Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

General world climate crisis articles

The UK doesn't have a minister for climate change, does it, or even for the environment? The closest match I can find is Business, Energy and Clean Growth, which is Greg Hands, and Defra, which is George Useless.
 
Another fantastic article on global warming from waPo:


 
Nomad Century by Gaia Vince - acclimatising to crisis
This well-sourced book sets out where will be habitable in our future hothouse world and how we should manage the transition

perhaps now more than ever, our perspiring world needs smart, radical idealists. Nomad Century, which takes in anthropology, demography, technology, politics, economics and sociology, should be on the reading list of anyone and everyone in any position of power. It is not simply a future atlas of human geography showing where will be habitable and for how many, but a hard-hitting must-read on how we will need to live in the coming decades to secure the long-term survival of humankind. It serves as both an obituary for the Holocene, the simpler, cooler world in which our ancestors lived, and a birth notice for the Anthropocene, the warmer world we have foolishly made for ourselves.

This looks to be an essential book on climate change and how countries need to adapt to the reality, including accommodating billions of climate refugees.
Anyone here read it? This FT review by Anjana Ahuja makes me want to buy it.

paywall busted:
 

"Almost all hail is created in supercells, or storms with updrafts of rising air that slowly rotate. Small pieces of ice, called embryos, get swept into those updrafts like “a fountain of particles,” said Matt Kumjian, a meteorologist at Penn State University who studies the internal dynamics of storms. The embryos smash into water droplets, becoming hailstones that continue to grow until they are too heavy to stay suspended and then fall to the ground"
 
Nomad Century by Gaia Vince - acclimatising to crisis
This well-sourced book sets out where will be habitable in our future hothouse world and how we should manage the transition



This looks to be an essential book on climate change and how countries need to adapt to the reality, including accommodating billions of climate refugees.
Anyone here read it? This FT review by Anjana Ahuja makes me want to buy it.

paywall busted:

Will order that, thanks.
 
Global potable water shortages and a huge ice cube melting away in the brine:

Yes, it's very bad, but
 

B.C.'s sunny, dry weather is leading to major drought conditions in parts of the province, causing devastating impacts for some wildlife.

Video posted to social media recently shows tens of thousands of dead salmon lying at the bottom of a dry creek in Bella Bella.

William Housty, conservation manager with the Heiltsuk Nation, told CTV News Vancouver the sight's "unheard of."

"Nobody … that's living here in the community has ever seen anything like this before," Housty said.



"Unfortunately something I think we're going to see more often as global warming continues at the pace that it's at," Lina Azeez with Watershed Watch Salmon Society told CTV News.

Azeez, who lives in Port Coquitlam, said she's also seen the shocking impacts of the drought in her own backyard.

"I saw a little juvenile salmon at the bottom end of Hyde Creek. As I biked along it, it just suddenly dried out, it was bone dry," she said.

"When salmon go, the building blocks of our coastal ecosystems start to fall apart. We depend on salmon, bears depend on salmon, forests depend on salmon."
 
Wasn't sure where to post this thoughtful article about the problem with a lot of clifi, by Rebecca Tamás in the FT:

Why does imagining the end of the world feel easier than saving it?

snippages:
Apocalyptic climate fantasies often reveal a deep desire to simply get it over with. We can imagine the end of the world much more easily than we can imagine saving it. In this kind of fiction, the inequalities of human society, the plant and animal extinctions, the cruelties and complications that define our real climate crisis, disappear. Such narratives satisfy our craving to wipe the slate clean, to begin from zero, without all the mess and suffering and personal sacrifice that climate action will demand of us.

Kingsnorth and Hine write that “Secretly, we all think we are doomed: even the politicians think this; even the environmentalists,” as if they have some omniscient insight into the minds of all humanity. The smug assumption is that everyone has already given up, so why not you, the reader, too?
This perspective, like Franzen’s, often comes from those who are privileged — white, western, financially stable, not in the midst of flood or fire. It is very easy to accept that you’re “doomed” and that there’s no point trying to avert or disrupt climate change, when your home is not being washed away, when your children are not acutely malnourished because of drought. For many at the sharp end of environmental destruction, especially indigenous communities and those in the global south, hope is not a choice, it is a necessity.
This year, 33 million people in Pakistan — about half the population of the UK — were affected by unprecedented floods that submerged large parts of their country. More than 1,600 have died, according to the Red Cross, including some 500 children. Citizens of the countries most vulnerable to climate change do not have the luxury of waiting for humanity’s final fall. They need us to work together, pressuring our governments to avert the higher global temperatures that will only increase their suffering.

Paywall busted: archive.ph
 
Not quite sure if it fits here, but I've just started skimming this House of Lords report which I thought was interesting and worth sharing here
 
climate change giveth, climate change taketh away.

It’s a grim inside joke among glacial archaeologists that their field of study has been one of the few beneficiaries of climate change. But while retreating ice and snow makes some prehistoric treasures briefly accessible, exposure to the elements threatens to swiftly destroy them.

Once soft organic materials — leather, textiles, arrow fletchings — surface, researchers have a year at most to rescue them for conservation before the items degrade and are lost forever. “After they are gone,” Dr. Taylor said, “our opportunity to use them to understand the past and prepare for the future is gone with them.”

E. James Dixon, former director of the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology at the University of New Mexico, agreed. “The sheer scale of the loss relative to the number of archaeologists researching these sites is overwhelming,” he said. “It’s like an archaeological mass extinction where certain types of sites are all disappearing at approximately the same time.”


 
This doesn't bode well.


What's the source for this "estimated death toll is 2-3 billion" in "20-30 years" claim? The IPCC doesn't say anything like that.

The tweeter seems to be some kind of new age grifter who says he got the image (which doesn't seem to include that claim) at "a psychedelic symposium" from "an influential financier". Was that his mum after she lent him money to buy more drugs?
 
Back
Top Bottom