Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Herne Hill news, chitter chatter and gossip

Up to a point. The criticism I have of sections of the voluntary sector is that not all are what I would call volunteers.

I know someone ( unemployed) whose worked "voluntarily" in various charity shops or get his benefits sanctioned. This includes Oxfam.

Shop managers are often paid workers.

There is grey area in charity sector of who really qualifies as "voluntary" worker.

They also don’t pay business rates.
 
If a business wants to become an accredited Living Wage employer they will ask about for example use of zero hours contracts.




FAQs | Living Wage Foundation

Its a difficult balancing act. The Living Wage Foundation is a NGO that's been successful campaigning group.

How far should they go in adding additional rights to workers?

Keeping it straight forward to a Living Wage for employees money per hour is right tactic imo.

Its not something that can be easily disputed. Its rational estimate of what an hours wages should be to live a life not just survive. To be able to participate in society not spend all ones time worrying about how to pay basic bills.

Even then I've seen it disputed here. Ie t the Living Wage Foundation must have a political agenda or that people should talk to employers however "distasteful" that is.

Living Wage Foundation simple straightforward message that hourly pay should be set at rationally set amount shows what right wing bollox any criticism of it is. Right wing bollix masquerading as man of the world fairness.

I'm not sure if you are saying that my pointing out that it doesn't necessarily capture how good an employer is, amounts to "right wing bollox".

I'm not criticising what the Living Wage Foundation does; I'm saying there's limitations to what the accreditation can tell you. Yes it's good to set a figure on some kind of rational basis that is higher than the minimum wage, and it's good to give companies an incentive to pay that.

I see that Lidl isn't accredited by the way. Why's that - is it because of other employment policies they apply? The knowledge that they pay the living wage influences your decision to shop with them, but is it at the expense of other aspects of their employees' employment deals?

Earlier today I was looking at a website where employees rate their employers. Tesco for example gets a better rating than Lidl.

Lidl Reviews | Glassdoor.co.uk

I don't know really if these ratings are representative. But it's always a problem if you pick out one aspect of something; focus on that can distract from other questions. I'm sure the Living Wage Foundation are very aware of this and do what they can to mitigate it. Doesn't mean it's not a problem though.
 
Full on Morris Dancing action around Herne Hill tonight!

brixton-tatterjacks-01.jpg


Tonight! Brixton Tatterjacks Morris dancers on the loose in Herne Hill from 7.30pm, Thurs 5th July
 
I'm not sure if you are saying that my pointing out that it doesn't necessarily capture how good an employer is, amounts to "right wing bollox".

I'm not criticising what the Living Wage Foundation does; I'm saying there's limitations to what the accreditation can tell you. Yes it's good to set a figure on some kind of rational basis that is higher than the minimum wage, and it's good to give companies an incentive to pay that.

I see that Lidl isn't accredited by the way. Why's that - is it because of other employment policies they apply? The knowledge that they pay the living wage influences your decision to shop with them, but is it at the expense of other aspects of their employees' employment deals?

Earlier today I was looking at a website where employees rate their employers. Tesco for example gets a better rating than Lidl.

Lidl Reviews | Glassdoor.co.uk

I don't know really if these ratings are representative. But it's always a problem if you pick out one aspect of something; focus on that can distract from other questions. I'm sure the Living Wage Foundation are very aware of this and do what they can to mitigate it. Doesn't mean it's not a problem though.

Im not at all clear what you want me to support.

I often get the impression I get seen here as some kind of out of touch leftie ( not how I see myself) . So I support Living Wage Foundation moderate demands and now I'm not at radical enough.

See your banned so will leave it at this.
 
Im not at all clear what you want me to support.

I often get the impression I get seen here as some kind of out of touch leftie ( not how I see myself) . So I support Living Wage Foundation moderate demands and now I'm not at radical enough.

See your banned so will leave it at this.

I don't see you as an out of touch leftie....
 
Most of this LLW debate, interesting as it, is isn't about Herne Hill.

I have shopped local in Herne Hill and Brixton whenever I can. Yes I shop in Lidl, but I also shop in Sainsburys just because its nearby. I purposely avoid shopping with Amazon and I dislike shopping on line in general.

For years - even when I've had very little money, I made sure I did my best to support local small shops and businesses. There were more empty shops than not in Herne Hill when I first moved here and it was quiet, dull and bleak, with very sense of community or stuff going on. Now all the units are full, there's a market, there's a film festival and life on the street. I've never been able to drive and I value having places near by where I can shop easily, where I might see people I know and bump into my neighbours, it helps me feel at home here.

and I'm looking forward to some quality ice cream soon.
 
On Lidl. Appears they are paying Living Wage. According to Living Wage Foundation website. It does appear they haven't gone through the whole accreditation process.

Lidl to become first supermarket to pay Living Wage | Living Wage Foundation

Interesting YouGov article on how there reputation has gone up. So paying Living Wage can do company good.

