Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

GB News: a thread so you never have to watch it

Just had a peek over on digitalspy, to see what posters thought of the launch, pretty funny TBH. :D

Why does this look like it’s coming from a bunker, are we about to be nuked?

It makes Alex Salmond's Alba launch look professional.

Rather fuzzy isn't it. And becoming more out of sync every minute.
About 50 years out of sync!

Why is everything black. Andrew blends into the background with that suit.... It looks as if the channel is in mourning.
Already?

This is a historically poor TV channel launch. After all the hype, it's literally a bloke sat in a shed with a broken microphone broadcasting over dial-up internet.

Looks like Neil is sitting in one of those old public toilets.
2s.jpg

I've never seen anything like it, makes that Alan Partridge chat show comedy look professional.

Think most are just astonished at the shoddy and damn right hilarious production values on show.

I think this channel is going to be a compulsive watch, before it crashes and burns. 'Appointment to view' says Andrew Neil. Yes, but not for the reasons you think.
 
Does it do a decent weather forecast ?

hqdefault.jpg
 
I just saw the weather forecast. The names of the cities were in Arial bold with a bit of a black drop shadow on them. While some clouds kinda jerked around the screen. It's gold.
 
I don't seem to have a Channel 216. Skips straight from RT to Film 4.

There's something wring with your Freesat box, there's loads of channels between RT & Film4.

207 CNN
208 Bloomberg Television
209 NHK World HD
210 CNBC
212 BBC News (SD)
214 Arirang
215 TRT World
216 Gbeebies
250 SportyStuffTV
 
There's something wring with your Freesat box, there's loads of channels between RT & Film4.

207 CNN
208 Bloomberg Television
209 NHK World HD
210 CNBC
212 BBC News (SD)
214 Arirang
215 TRT World
216 Gbeebies
250 SportyStuffTV

Should really be below Babestation by the sounds of it.
 
My inclination with this is to ignore it, block them on social media, don't retweet their manufactured outrage, don't discuss them on Urban, and if anyone in real life mentions it just stare at them blankly like they've tried to discuss an obscure piece of Thai cinema.
i thought you were all about people like apichartpong weerasethakul and similar independent film makers.
 
I am not going to link to their twitter account, but they have tweeted ratings from last night -

BARB Data 1900-2300
#1 GBNews 164.4k 1.1 share
#2 BBC News 133k 0.9 share
#3 Sky News 57k 0.4 share

* Share is total share of all TV viewing in the UK.

That may look shocking at first, but Sunday evenings don't produce big ratings for news channels, and clearly there was some interest in their launch, I doubt they will ever be in that top position again, and I doubt they will ever tweet ratings again.
 
Well, I for one will be tuning in often. It's brilliant. I've never seen anything so shit on TV. Car crash TV has always rated well.
 
As often is the case, I do wonder if those it is aimed at will care enough about these flaws to stop watching. I wouldn't be surprised if they either a) don't care or b) don't see them as flaws, and turn into a dedicated following, propped up by the outrage market.
 
Is it much worse than ordinary daytime TV?

Not as good as the daytime films on Horror where four people try to save the world from meteoric bombardment with the help of some old IBM PCs in a windowless room.
 
DotCommunist said:
not now while its billy basic and amateur but if it starts getting the ratings he'll be on that like a fly on shit.
It's never going to have the money.
 
As often is the case, I do wonder if those it is aimed at will care enough about these flaws to stop watching. I wouldn't be surprised if they either a) don't care or b) don't see them as flaws, and turn into a dedicated following, propped up by the outrage market.
The technical issues are not really the main problem. Being out of synch and occasionally giving the impression that the sound engineer is King Tubby would be neither here nor there if the content wasn't impossibly dull. Maybe they have some show that will turn out to be an ace up their sleeve. But it seems to work on the premise that you can just point a camera at Michelle Dewberry and expect her to say something interesting. Even experienced broadcasters are going to crash and burn based on that model.
 
Back
Top Bottom