This is typical of anti-car propagandists. Cite some harm and claim total elimination of the chosen target as the best and most desirable option, and that such elimination is viable and the method to achieve it is effective (e.g. buses4all).
However when the detail is analsyed, the aim (eradication) is found to unachievable and undesirable, and the method half-baked and unworkable. The benefits of the target are ignored, and elimination not justified by the harms caused.
The project's aim is to help protect ecosystems and native red squirrel populations.
www.bbc.co.uk