Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gaza under attack yet again.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So do you think Obama/US is being controlled by Israel?
If @MJayRosenberg is to be believed AIPAC pretty much control Congress and if anyone ought to have an insight into how things operate in this respect it ought to be him, he used to work for them.
 
If you're not anti-Semitic then it strikes me as odd (if not suspicious) to be posting crude propaganda pictures from anti-Semitic sources.

It could be posted on other sites. Also, I seem to remember a jewish journalist in the States, writing an article criticizing Obama for being scared of the pro-Israel Lobby.
So, people can be forgiven for focussing the US-Isreal relationship from different angles.

I would add that recently no US politicians dared to miss a vote in congress related to the supply of arms to Isreali. The reason being that the politicians are worried about having their sponsors pulled.
 
Last edited:
It could be posted on other sites.

Indeed it could, yet if it has a watermark that advertises a dodgy site then in my opinion that detracts from whatever worth it has. Not to mention that even without the dodgy watermark the picture looks to me like just the sort of thing that feeds into the delusions of hasbara types, which is not surprising considering the source.

Contrast it with those infographics showing how most of the victims of Israeli aggression in the Gaza strip are young civilians, propaganda which is much harder for the hasbara types to twist in their favour.
 
Fuck! This is the last place I'd expect to see some of Dees' vile fascist artwork.

You've been doing a great job on this thread Mr.Bishie, this was just a lapse, right?
 
Even more true today with the addition of the Christian right.

It wouldn't be true even if he did say it but do you have a reliable source for the Sharon quote? Because if you google it you mainly get Press TV and conspiracy websites (the website of holocaust denier David Irving is the 6th result).
 
It wouldn't be true even if he did say it but do you have a reliable source for the Sharon quote? Because if you google it you mainly get Press TV and conspiracy websites (the website of holocaust denier David Irving is the 6th result).
It wouldn't be true? How do you explain the unequivocal support Israel gets from the US?
 
It wouldn't be true? How do you explain the unequivocal support Israel gets from the US?

It's a bullshit racist quote from anti semites.

Don't get me wrong the Israeli lobby in America is incredibly strong. As in the Irish American. As is the Oil Lobby. But the jews no more control america, than the Saudis or Dublin does.
 
It wouldn't be true? How do you explain the unequivocal support Israel gets from the US?

The US doesn't unequivocally support Israel. It generally does because Israel's actions usually help implement US policy in the Middle East and a Israel's behaviour is supported by those who do have a lot of power in the US political system, the military industrial complex and other corporate interests.

Israel is a country of 8 million people, Jews make up 2% of the US population and AIPAC has a budget of $67M. How could they control the foreign policy of the worlds largest superpower?
 
The US doesn't unequivocally support Israel. It generally does because Israel's actions usually help implement US policy in the Middle East and a Israel's behaviour is supported by those who do have a lot of power in the US political system, the military industrial complex and other corporate interests.

Israel is a country of 8 million people, Jews make up 2% of the US population and AIPAC has a budget of $67M. How could they control the foreign policy of the worlds largest superpower?
Okay. When doesn't USA unequivocally support Israel? As you said.
 
Last edited:
One example is that the US (under George Bush) refused Israel permission to bomb Iran.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/sep/25/iran.israelandthepalestinians

There are others. We will not necessary know everytime the US doesn't support Israel or forces Israel to change it's policy. And Israel knows full well that it can not seriously defy the US on which it is nearly entirely reliant.
No fair enough. I agree

Domestically including Palestine they get carte blanche though.
 
It's a bullshit racist quote from anti semites.

Don't get me wrong the Israeli lobby in America is incredibly strong. As in the Irish American. As is the Oil Lobby. But the jews no more control america, than the Saudis or Dublin does.

I agree, but as you say the Israeli lobby in America is incredibly strong, without wanting to go into conspiracloonry, I do find myself asking why? The Saudis, oil obviously, the Irish? I suppose sentiment, but how does support for Israel remain so steadfast in the light of the atrocities being committed.
I would honestly like a balanced answer however trying to find one on the internet always leads you to quite virulent anti Semitic sites and as a result I have stopped looking.
 
It's a bullshit racist quote from anti semites.

Don't get me wrong the Israeli lobby in America is incredibly strong. As in the Irish American. As is the Oil Lobby. But the jews no more control america, than the Saudis or Dublin does.

The pro-zionist entity lobby does not control America, but pretty much directs its foreign policy in the Middle East and Asia via a disproportionate amount of influence and power in the US. Come election time in the US, and you'll find all the presidential candidates fighting to speak at an AIPAC conference.
 
I was wearing my GAZA T-shirt last night and got a kebab on way home. I know the peeps in the bab shop and they liked theT-shirt but asked what I thought about about IS (ISIS). I know these chaps as I've been there a few times before and they are Kurdish Turks but moved here 10+ years ago.

We talked whilst I was waiting and discussed the general fucked up state of affairs in Syria and Iraq right now and generally agreed on what and why it's happening.

However they seemed a bit put out when I told them that the PKK missed killing me and my girlfriend at the time in Istanbul by 2 minutes many years ago in the central Bazaar in Istanbul.
 
Last edited:
P.S I'm pretty sure I'm not not a target but was so close in the 7/7 bombings too.

