a_chap
When the world came apart, where were you?
Should be equal by stumps. Build a lead of 250-300 by tomorrow arvo and bobs ya uncle.
A lead of 300?
So England to declare with a score something over, er, 850...!
Should be equal by stumps. Build a lead of 250-300 by tomorrow arvo and bobs ya uncle.
Didn't know he flew helicopters in the Falklands.Remember when Cook batted all day and didn't even sweat?
TO be fair the commentators are talking in something like the same hyperbolic terms.A lead of 300?
So England to declare with a score something over, er, 850...!
The most realistic chance of a win must be something like England getting a lead around 100+ and then getting Pakistan out cheaply on a deteriorating pitch to leave themselves a very small chase.
A lead of 300?
So England to declare with a score something over, er, 850...!
That would leave Pakistan needing less than 120.Declare at lunch. Bash 180 in the morning session. They'll need five sessions on this pitch.
That would leave Pakistan needing less than 120.
Aside from only needing 120, you'd, give them 5 sessions to do it? Sorry, not making my point very clearly, that would give them a chance to build a lead and control the pace of the match.
Yeah, but I'm even worse. For a moment, post 822, I forgot this was still the first innings.I've been drinking at a horrendous work do. Gimme a break here.
If you're quick, you could edit and add "to make England bat again". No one will notice.Yeah, but I'm even worse. For a moment, post 822, I forgot this was still the first innings.
All I'll say is that people were saying exactly that at this stage in games last time England were in Pakistan.Pitches in Pakistan can and do fall apart, but I can't see it on this occasion - not enough to go from probably 20 wickets in nearly 4 days to a result.
I'd love to be proved wrong though, would make for some finish.
Next into the equation is personal milestones vs maximum time to win the match. Get both to 300 by tea and declare?