chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
They're the same people who arrived at Clarkson's quaint little farm shop in droves, just to get their face on the telly.
Wouldn't know. I don't watch Clarkson's Farm. Do you?
They're the same people who arrived at Clarkson's quaint little farm shop in droves, just to get their face on the telly.
XR/Insulate Britain apparently. They all live next to Clarkson in their town houses in London. Probably Islington. Or that farm he runs. Probably in the home counties. All drinking soya lattes and cycling everywhere the cunts. Probably funded by Corbyn/Russia/insulation manufacturers anyway...
Are they? Could you give a little more detail?They're the same people who arrived at Clarkson's quaint little farm shop in droves, just to get their face on the telly.
They're the same people who arrived at Clarkson's quaint little farm shop in droves, just to get their face on the telly.
The marijuana cigarettes they bought from Jeremy Clarkson's shop with our tax money, I think you'll find!I believe you'll find they're all jobless, feckless crusties too high on the marijuana cigarettes brought with our tax money to know what day it is, the dirty unwashed bastards.
All approved by the EU. Brexit betrayedThe marijuana cigarettes they bought from Jeremy Clarkson's shop with our tax money, I think you'll find!
I could but you already know.Are they? Could you give a little more detail?
injunction against insulate
Insulate Britain: Injunction granted against M25 protesters
National Highways wins a High Court ruling against protesters who have been disrupting the M25.www.bbc.co.uk
They’re well lagged.Are prison cells insulated.
I think another complexity arises with leasehold properties whenever they were built. When I lived in a leasehold flat, my downstairs neighbour and I asked for permission from the freehold company to get get cavity wall insulation done under a discounted council scheme and they refused to agree to it.
I can't remember the exact reasons they gave. It was something along the lines of:
1 - they were responsible for the fabric of the building,2 - only they could initiate and authorise the work - we couldn't authorise any work ourselves which affected the fabric of the building,3 - the lease only covered maintenance of the building and that cavity wall insulation was an upgrade,4 - although we were willing to pay for the CWI they wouldn't be able to recover any costs they incurred as a result of the CWI via the service charge as it would be outside the scope of the lease5 - even though the walls around mine and my neighbours flats only effectively enclosed our properties there were adjoining walls for the communal stairway and they were concerned about the impact of any "spillage" or insulation into the walls of the communal stairway
I think, primarily, in my case, it was the freehold company being constrained by the terms of the leases. The leases defined who was responsible for what and how any expenses could be recovered. The lease was very specific about "keeping the building in good repair". The legal interpretation appears to be that "good repair" cannot include any element of improvement. Later legislation to protect tenants and lessees has resulted in an inability to improve many leasehold properties as the costs cannot be legally recovered from the lessees. As a result the quality of the buildings are "set in stone" in the period they were built. They cannot legally be improved.You make a good point about leasehold. It could probably be lumped in with the problem of private renting as well. The people / company that own the building have no incentive to upgrade its thermal performance.
Some of the stuff your freeholder was saying makes a bit of sense, there sounds like the potential for a continuity of insulation problem and cold spots. Also its not like cavity fill hasn't caused some problems in some buildings. The whole thing though mainly reads like a list of excuses because its easier for them to say no because its no skin of their nose.
I bet if you were proposing to put some new expensive windows in (and pay for them) they would have quite happily said yes (in fact it was likely part of the lease agreement). How windows are not considered part of teh fabric of the building yet the inside of a cavity wall is beyond me.
The situation is pretty fucked and the chances of this getting resolved seems miles away.
It's a cartoon version of this:Is that really a piece of academic work?
It's a cartoon version of this:
View attachment 289780
from this:
Discourses of climate delay | Global Sustainability | Cambridge Core
Discourses of climate delay - Volume 3www.cambridge.org
i went along to a local 'big green week' meeting yesterday eve and there was a woman there who is very involved in extinction rebellion, she's in her 70s and tiny and keeps glueing herself to stuff and getting arrested. I was really impressed and moved by some of the things she said.
She told me about what it felt like to do a solitary protest recently just her self alone sat in the road stopping traffic, waiting for the police to come, ordinary people just trying to get somewhere shouting at her what the hell do you think you'll achieve etc, and how the thought process was that she went through to decide that this was an action she felt was worth doing. Changed my mind about a few things, which is always a good feeling.
You'd have thought that xr would give a shit about pensioners nicked, prosecuted and convicted for actions on xr demonstrations. But I've seen no evidence they do and quite a bit to the contrary: of the pensioners I know who've been prosecuted for xr stuff not one of them was supported by that organisation, legally financially or morallyYeah, for all the bleating on about young people etc etc. a significant percentage of people doing stuff as XR are people in their 60s and 70s.
yep its one of the things i noticed from the photos, lots of older people. This one yesterday was very what have i got to lose, my kids are too old to even be embarrassed of me anymore.Yeah, for all the bleating on about young people etc etc. a significant percentage of people doing stuff as XR are people in their 60s and 70s.
If only it was just about visual appearance, then it would be easy as a mindset shift. There is some serious barriers to retrofitting insulation onto existing buildings.
Still, sounds like my job will be busy and I'm in the right industry.
You'd have thought that xr would give a shit about pensioners nicked, prosecuted and convicted for actions on xr demonstrations. But I've seen no evidence they do and quite a bit to the contrary: of the pensioners I know who've been prosecuted for xr stuff not one of them was supported by that organisation, legally financially or morally
Maybe reread the post to which I was replying.Why is the fact they're pensioners relevant? If XR's support is lacking it's irrelevant who for surely?
They live in tents so what the fuck are they on about. The only insulation they know’s in their sleeping bags; silly bl**dy cuntsI believe you'll find they're all jobless, feckless crusties too high on the marijuana cigarettes brought with our tax money to know what day it is, the dirty unwashed bastards.
Was she the inspiration for you super glueing your fingers together the other day?i went along to a local 'big green week' meeting yesterday eve and there was a woman there who is very involved in extinction rebellion, she's in her 70s and tiny and keeps glueing herself to stuff and getting arrested. I was really impressed and moved by some of the things she said.
…
will the Little Fantasist be there to defend the lorry gates or is he still inside?They all fucked off to Dover today to stop lorry's coming in or something.