Corax
Luke 5:16
Another fascinating insight into their way of thinking...
Just emailed Matthew Moore a link to the Police Oracle forums. Just in case he fancies following it up with something in a similar vein.
Another fascinating insight into their way of thinking...
i bet the officer on Police Oracle who stated he wanted to burn all the protesters alive is glad he deleted his post in time..
That post hasn't been deleted and it doesn't say he 'wanted to', it says "I have no time for these G20 demonstrators, they can spray them all with petrol as far as I am concerned, and throw in a match, most are people just out for a fight with the police" - ie he is saying he doesn't give a shit, not that he wants or intends to do anything. The poster is also (according to their profile) a retired officer, not someone who was involved in g20 or even still serving.i bet the officer on Police Oracle who stated he wanted to burn all the protesters alive is glad he deleted his post in time..
That post hasn't been deleted and it doesn't say he 'wanted to', it says "I have no time for these G20 demonstrators, they can spray them all with petrol as far as I am concerned, and throw in a match, most are people just out for a fight with the police" - ie he is saying he doesn't give a shit, not that he wants or intends to do anything. The poster is also (according to their profile) a retired officer, not someone who was involved in g20 or even still serving.
At 7.30pm on Wednesday 1 April, as Mr Tomlinson lay dying on the pavement near the Royal Exchange in the City of London, Sir Paul Stephenson, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, was several miles away at a party at Peelers restaurant, on the fifth floor of New Scotland Yard, to mark the retirement of the assistant commissioner Alf Hitchcock.
According to one guest: "He kept going out into the corridor, on his mobile. He looked very unhappy, stressed."
Four hours later, at 11.36pm, Scotland Yard issued a press release (see over), that, we now know, was seriously misleading - not because it included a direct falsehood, but because it failed to include the most important part of the truth, that Mr Tomlinson died after apparently being struck and pushed to the ground by a police officer. This press release was the result of some intense argument in the Yard's press bureau, with an earlier draft having been rejected. <snip>
However, both the IPCC and Scotland Yard say there had been no allegation of contact at the time: "It was treated as an unexplained death within the area of a policing operation that would need to be properly investigated and, therefore, the IPCC were informed as is routine practice in these circumstances."
Yet senior figures at Scotland Yard last week insisted, on the condition of anonymity, that the apparent assault on Mr Tomlinson had been detected by the police control room at Cobalt Street, south London, as soon as it happened and also that it had been "phoned in" by a chief inspector on the ground.
A man died, and if journalists had not taken an active interest in the case there is a possibility that only one view of that death would ever have seen the light of day. That view was relatively easy for the police service and the government to live with. Instead we are now very aware of other possibilities which are much less comfortable for these bodies. No finding in law has been made, but few people would dispute that Ian Tomlinson’s death raises important questions of public policy. Without journalism, those questions might not have been confronted.
When Ian Tomlinson died during the G-20 conference in London earlier this month, Police Constable Rob Ward was accused of pushing him violently to the ground, causing internal injuries resulting in his death soon after the incident. This innocent newspaper vendor was not even taking part in the demonstration, but was just walking slowly and inoffensively past when he was allegedly accosted by PC Ward.
Piggy Oracle said:A man died, and if journalists had not taken an active interest in the case there is a possibility that only one view of that death would ever have seen the light of day. That view was relatively easy for the police service and the government to live with. Instead we are now very aware of other possibilities which are much less comfortable for these bodies. No finding in law has been made, but few people would dispute that Ian Tomlinson’s death raises important questions of public policy. Without journalism, those questions might not have been confronted.
...which statement would be more convincing had police oracle not banned a journalist from their forums for asking questions the circle-jerking OB didn't approve of.
Unless he died of swine flu, we are no longer interested.
The Metropolitan Police is to be investigated over its handling of the media following the death of Ian Tomlinson during the G20 protests.
...
Mr Tomlinson's family say the Met knew its officers had contact with him before his death. The City of London Police force will also be investigated.
Hang on, did I really hear on the news (BBC London) just now that the person who killed Ian Tomlinson may have been 'a protestor dressed as a police officer'
wtf