liquidindian
Hello
Per mile?More pedestrians are killed by buses than motorbikes
Per mile?More pedestrians are killed by buses than motorbikes
Per mile?
I'm convinced. Buses are incredibly dangerous, and anything more dangerous than buses should be outlawed.
View attachment 298549
Yes but you've really helped with some broader questions too. Thank you.The question
I like this. Maybe big cars that can carry between 40 and 80 people at once.It would be safest if everyone drove everywhere in their car.
I like this. Maybe big cars that can carry between 40 and 80 people at once.
I’m not saying all BMW drivers are thick as mince, but the evidence does keep presenting itself
View attachment 298614
edcraw drives a Beamer !I’m not saying all BMW drivers are thick as mince, but the evidence does keep presenting itself
View attachment 298614
A thread of dangerous and foolish cyclists delighting in how they endanger themselves and others:
More irresponsible behaviour from the elderly, who only have this coming if they insist on living in dangerous houses that are placed in the path of out of control vehicles. A speed limit wouldn't have prevented this, because the driver was probably using speed to get out of danger during an overtaking manoeuvre. What would have prevented this would have been to demolish the house.
The car paradigm destroyed communities and cities. It is more than time to mend the errors of decades of bad decisions.
Driving Standards thread that way —->Gran, 92, seriously injured after BMW ploughs into living room as she slept
"All I could see was devastation. It was frightening."www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
The car paradigm destroyed communities and cities. It is more than time to mend the errors of decades of bad decisions.
Correct. Transport policy at that time moved traffic from one mode with disruptive infrastructure to an even more disruptive one. We now need heros to correct that mistake and move back to the least bad option. Each time you post on this thread it brings this message closer to a potential hero.Beeching did it for the community-dividing railways that were destructively splurged everywhere in the 19th century, perhaps we need another bold hero like him to tear up our roads.
Correct. Transport policy at that time moved traffic from one mode with disruptive infrastructure to an even more disruptive one. We now need heros to correct that mistake and move back to the least bad option. Each time you post on this thread it brings this message closer to a potential hero.
My extremist position is that we should build transport infrastructure that strikes a balance between allowing everyone to move around freely and easily, and minimising the extent to which people's living environment is dominated by such infrastructure.I'm glad you admit that railways are disruptive and are consequently against HS2. The least disruptive infrastructure is of course none, people will have to walk everywhere across muddy fields, like in the good olden days.
I tried to slow down and follow the signs to that thread but instead stamped on the accelerator by mistake and slammed into a house.Driving Standards thread that way —->
Quite. It's a national scandal how often elderly people's houses get smashed into. We ought to start a petition.My extremist position is that we should build transport infrastructure that strikes a balance between allowing everyone to move around freely and easily, and minimising the extent to which people's living environment is dominated by such infrastructure.
Of course you take the more moderate position that smashing cars into elderly people's houses is a fair price to pay in return for allowing those who can afford BMWs to get everywhere they want to without having to interact with the lower classes, and consequently you are against the 92 year old woman using up taxpayer resources by being taken to hospital.
It's a national scandal