YouGov | Lidl’s pay increase should play well with consumers

Not being "accredited" is an issue. Looks like Lidl didn't go through whole process.
 
The LLW page has a whole heap of business economic arguments for paying LLW or the regional equivalent. Intentionally their campaign focus is on FTSE 250 companies and large employers like local authorities.

Despite the stupid tabloid oxfam bashing posted earlier, third sector orgs are over represented on the current accredited list here: Living Wage Employers by Region | Living Wage Foundation compared to smes or big corps / public bodies.

They don’t lobby cottage industries like the one which prompted this sudden interest in HH. When I last spoke to them (my employer pays LLW and I only take grant funding from people who do too), they were clear that start up businesses should aim for LLW but as a mid term goal, not a reason to not to start or employ anyone at all. That’s a more strategic, experienced campaigners approach based on what works to deliver system change over glib soundbites.

We shouldn’t confuse LLW accreditation as a wider sign of ethical business - there’s a whole bunch of LLW payers who I wouldn’t touch with a barge pole; from the likes of top 4 management consultancies (KPMG etc) to big pharma like GSK. They amongst other people I wouldn’t share a pint with sit on the LLW advisory board as I think I’ve said before.

So as usual, we’ve focussed on one small new cottage business and not asked why our loacal authority, the shops we frequent or the pubs promoted on this site don’t even meet the salary he’s offering.
 
I've started a Living Wage thread in politics if anyone is interested. Can we stop the debate here unless its Herne Hill related.
 
So as usual, we’ve focussed on one small new cottage business and not asked why our loacal authority, the shops we frequent or the pubs promoted on this site don’t even meet the salary he’s offering.

Lambeth does and it makes sure its contractors do as far as I know. The Brixton Rec is managed by GLL/ Better and it does in Lambeth. Including cleaners.

This is the "whataboutery" argument.
 
We shouldn’t confuse LLW accreditation as a wider sign of ethical business - there’s a whole bunch of LLW payers who I wouldn’t touch with a barge pole; from the likes of top 4 management consultancies (KPMG etc) to big pharma like GSK. They amongst other people I wouldn’t share a pint with sit on the LLW advisory board as I think I’ve said before. this

I never have.

What I say is that Living Wage is straightforward issue.

People work they should get living wage.

That's not glib.

Its not about being ethical. Its about real life.

It might be ok for you to go on about KMPG etc and complain. But back in the real world having LLW as ones hourly rate means a big deal.
 
Despite the stupid tabloid oxfam bashing posted earlier, third sector orgs are over represented on the current accredited list here: Living Wage Employers by Region | Living Wage Foundation compared to smes or big corps / public bodies.

.


Oxfam warned it could lose European funding over scandal

The potential threat to humanitarian funds came as Penny Lawrence, who was international programmes director when concerns about sexual misconduct were first reported, quit saying she was “ashamed” at what had happened.

She admitted that allegations about paying for sex relating to Roland van Hauwermeiren, the country director for Chad, and members of his team there had been raised internally before he moved to Haiti, but not handled properly.

"Stupid tabloid bashing" :facepalm:

So you don't think it's serious issue?
 
The LLW page has a whole heap of business economic arguments for paying LLW or the regional equivalent. Intentionally their campaign focus is on FTSE 250 companies and large employers like local authorities.

According to this report half accredited Living Wage business are SMEs

This report focuses on the Living Wage and its implementation by small and medium-sized
enterprises (SMEs) across the UK. Whilst the spotlight in recent years has largely been on
large Living Wage employers (corporations and public sector institutions), very little is
known about the operational and strategic decisions made about the Living Wage by SMEs.
This is despite the fact that SMEs make up over half of the 2,800 employers who have
signed up voluntarily to pay the Living Wage[/
QUOTE]
 

Attachments

  • University-of-Middlesex-Putting-the-Living-Wage-to-Work-October-2016.pdf
    1 MB · Views: 1
Lambeth does and it makes sure its contractors do as far as I know. The Brixton Rec is managed by GLL/ Better and it does in Lambeth. Including cleaners.

This is the "whataboutery" argument.
AFAIAC ‘the whataboutery’ is not an unreasonable or invalid line of discussion at all. The only possible reason in my view to mention that an incoming business does not pay the LLW is surely to highlight that fact as a negative, and suggest to prospective customers who read this forum that they could consider spending their money elsewhere. That’s not something I have a problem with btw.

But if in the same forum other businesses that also are said to fail to pay the LLW are given a free ride if not actually promoted on a regular basis, then questioning the consistency of such behaviour is more than perfectly valid, and by no means necessarily motivated by agendas, beef or anything suchlike.

I think most of us have so much of a good time in pubs, bars and clubs we are prepared to cut those who don’t pay the LLW far more slack than we would to other businesses. Therefore I don’t think it’s very fair to highlight the fact that a certain business like the ice cream guys moving into HH does not pay the LLW while others that are also guilty of it are constantly given a free ride here.

