not-bono-ever
meh
That's a whole thread in itself for the economics geeks on here.
Not even remotely accurate. You're not very good at this, are you?
To put it as simply as the English language will allow : I am saying that the prediction of an implosion of the global financial system, as predicted in the thread header, was just so much fear mongering bullshit.
It's actually crazy how much money they've pumped in the system
. The system is in even better state now as legislation has been promulgated and rules put in place to prevent this situation arising in the future.
You’ve jumped the shark , you foolThe reality is that, in the USA where of course the "global financial crisis" began, $90bil more has been paid back into the system than was paid out.
The thread header which talks of a "global implosion" is pure nonsense, as the system has corrected itself. The system is in even better state now as legislation has been promulgated and rules put in place to prevent this situation arising in the future.
Large corporations have been massive taxpayers for decades, so why shouldn't they get some government aid when they fall on "bad times" just as individual taxpayers get? As the "bailout score card" shows, they've paid back far more than they've received in aid.
https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/
You’ve jumped the shark , you fool
“There is no such thing as public money, only taxpayer money.” — Margaret Thatcher, 1983
Alarm sounds over state of UK high street as sales crashThe rapid rise in UK consumer debt to £200bn from car finance, personal loans and credit cards is unsustainable at current growth rates and should raise “red flags” for the major lenders, ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has warned.
In detailed analysis of the sector, S&P warned that losses from this form of lending suffered by banks and other financial institutions could be “sharp and very sudden” in an economic downturn and may be exacerbated if the Bank of England increased interest rates.
World's witnessing a new Gilded Age as billionaires’ wealth swells to $6tnHigh street sales are falling at their fastest rate since the height of the recession in 2009 as struggling households put the brakes on spending, according to a survey that is a grim omen for struggling retailers this Christmas.
The CBI’s closely watched survey recorded a “steep drop” in retail sales in October. The slump sent shockwaves through the high street, with the CBI’s chief economist, Rain Newton-Smith, warning of a “softening” of demand as inflation ate into Britons’ spending power. Department stores and specialist food and drink outlets bore the brunt of the spending slowdown.
The world’s super-rich hold the greatest concentration of wealth since the US Gilded Age at the turn of the 20th century, when families like the Carnegies, Rockefellers and Vanderbilts controlled vast fortunes.
Billionaires increased their combined global wealth by almost a fifth last year to a record $6tn (£4.5tn) – more than twice the GDP of the UK. There are now 1,542 dollar billionaires across the world, after 145 multi-millionaires saw their wealth tick over into nine-zero fortunes last year, according to the UBS / PwC Billionaires report.
My interest on my savings as I try to get enough to get on the housing ladder is literally on the order of pennies per year, this isn't going to help muchInterest Rates up to 0.5%
Subscribe to read
Just to keep us all up to date - bonds constructed of Student debt being additionally securitised and flogged- and much the issuance is less than Junk - they have the rating that is either missing because they are so utter shit or sub DPRK.
People are buying any old shit right now. It's "a rising tide lifts all boats". EU junk bonds were beating US treasuries for a while.Who the fuck is buying it?
The comeback in complex credit derivatives blamed for exacerbating the global financial crisis is picking up pace.
That’s according to new research this week from Citigroup Inc., one of the biggest arrangers of so-called synthetic collateralized debt obligations. Sales of the products may jump to as much as $100 billion this year from about $20 billion in 2015, Citigroup analysts wrote in an Oct. 31 report.
While investors suffered billions of dollars in losses on similar bets a decade ago, the leverage offered by synthetic CDOs is luring back buyers in an era of low yields and dwindling volatility.
All good then!“Even if you were the bullest of the bulls, this crazy rally start to the year took you off guard,” said Michael Antonelli, an institutional equity sales trader and managing director at Robert W. Baird & Co. “We’ve completely run out of ways to describe what’s happening. We get asked a lot, are you seeing anything different that could explain the rally? The answer is no.”
Carillion builds schools, roads, hospitals – and it’s meant to be a big part of HS2. What’s more, if it goes bust, the bill will be picked up by taxpayers.
