lazythursday
Averagely-Known Member
Well are people really going to accept not being able to heat their houses? every option has a downside. No insulation + heat pump = lack of comfort. No insulation + hydrogen = much bigger bills. And hydrogen may not even be an option depending on how the technology matures.I'm less convinced. With regard to internal insulation are people really going to accept losing that much floor space? To bring them up to modern standards will need a hefty slab of insulation unless of course you use a PIR or PUR insulation but if you did that you'd be lining your house with combustible materials.
There is no easy overall solution to this but Solar PV is an easy win. Still, with temperatures hotting up maybe we won't need so much insulation.
What is needed is some kind of expert service that can come and assess your house (from all angles, including suitability for solar PV etc) and issue you a whole-house plan, that can be done in stages or all at once. And new long term financing (and subsidies) that can make that less painful. And that service to manage the contractors etc for you and do quality checks. Or even pay for the whole house upgrade on the basis that you are locked into a long term energy service contract (like the Netherlands Energiesprong model). I know quite a lot about all this and I still struggle to work out what I am best doing to my house - it really isn't good enough to have a grant scheme where the householder is expected to work it all out for themselves.
And yeah, it has to be marketed right as a massive upgrade, a desirable modernisation - at the moment people clearly don't see the benefit (and right now there isn't one, given the cheapness and availability of gas. These old houses with their lovely heritage features may be much less desirable post-gas...)