In fact, one could argue that chain pubs and bars that are part of big breweries/ companies that have far more capital and financial security than the likes of small ice cream companies should be the first target of any LLW campaigns, before small businesses could me too the spotlight .
 
Last edited:
AFAIAC ‘the whataboutery’ is not an unreasonable or invalid line of discussion at all. The only possible reason in my view to mention that an incoming business does not pay the LLW is surely to highlight that fact as a negative, and suggest to prospective customers who read this forum that they could consider spending their money elsewhere.

But if in the same forum other businesses that also are said to fail to pay the LLW are given a free ride if not actually promoted on a regular basis, then questioning the consistency of such behaviour is more than perfectly valid, and by no means necessarily motivated by agendas, beef or anything suchlike.

I think most of us have so much of a good time in pubs, bars and clubs we are prepared to cut those who don’t pay the LLW far more slack than we would to other businesses. Therefore I don’t think it’s very fair to highlight the fact that a certain business like the ice cream guys moving into HH does not pay the LLW while others that are also guilty of it are constantly given a free ride here.

In fact, one could argue that chain pubs and bars that are part of big breweries/ companies that have far more capital and financial security than the likes of small ice cream companies should be the first target of any LLW campaigns, before small businesses could me too the spotlight .

Ive covered this issue in post 2220.
 
Ever keen to achieve community improvement by leading people up the garen path - and taking several years to do so, how about this:

1. Battle of the Parks - Cllr Gym Dickson apparently promised £50,000 to both Ruskin Park and Milkwood Park from the same section 106 contribution. Promises like this to two partners led to breach of promise actions in Victorian times Friends of Ruskin Park criticise Lambeth Council after expected £51,000 in funding goes to nearby park

2. Lambeth have at long last launched a consultation on providing an Outdoor Gym in Milkwood Park Survey Login

In a way I am happy. Gym Dickson has nicked an idea me and Mrs Magpie had to rejuvenate the tired old Car Wash outside the barrier block.

By the looks of it the council have managed to find a "partner" keen to provide non-traditional and more expensive exercise equipment for Milkwood Park. Hope pensioners or young people will still be able to use it like they do on Southwark's more traditional equipment in Burgess Park and Peckham Rye.

Meanwhile Coldharbour Councillor Emma Nye can rest at ease - the Coldharbour Car Wash (of which Lambeth Council owns the freehold) will still be available for a luxury private redevelopment when she returns to work after her 6 month maternity leave.
 
Meanwhile Coldharbour Councillor Emma Nye can rest at ease - the Coldharbour Car Wash (of which Lambeth Council owns the freehold) will still be available for a luxury private redevelopment when she returns to work after her 6 month maternity leave.
I'm dreading the plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
Ever keen to achieve community improvement by leading people up the garen path - and taking several years to do so, how about this:

1. Battle of the Parks - Cllr Gym Dickson apparently promised £50,000 to both Ruskin Park and Milkwood Park from the same section 106 contribution. Promises like this to two partners led to breach of promise actions in Victorian times Friends of Ruskin Park criticise Lambeth Council after expected £51,000 in funding goes to nearby park

2. Lambeth have at long last launched a consultation on providing an Outdoor Gym in Milkwood Park Survey Login

In a way I am happy. Gym Dickson has nicked an idea me and Mrs Magpie had to rejuvenate the tired old Car Wash outside the barrier block.

By the looks of it the council have managed to find a "partner" keen to provide non-traditional and more expensive exercise equipment for Milkwood Park. Hope pensioners or young people will still be able to use it like they do on Southwark's more traditional equipment in Burgess Park and Peckham Rye.

Meanwhile Coldharbour Councillor Emma Nye can rest at ease - the Coldharbour Car Wash (of which Lambeth Council owns the freehold) will still be available for a luxury private redevelopment when she returns to work after her 6 month maternity leave.

Why are you retelling a story from 2015? Quiet news day?
 
Why are you retelling a story from 2015? Quiet news day?
For some reason I got a consultation email from Lambeth about it.
Not that I live in Milkwood Road or even in Herne Hill Ward
Lambeth Consultations

On reflection I see this is part of a pot pourri including "Extension of the Public Spaces Protection Order for Novel Psychoactive Substances", "Have your say on: Lambeth's Sexual Health Pharmacy Service Redesign", "Have your say on: Waterloo Works! Pre-planning application consultation"

and the piece de resistance -
Consultation drop-in sessions
Do you need assistance when completing one of the council’s online consultations? Or don’t have access to a tablet, smartphone or computer, then feel free to come along to one of our drop-in sessions, where we can offer you help and the use of one of our devices.
Find out more about Consultation drop-in sessions
 
Last edited:
Has the new ice cream place opened yet - there was still an opening soon notice there when I last went past a couple of weeks ago?
 
Agile Rabbit opened last night and is offering 50% off food for the first week. They’re also doing live music, mostly jazz.
Is it a bar or or a restraunt? what sort of clientele go there?

Is it just me or does Agile Rabbit seem like a weird name?
 
Back
Top Bottom