I'm seriously considering working from home every day.
I get to walk my kids to school. I get to sleep for an extra hour (or two), I can have dinner with the family rather than warming up something in the microwave and bolting it down before putting the kids to bed. In fact I get to see the kids for longer than half an hour a day.
I have video calling if people really want to see my face. I can attend meetings with that in pretty much any meeting room. I can take phone calls from three different services on my laptop. Tickets, emails all work as normal. My team has its own chatroom, I can contact anybody in the company on instant messenger.
I don't have to leave home in the dark to wrestle with fucking idiots on a variety of station platforms just to get to a desk in an office that I can recreate at home. I did it for 3 days this week and it was brilliant. Came in to work today and it was awful.
The only downside is... I don't know. I'm going to tell the team to just work from home whenever they like. Fuck this shit.
The kabbess has permanently worked from home for at least the last five years. The last only downside is if you don't see anyone, the loneliness very slowly drives you nuts.
In the end, the kabbess went part time (then started a part time degree actually at a university, not distance learning), whilst I started working a day a week from home, partly to keep her company. Five days a week just talking to yourself is too much year after year. At first it's great, then it's funny to laugh about it, then it's not so funny to laugh about it.
Not that I wouldn't work five days a week from home if I had the chance!
I agree with you, of course. It's stupid that hundreds of thousands of us spend 1-2 hours each way pissing about on shitty trains every day. Totally unnecessary.The loneliness is a problem for many people. How things are working out though, living in city centres is too expensive, (not that you would want to anyway, me neither), so more and more people commuting greater and greater distances. Yet more work than ever can be done remotely via a reliable internet connection, so less need to schlep in to a city centre. Perhaps an answer would be to have business hubs where you rented a desk in a place local to your house in an office that had business services and other humans doing similar..? (without it being like the wanky Old St Start-up type places)
The fact that we might NEED some social interaction only bites us on the bum a few years down the line.
Yeah, that's pretty much how it goes.Which is what dogs are for
I have Frau Bahn and the kids floating around the place, for your good kabbess I imagine she's on her own from like 7 in the morning until 7 in the evening when you're in town, that would get lonely even with dog.
and, more important, to get outI occasionally get the Piccadily line in, but it is right fucked at the moment as they haven't got enough trains or something - luckily have plenty of alternative routes.
I can work from home one day a week but I prefer coming into the office - a 30 minute commute means it is (usually) fairly easy to get in.
Stuck on Thameslink Station for 10mins this morning.
And pretty much all this week, I've been late for work.
South Western Trains is the pits.
Can't wait to get my bike fixed.
They couldn't even be bothered to cancel my train this morning, it just wasn't on the board at all.
What's it got to do with "privatisation" when both stations are owned and managed by Network Rail......?To ease your blues, I see toilet charges have been "stopped" at both Victoria and Charing Cross. Not sure if this is temporary or permanent mind. They should never have charged in the first place, bloody privatisation.
Not sure about Charing X, but the is a free loo in Wetherspoons at Victoria amongst other places.
Charing Cross and Victoria stations end toilet charges - BBC News
Errr....Network Rail isn't a profit making operation. And you realise that it costs money to maintain a public toilet, right? And I'm not even sure there wasn't a charge under BR.When all under one roof, travellers were paying for a "service", which, maybe incorrectly I saw including station facilities. Since they were broken up it all came down to Network rail looking after their own needs and profits and it didn't matter that most of the people using the loo's had paid to use the train service. I also feel, again incorrectly, that these days Netork Rail see themselves more responsible to train operators than to passengers.
To ease your blues, I see toilet charges have been "stopped" at both Victoria and Charing Cross. Not sure if this is temporary or permanent mind. They should never have charged in the first place, bloody privatisation.
Not sure about Charing X, but the is a free loo in Wetherspoons at Victoria amongst other places.
Charing Cross and Victoria stations end toilet charges - BBC News
Waterloo is a lot busier station than Waterloo East, and at WE the toilets are behind the ticket barriers, and at Waterloo they aren't. And I'm not sure how wanting to recoup the money spent on maintaining and cleaning makes them "gouging fucks"?Free at Waterloo East, 30p at Waterloo. Gouging for fucks.
Waterloo is a lot busier station than Waterloo East, and at WE the toilets are behind the ticket barriers, and at Waterloo they aren't. And I'm not sure how wanting to recoup the money spent on maintaining and cleaning makes them "gouging fucks"?
No, its the duty to provide basic public services free of charge.
Err....no it's not.
I'm not sure why it is a "duty" for a property owner to provide free toilet facilities for anyone who walks in off the street? Most other businesses won't do that.Why isn't it? Toilets are a fundamental need for all of us. The costs of running them will obviously be paid for through other means, so for stations it is fares, rents levied on shops at the station, etc. It is just common decency to provide these basic services free.
I'm not sure why it is a "duty" for a property owner to provide free toilet facilities for anyone who walks in off the street? Most other business won't do that.
*sigh*
Why isn't it a duty for an industry that receives huge amounts of public subsidy to provide free toilet facilities at the train stations? By your logic train operating companies should charge passengers for using the toilets on their trains - it isn't their duty to provide them free after all.
That's not my logic at all. If you're on a train then you are a paying customer. Joe Bloggs who walks into a station off the street isn't, necessarily, a paying customer. Just like someone who walks into a restaurant or pub without actually buying anything isn't a paying customer. I'd like to see you demanding to use the toilet at any of those establishments making out that it was some sort of "right" and see how far you get.
And all the money NR has gets invested back into the railway. NR who are heavily in debt btw.