where have i said anything about legislating against anything? why do people always assume that if you don't like a thing you want to be the fucking thought police?
I'd differentiate between the two, myself. The SCUM manifesto was funny, angry and made serious, politically radical points. This is just vile, and braindeadIt is the case that there are certain things that could be and were published in the past, such as the SCUM Manifesto, that would probably not be allowed today.
The comedic usage is of the serial killing. The rape is what makes you question what you've been laughing at for the past hour. imo.
Well, likewise, years since I saw it and no desire to see it again, but I thought the rape was used to make you stop up and feel uneasy about what had gone before - kind of illustrating the point being made here about rape.It's years since I saw it, and I have zero desire to see it. I'm not sure if they were using it in the way you suggest though. I think it may have been just another bit of exploitation for them. But your mileage may vary.
What if people are joking about killing Tories?
what's unclear or baffling about my post?
nah, hes a web design student.
(here is his website)
D'you think you could take that down gabi? He is a child. The silly little cunt is probably getting more than his share of grief already.
D'you think you could take that down gabi? He is a child. The silly little cunt is probably getting more than his share of grief already.
With any 'just a joke' defence you have to look at who is on the reciving end - if its groups of people without little or no power and/or whoa re systamatically shat on that defence is null and void because you are helping keep these people down.
Joking about getting away with rape is contributing to a widely held discourse which sees women as depersonalised sex objects whose only usefulness is as something to stick your dick into.
There is a huge problem with men who see rape as not that bad, and women 'wanting it really' and these utter cunts are tapping into that for a 'laugh'. And this problem is a serious one at universities.
Rape is massively under-reported and those that are reported are unlikely to result in a prosectuion.
Now 'tories' are targetted for 'lets kill the fuckers' jokes. But last time I looked they're was not a problem with murder of tories going unreported and/or failing to result in convictions or even happening very much at all (but we live in hope).
In addtion Tories are targetted for their political beliefs and tend to people who are very rich and powerful. And cunts.
Fair fucking game in other words.
If people really cant see the distinction or need this spelling out they really need to have a word with themselves.
The registered owner of the website is different. There's also a phone number.
[edit]
His name is on the BBC article. His phone number isn't, but it's not hard to find.
well, he's probably not living there atm if he's at plymouth uni.Is that the chap?
name & address.
Is that the chap?
Is that the chap?
That is the bloke who should be done, the site creator