You may never have heard of Carillion. There’s no reason you should have. Its lack of glamour is neatly summed up by the name it sported in the 90s: Tarmac. But since then it has grown and grown to become the UK’s second-largest building firm – and one of the biggest contractors to the British government. Name an infrastructure pie in the UK and the chances are Carillion has its fingers in it: the HS2 rail link, broadband rollout, the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, the Library of Birmingham. It maintains army barracks, builds PFI schools, lays down roads in Aberdeen. The lot.
There’s just one snag. For over a year now, Carillion has been in meltdown. Its shares have dropped 90%, it’s issued profit warnings, and it’s on to its third chief executive within six months. And this week, the government moved into emergency mode. A group of ministers held a crisis meeting on Thursday to discuss the firm. Around the table, reports the FT, were business secretary Greg Clark, as well as ministers from the Cabinet Office, health, transport, justice, education and local government. Even the Foreign Office sent a representative.
The global elites have rediscovered their animal spirits.
As the World Economic Forum drew to a close in the Swiss ski resort, the overarching mood of the executives, policy makers and investors was that their economies are in fine shape and that stock markets have every reason to extend their run.
"Let’s celebrate what could go right for the moment because we are in a sweet spot," International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde said on the closing panel discussion.
Sweet spot ffs. The rulers and their gilded bubble.Such sentiment led delegates to declare that it was the most upbeat Davos gathering since before the financial crisis. Yet the giddiness also gave some investors pause as they warned against turning too exuberant.
“I do feel it’s a little bit like 2006,” Barclays Plc Chief Executive Officer Jes Staley said earlier in the week.
It's not really Trumpism. The global powerhouse Central Banks The Fed, Bank of England, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Swiss National Bank etc have been buying anything they can lay there hands on. Started off as an emergency measure to stop the Global Recession 2009 but they didn't stop.right, i've been watching my 401K go up and up, with is nice, but the only thing behind it seems to be trumpism. i've been sort of following bloomberg this past year and so far as i can tell they cottoned onto this right away, no doubt hewing to the politics of their anti-trumpist owner, though that doesn't mean they're wrong. meanwhile people are being evicted like there's no tomorrow etc. and, the next article on that bloomberg page is "Biggest Stock Sell Signal Since 2013 Sparked by Record Inflows".
$21.7 trillion in assets as of December 2017! Even when they were neutral all monies made on what they owned were recycled into new purchases. At some point with a "return to normalisation" they'd theoretically want to sell their assets to the market. Is there a market for it? Who can buy that much? When is the credit cycle going to end?Put another way, “normalization” has been a much-vaunted word used by the members of the Fed, but nothing of the sort has occurred. We are being bamboozled. Perhaps it will occur at some point, but it has not happened yet. “Flatlining” and “exiting” are not the same propositions.
In any event, most central banks are expanding their assets, more than making up for any “shrinkage” by the Fed. Yardeni Research points out that the major central banks assets grew by $1.6 trillion in the last 12 months. What difference will it make if the Fed cuts back by $10 billion per month? Almost nothing -- not even enough to be considered a rounding error.
Global central banks now have $21.7 trillion in assets, and that figure is heading to $24 trillion by next September, according to my calculations. Where in this scenario is there any sort of “normal”? The combined actions of the world’s central banks have never happened before, so how do you characterize “normal” in that context? You can’t.
It's not really Trumpism. The global powerhouse Central Banks The Fed, Bank of England, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Swiss National Bank etc have been buying anything they can lay there hands on. Started off as an emergency measure to stop the Global Recession 2009 but they didn't stop.
When you say Assets do you mean shares?It's not really Trumpism. The global powerhouse Central Banks The Fed, Bank of England, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Swiss National Bank etc have been buying anything they can lay there hands on. Started off as an emergency measure to stop the Global Recession 2009 but they didn't stop.
The Risks in Central-Bank Balance Sheets Are Clear
$21.7 trillion in assets as of December 2017! Even when they were neutral all monies made on what they owned were recycled into new purchases. At some point with a "return to normalisation" they'd theoretically want to sell their assets to the market. Is there a market for it? Who can buy that much? When is the credit cycle going to end?
Different central banks bought varied mixes. Overall it's mainly bonds/debt of various types. BoJ was unusual in purchasing a lot of shares/equities.When you say Assets do you mean shares?