My Piccadilly tube tube pulled into Kings Cross just as the bomb went off on the on the train that left in other direction.
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/22/us-mideast-gaza-parliament-idUSKBN0GM1IM20140822

"Palestinian lawmakers have accused Israel of an anti-democratic crackdown as the Gaza war rages, with dozens of elected officials detained, placed under investigation or restricted in their movements.


Of the 84 MPs elected to the Palestinian parliament from the West Bank and East Jerusalem in 2006, 36 are in Israeli jails, two-thirds of them under what is known as "administrative detention", where the evidence against them is not disclosed.

The measures are the among the harshest ever against elected Palestinians in the occupied territories and come on top of restrictions imposed on Arab-Israelis in the Israeli parliament.

In the latest move, Khalida Jarrar, an MP from Ramallah, the main city in the West Bank, said she was woken up by Israeli troops in the early hours of Wednesday and told she had 24 hours to leave the city and move to Jericho, in the desert."
 
The pro-zionist entity lobby does not control America, but pretty much directs its foreign policy in the Middle East and Asia via a disproportionate amount of influence and power in the US. Come election time in the US, and you'll find all the presidential candidates fighting to speak at an AIPAC conference.

Why?
 
One example is that the US (under George Bush) refused Israel permission to bomb Iran.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/sep/25/iran.israelandthepalestinians

There are others. We will not necessary know everytime the US doesn't support Israel or forces Israel to change it's policy. And Israel knows full well that it can not seriously defy the US on which it is nearly entirely reliant.

The USA has used its Security Council veto 42 times since 1972 in order to veto Security Council Resolutions critical of Israel. It has only used its veto 37 times on every other issue in the whole world since WW2. That is pretty unequivocal, unconditional support for Israel in the top forum, where it really matters. They have written Israel a blank cheque and flourished it in public so that everyone else knows - although I never see this mentioned in the media.

It suits both sides to maintain an illusion that Israel and the USA fall out or "disagree" about things occasionally but I don't see how anyone could seriously argue that there are meaningful divergences of policy.

The example you give of the US banning Israel's sourcing Chinese weapons, will be far more to do with loss of profits or kickbacks etc by the US elite than any political falling out. The "refusing permission" stuff merely re-states the one-sided reality of the relationship, it does not undermine the fact that the US gives unconditional support to Israel.
 
The USA has used its Security Council veto 42 times since 1972 in order to veto Security Council Resolutions critical of Israel. It has only used its veto 37 times on every other issue in the whole world since WW2. That is pretty unequivocal, unconditional support for Israel in the top forum, where it really matters. They have written Israel a blank cheque and flourished it in public so that everyone else knows - although I never see this mentioned in the media.

Israel is a US client state and generally does what the US wants it to do so of course they will normally veto critical UN resolutions.

The US did not ban Israel's sourcing Chinese weapons, the US banned Israel from selling weapons to the Chinese. This is not to do with loss of profits directly but because it was against the US national interest to improve China's anti-radar capabilities. And where the US national interest clashed with the Israeli national interest, the US forced Israel to back down. Similarly when Israel was told not to bomb Iran, it also was forced to back down. These things would not happen if Israel directed US foreign policy.

When the IDF kills Palestinians, it does not go against the US national interest and the use of high tech modern weaponry certainly boosts the profits of the defence industry, who have much more influence over US foreign policy.
 
Here's an interesting article about the Israel lobby. I'm not sure if I agree with it - it's very difficult to establish just how much power it has, and quite what that power is conditioned on. But anyway:
But in a conflict between allies the game is never zero sum, as both sides value the alliance itself. Thus the interests of key U.S. allies tend to be adopted by the White House, in the service of maintaining them as allies. That junior partners in such alliances wield disproportionate power is unremarkable. Indeed, some scholars conclude that 'the dominant feature in the relation between international and regional powers is the manipulation of the former by the latter.’
http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/knowing_too_much_and_the_jewish_lobby

I think talk of the lobby controlling American foreign policy even on specific issues such as settlements and war in Gaza lacks the powerful explanatory factor it appears to have. Further such talk can segue into anti-semitic conspiracy mongering. Not that I have a problem with it as such, but I wish people were more careful about it.

It should also be noted that such talk removes blame from Obama and the American administration the more it removes their agency. There's a hasbara theme that the Palestinian cause is this leftist anti-imperialist stupidity that supports ISIS and supported Saddam etc. The real problem is that the cause is in danger of losing it's anti-imperialist character.
 
Israel is a US client state and generally does what the US wants it to do so of course they will normally veto critical UN resolutions.

The US did not ban Israel's sourcing Chinese weapons, the US banned Israel from selling weapons to the Chinese. This is not to do with loss of profits directly but because it was against the US national interest to improve China's anti-radar capabilities. And where the US national interest clashed with the Israeli national interest, the US forced Israel to back down. Similarly when Israel was told not to bomb Iran, it also was forced to back down. These things would not happen if Israel directed US foreign policy.

When the IDF kills Palestinians, it does not go against the US national interest and the use of high tech modern weaponry certainly boosts the profits of the defence industry, who have much more influence over US foreign policy.
Fair enough but it still doesn't explain the seemingly unequivocal support from all levels of American society?
 
Fair enough but it still doesn't explain the seemingly unequivocal support from all levels of American society?
A very bright American friend of mine (PhD etc) refused to understand that criticism of Israel did not automatically equal anti-semitism. It's just drip-drip media conditioning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom