Bakunin
I am Noodle's bitch.
The CPS have now been handed the file on the Ian Tomlinson case.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8183293.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8183293.stm
Deborah Glass, the IPCC Commissioner for London, said:
We have had a remarkable response from the public and I would like to thank those people who have contacted us for all their help. Much of the video evidence we have passed to the CPS was collected by members of the public on cameras or mobile phones.”
The CPS have now been handed the file on the Ian Tomlinson case.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8183293.stm
Guardian said:The Metropolitan police learned today that one of its officers could face prosecution for the manslaughter of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 demonstrations.
From the Guardian article...
The officer is understood to have faced allegations of aggression earlier in his career, after becoming involved in a road rage incident while off duty. The Met's vetting procedures are said to have failed to notice that the officer had an unresolved disciplinary matter.
That being said, I'm not exactly hopeful that we will see a prosecution brought against the officer in question.
Surprised? You won't be:
Investigators decided there was no evidence of police wrongdoing in the death of Ian Tomlinson just three days after he collapsed at the G20 protests, it has emerged tonight. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) planned to announce that it had completed its assessment into Tomlinson's death on 1 April and discovered nothing suspicious. At 11.30am on 4 April, investigators prepared a document announcing Tomlinson died of a heart attack after being caught up among protesters "dressed entirely in black" who, it said, were charging police.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/aug/07/ian-tomlinson-death-ipcc-g20
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/aug/07/ian-tomlinson-death-police-memos
What a fucking shambles.
But it was idiotic to expect anymore from the Independant Police Lies Commission. Evil evil cunts.
Video footage showed a policeman apparently hit him on the leg with a baton and push him over on 1 April.
Other images suggested that when Mr Tomlinson fell, he hit the ground with some force.
So have we found out the results of the third PM? Is the investigation still going on? Just how fucking long is it going to take? Is anything ever going to actually come out of this? Before any witnesses die of old age?
Home Office FoI Release on G20 Protests
A week ago, I mentioned that Home Office had received a Freedom of Information request asking for documents it held or produced between 1st and 8th April of this year that were either "briefings, notes, minutes, emails or letters prepared for ministers and senior officials concerning the 1 April 2009 G20 'financial fools day' demonstration" or "memos, papers, emails, minutes or documents relating to either the 1st April 2009 demonstration at the Bank of England or Ian Tomlinson’s death".
The Home Office website indicated that these were available "in hard copy only" so I requested them on Monday and, with surprising speed, they turned up in the post today.
[...]
On the morning of 2 April, the day after the protests, the Independent Police Complaints Commission sent an e-mail to the Home Office saying that a man "had collapse in an alley way during the protests" but that the IPCC did "not know yet whether he was a demonstrator". That afternoon, Jacqui Smith's private secretary circulated an e-mail with suggested comments for a statement by the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, expressing the government's "thanks and appreciation to the police for their professionalism", along with a briefing for the Chancellor.
[...]
On 8 April, an e-mail from Stephen Webb was sent to the IPCC asking if they would now take over direct control of the investigation rather than supervise the City of London police. The response (presumably from Nick Hardwick, the IPCC's chair) is far from firm or decisive: "on what I know now, I can't imagine that we won't do this an an independent - but we need to make a proper decision. And there are v significant resource issues - city have a huge team on the case which we cannot match."
That afternoon, an e-mail from Anna O'Rourke, the Commission Secretary, confirms that the IPCC intends to resolve the problem of lack of resources by paying the City of London police.
The IPCC today confirmed it had received a new complaint from Tomlinson's family, who believe possible attempts to cover up police involvement in the death have not yet been investigated.
The complaint alleges that a senior Met officer "misled" investigators by suggesting Tomlinson, 47, fell to the ground minutes before the police attack – which was captured on video – took place. The senior officer's claim, which had an impact on the investigation, does not appear to have been supported by any evidence.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/30/ian-tomlinson-family-metropolitan-officerThe Tomlinson family have become more vocal about their concerns about a suspected cover-up in recent weeks. Today, they will speak at a vigil in Tomlinson's memory. It will be held at 6pm near the Bank of England, close to the spot where he was attacked on his way home from work.
No police person will ever be convicted in connection with the death of Ian Tomlinson, of that you can be sure.
No police person has ever been convicted in connection with the death of a member of the public whilst they were on duty.
The second one's not true.
(cf. PC John Dougal, PS Mark Kitching, PI Geoffrey Ellerker, maybe more)
http://www.lasthours.org.uk/news/g20-another-version-of-the-truth/Update: Two more of the Forward Intelligence (FIT) officers who witnessed (and ignored) the attack on Ian Tomlinson have been identified as U2934 (F3) and U2337 (F4) from the TSG (2 Area).
Last night, with phenomenally insensitive timing The Times newspaper published a puff piece aimed at rehabilitating the Metropolitan Police's Territorial Support Group, at exactly the same time as Ian Tomlinson's family were attending a candlelit vigil to remember him at Royal Exchange Buildings, near to the spot were he was attacked by a TSG officer on April 1st. The article was later pulled from The Times website, but not before copies were cached by other online news services.
In the article Chris Allison, the Met's kettler-in-chief, explained that the TSG are just misunderstood and do a lot of great work for charity...
The Times piece was published here:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6939597.ece
See traces here:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q="G20+riot+police+to+go+on+good+will+tour"
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/12/442629.htmlOfficers from the Territorial Support Group, which has been criticised for its heavy-handedness during several protests, are embarking on a good will tour to explain to people what their job really entails.
The road shows across the capital have been given the go-ahead after the death of Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests earlier this year which also resulted in hundreds of complaints.
[...]
Part of the show will involve getting members of the public to interact with the TSG officers. They will be given different scenarios and then be asked to make decisions like senior officers. They will also be given full TSG kit to wear.
Mr Allison said that lots of people thought officers wore balaclavas to disguise their identity when in fact they wore them for protection.
[...]
His officers will also be pushing figures that show in the last few years the number of allegations against them has fallen. From August 2006 to July 2007 there were 1,740 allegations but this fell in the last year, which included G20, to 1,114.
The GMC has said the fitness to practise of a pathologist criticised over his report into a man's death at the G20 protests is "impaired".
A disciplinary panel upheld allegations earlier this week against Dr Freddy Patel of misconduct and "deficient professional performance".
Not much I would imagine.
• Told the jury to ignore the fact that the director of public prosecutions (DPP) chose not to bring criminal proceedings against the officer. "That was not a final decision, but a provisional decision," he said. "He may review that decision after the inquest."