyer said:
Hmmm. Is there no worker's movement ın Hong Kong then? I belıeve there used to be a very radıcal one under the Brıts?
There is no strong workers movement in Hong Kong. No minimum wage. No maximum working hours. No collective bargaining. We still have elderly men and women cleaning toilets 12 hours a day six days a week with 7 days annual holiday, who earn a monthly salary of under GBP 200:00.

:(

The only "workers movement" in HK while under British administration, was encapsulated in the 1967 riots. Triggered by a doubling of the fare of the Star Ferry (the only route across from HK - Kowloon and back,) from five cents to 10c and ostensibly championing the rights of the poor, the reality of the situation (months of demonstrations, riots and home made bombs which killed over 50 people,) was that it was a spillage of the Cultural Revolution from the mainland over into HK.

At that time, the territory was rife with rumours that the CCP was about to try and take over the territory by allowing the Red Guards and others to flood into the territory, causing chaos.

Some in HK did support the commies and their methods, but most were solidly behind the British administration as it struggled to maintain order (and even control) of the territory.



The height of the violence

On July 8, hundreds of armed militia from the PRC fired at the Hong Kong Police at Sha Tau Kok.[citation needed] Five policemen were killed in the brief exchange of fire. The People's Daily in Beijing ran editorials supporting the leftist struggle in Hong Kong and rumours that the PRC was preparing to take over control of the colony began to circulate. The leftists tried in vain to organise a general strike, and attempts to persuade the Chinese serving in the police to join the pro-communist movement were equally unsuccessful. Rioters increasingly resorted to terrorist tactics, including bombings. Laboratories in some leftist schools were turned into bomb making workshops.[citation needed]

In response the police fought back and raided leftists strongholds. In one of the raids, helicopters from HMS Hermes a Royal Navy carrier were called in to land police on the roof of a 20-plus-storey building. Upon entering the building the police discovered bombs and weapons as well as a leftist hospital complete with dispensary and an operating theatre.[citation needed]

The Hong Kong Government imposed emergency regulations, granting the police special powers in attempt to quell the unrest. Leftists newspapers were banned from publishing; leftist schools were shut down; many leftists leaders were arrested, detained, and some of were later deported to the PRC.

The leftists retaliated by planting more bombs. Real bombs, mixed with even more decoys, were planted throughout the city. Normal life was severely disrupted and casualties began to rise. A seven-year-old girl and her two-year-old brother were killed by a bomb wrapped like a gift placed outside their residence. They were innocent victims in the madness of the cultural revolution. The family, like many others, eventually resettled in America to escape the misery. Bomb disposal experts from the police and the British military defused as many as 8,000 home-made bombs. Statistics rated 1 in every 8 bombs was genuine.[2]

The public outcry against the violence was widely reported in the media, and the leftists again switched tactics. On August 24, Lam Bun, a popular anti-leftist radio commentator, was murdered as he drove to work by a death squad posing as road maintenance workers. Other prominent figures of the media who had voiced opposition against the riots were also threatened including Louis Cha, then chairman of the Ming Pao News, who left Hong Kong for almost a year before returning.



The Aftermath

The waves of bombings did not subside until October of 1967. In December, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai ordered the leftist groups in Hong Kong to stop all bombings and the riots in Hong Kong finally came to an end. The disputes in total lasted 18 months[3].

By the time the riots subsided at the end of the year, 51 people, including 11 police officers, a British Army explosives disposal expert, and a firefighter were killed in the riots. In addition, more than 800 people sustained injuries, including 200 law enforcement personnel. 5000 people were arrested, including millions of dollars in property damage many times greater than the 1956 riot measured in USD[3]. Confidence in the colony's future declined among some of Hong Kong's populace, and many residents sold their property and relocated overseas.

Many leftist groups with close ties to the PRC were destroyed during the riots of 1967. Public support for the pro-communist leftists sank to an all-time low as the public widely condemned their violent behavior. The death of Lam Bun in particular outraged many Hong Kong residents. An attitude of mistrust and suspicion for pro-communists and the PRC has been retained by many people in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong Police Force was applauded for its behaviour during the riots by the British Government. In 1969, Queen Elizabeth granted the Police Force the privilege of the Royal title. This title was to remain in use until the transfer of Hong Kong's sovereignty to the PRC in 1997.

The legacy of the 1967 Hong Kong riots extends even to the Chinese lexicon; in Cantonese, a home-made bomb is often referred to as a Boh Loh (lit. Pineapple).

This riot resulted in laws that prohibit fireworks without obtaining permission from the government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_1967_riots



:)

Woof
 
Jessiedog said:
There was not.

The Brits fucked over the HK peeps as far as democracy is concerned.

As late as 1987/88, both Westminster and the HK administration were arrogant enough to think that there would be no real demand for democracy in HK, despite he ongoing negotiations with Beijing regarding the handover.

Beijing was insisting on no further democratic development before the handover, but the UK was concerned that this would make it look bad. The HK govt. managed to convince Beijing to let them survey the HK population regarding democracy - assuring the Central govt. that the results would show that there was no need to progress with democratic reform.

The results of the 1988 survey showed clearly that there was a srtong demand for greater democracy in HK and that universal suffrage was what the peeps wanted. The HK and UK governments were in a real fix - caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.

So they did what any good government (ha ha) would do. They gerimandered the survey results (yes, they fiddled the results, they out and out lied about them,) to show that there was not a strong desire for democracy in the community.

Beijing was happy, the UK took a great sigh of relief and the HK peeps, as ever, got completely fucked over.

Britain's proposed "honourable withdrawal from HK", was implemented with about the same level of integrity as NuLabours "ethical foreign policy".

:mad:

Woof

you lot have been fucked from all sides, hope things work out for you
 
Right then!

*puts marching boots on*

Ten years since the handover and still no democracy?

I'm hitting the streets today with my "Democracy Now" banner.

The march starts at Victoria Park in Causeway Bay at 2:30pm, finshes at the goverment offices in Central at 6:30pm.



"We want democracy!"



*Does bootlaces up really tight*


Back later peeps.


:)


Woof

Woof
 
Jessiedog said:
Right then!

*puts marching boots on*

Ten years since the handover and still no democracy?

I'm hitting the streets today with my "Democracy Now" banner.

The march starts at Victoria Park in Causeway Bay at 2:30pm, finshes at the goverment offices in Central at 6:30pm.


"We want democracy!"


Woof

Sorry I coudn't make it over myself. I will be interested to hear about the numbers and opposition. All I have been exposed to so far is the rather overdone nationalistic extravagance for the 10 year anniversary of Hong Kong's return to China. Hu Jintao has been very high profile during the celebrations and the opening of the new bridge to Shenzhen.
 
Back
Top Bottom