Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Harry Roberts has been freed

If he's got any sense he'll show some remorse and apologise to the families when he gets out. It wouldn't be much fun trying to live a strange new life at the age of 78 with the whole world hating your guts.
 
You have been on here a long time, just cast your mind back to many of my posts.

I've been here for 14 years. My profile information is wrong for some reason.

I joined U75 in May 2000 as a troll to take the piss out of those "kettled" at Oxford Circus, but then got sucked off in by people like you!
 
Who was that being interviewed on Radio around 6pm. He sounded like an idiot. Said rehabilitation didn't work and Harry had done it before and likely to do it again.
The guy on PM? He was a serving copper. God knows where they dug him up from but he couldn't even make his argument well.
 
worse than noye?

Probably not:

_67490240_165110124.jpg
 
Last edited:
The guy on PM? He was a serving copper. God knows where they dug him up from but he couldn't even make his argument well.
That's the one. I thought they said he was a police officer at the end but then I thought he couldn't have been. He sounded really thick! I couldn't understand why they let him keep talking :confused:
 
I've been here for 14 years. My profile information is wrong for some reason.

I joined U75 in May 2000 as a troll to take the piss out of those "kettled" at Oxford Circus, but then got sucked off in by people like you!

Started as a winner. Continued that way.
 
Who was that being interviewed on Radio around 6pm. He sounded like an idiot. Said rehabilitation didn't work and Harry had done it before and likely to do it again.

"Done it before therefore likely to do it again" is nearly always wrong for murder, it has pretty much the lowest recidivism rate of any crime, typically about 2% from memory. Although from other stuff in the thread, it does sound like Harry Roberts is more likely to be one of the 2% than your average killer.
 
"Done it before therefore likely to do it again" is nearly always wrong for murder, it has pretty much the lowest recidivism rate of any crime, typically about 2% from memory. Although from other stuff in the thread, it does sound like Harry Roberts is more likely to be one of the 2% than your average killer.
We are the 98 percent.
 
Alright, let's have a row.



Should we release every prisoner who cannot replicate his crime?

No prison for those who are unlikely to re-offend?

Is that your position Louis MacNeice ?

I'd also be interested in the views of ViolentPanda and Bakunin

I doubt many people have a problem with whole-life sentences for some criminals. In some cases I don't, either. I don't see the likes of Dennis Nilsen or Peter Sutcliffe as being good prospects for ever being released. But I do see whole-life sentences as something that should be reserved for those who pose the most lasting danger to society. Roberts killed three people in cold blood and had a serious,m long-term list of previous convictions, granted, but he's also 80-odd years old and unlikely to ever pose a major threat. The problem for Roberts is similar to that faced by Ronnie Biggs and the Krays. He was held possibly longer than he might have been because of who he is as much as what he did. The Krays tried to build a criminal empire, Biggs made a career out of making the Establishment look stupid, Roberts murdered three representatives of the Establishment, police officers. If you kill a police officer then you're seen as striking against not three individuals but the forces of the State itself. 48 years might seem like a long sentence, but the average life sentence for murder is around sixteen years, so 48 for killing three police officers isn't really as much a surprise as you might at first think. When it comes to whole-life sentences, I'd far prefer to examine them on a case by case basis than have a blanket rule.
 
Can see why the Police Fed aren't keen on his release:-

“They keep asking me ‘Do you feel remorse, Harry?’ And I say no. We didn’t want to murder anyone. That was the last thing we wanted. We shot them because we thought they were going to nick us and we didn’t want to go to jail for 15 years. We were professional criminals. We don’t react the same way as ordinary people. The police aren’t like real people to us. They’re strangers, they’re the enemy. And you don’t feel remorse for killing a stranger. I do feel sorry for what we did to their families. I do. But it’s like people I killed in Malaya when I was in the army. You don’t feel remorse.”http://www.nickdavies.net/1993/02/01/meeting-the-man-who-kills-coppers/
 
Can see why the Police Fed aren't keen on his release:-

“They keep asking me ‘Do you feel remorse, Harry?’ And I say no. We didn’t want to murder anyone. That was the last thing we wanted. We shot them because we thought they were going to nick us and we didn’t want to go to jail for 15 years. We were professional criminals. We don’t react the same way as ordinary people. The police aren’t like real people to us. They’re strangers, they’re the enemy. And you don’t feel remorse for killing a stranger. I do feel sorry for what we did to their families. I do. But it’s like people I killed in Malaya when I was in the army. You don’t feel remorse.”http://www.nickdavies.net/1993/02/01/meeting-the-man-who-kills-coppers/
I linked to that on page 1.

Post #4.
 
Back
Top Bottom