Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Entirely unashamed anti car propaganda, and the more the better.

It’s almost as if the large proportion of London’s pedestrians behaving irresponsibly could have something to do with their being injured or killed by buses and other vehicles more often than in cities where pedestrians perform the basic function of looking before crossing… :hmm:
 
Last edited:
This is what happens when people get it into their heads you should cycle everywhere.

A thread of dangerous and foolish cyclists delighting in how they endanger themselves and others:

 
More irresponsible behaviour from the elderly, who only have this coming if they insist on living in dangerous houses that are placed in the path of out of control vehicles. A speed limit wouldn't have prevented this, because the driver was probably using speed to get out of danger during an overtaking manoeuvre. What would have prevented this would have been to demolish the house.
 
More irresponsible behaviour from the elderly, who only have this coming if they insist on living in dangerous houses that are placed in the path of out of control vehicles. A speed limit wouldn't have prevented this, because the driver was probably using speed to get out of danger during an overtaking manoeuvre. What would have prevented this would have been to demolish the house.

Don't be silly, it's obviously the car driver's fault and this means we must ban cars. Everything that ever causes damage, injury or death must be banned.
 


The car paradigm destroyed communities and cities. It is more than time to mend the errors of decades of bad decisions.


Beeching did it for the community-dividing railways that were destructively splurged everywhere in the 19th century, perhaps we need another bold hero like him to tear up our roads.
 
Beeching did it for the community-dividing railways that were destructively splurged everywhere in the 19th century, perhaps we need another bold hero like him to tear up our roads.
Correct. Transport policy at that time moved traffic from one mode with disruptive infrastructure to an even more disruptive one. We now need heros to correct that mistake and move back to the least bad option. Each time you post on this thread it brings this message closer to a potential hero.
 
Correct. Transport policy at that time moved traffic from one mode with disruptive infrastructure to an even more disruptive one. We now need heros to correct that mistake and move back to the least bad option. Each time you post on this thread it brings this message closer to a potential hero.

I'm glad you admit that railways are disruptive and are consequently against HS2. The least disruptive infrastructure is of course none, people will have to walk everywhere across muddy fields, like in the good olden days.
 
I'm glad you admit that railways are disruptive and are consequently against HS2. The least disruptive infrastructure is of course none, people will have to walk everywhere across muddy fields, like in the good olden days.
My extremist position is that we should build transport infrastructure that strikes a balance between allowing everyone to move around freely and easily, and minimising the extent to which people's living environment is dominated by such infrastructure.

Of course you take the more moderate position that smashing cars into elderly people's houses is a fair price to pay in return for allowing those who can afford BMWs to get everywhere they want to without having to interact with the lower classes, and consequently you are against the 92 year old woman using up taxpayer resources by being taken to hospital.
 
My extremist position is that we should build transport infrastructure that strikes a balance between allowing everyone to move around freely and easily, and minimising the extent to which people's living environment is dominated by such infrastructure.

Of course you take the more moderate position that smashing cars into elderly people's houses is a fair price to pay in return for allowing those who can afford BMWs to get everywhere they want to without having to interact with the lower classes, and consequently you are against the 92 year old woman using up taxpayer resources by being taken to hospital.
Quite. It's a national scandal how often elderly people's houses get smashed into. We ought to start a petition.
 
It's a national scandal

I'll sign it if you think it will help.
 
Back
Top Bottom