See the penultimate paragraph of post #18206what answer and who is "they"?
fuck the swp, then and now
they were the same when i was in uni in the 90's, co opting and sucking life out of causes and movements, and "building", still the same shit
Fees never mentioned in 87/88easily said, but it certainly wasn't the Labour lot at our Uni in the late 80's / 90's breathing life into any 'causes' or 'movement's', more like chasing their own tails up bureaucratic cul de sacs - SWP / SWSS on other hand were v proactive, and willing to get stuck in ( eg : anti Alton Abortion Bill, anti fees, incl. decent little attempt to storm Parliament 87/ 88 ish ?)
Fees never mentioned in 87/88
loans, + with video evidence
Loans, yes. The battle of Westminster Bridge
"The SWP are mostly uni students" - where have you been for the last four years? If anything, I'd say the SP has overtaken them in the student stakes [which IME is saying something]. At a guess and from limited local and demo/Marxism experience I'd put their average age somewhere in the 40's.
Marxism starts tomorrow. Back in the 90s it was massive. Now it's smaller than the London lib dem Friday drinksThat loans one was the first big demo I'd been on. Lots of disappointments after that...
It seems like the SWP had lots of younger members until a few years ago? Was there some kind of incident which made them all leave?
Their bite has become incredibly feeble, but their bark is as loud as ever.Marxism starts tomorrow. Back in the 90s it was massive. Now it's smaller than the London lib dem Friday drinks
Their bite has always been feebleTheir bite has become incredibly feeble, but their bark is as loud as ever.
Yeah but you can barely feel any pressure there at all now.Their bite has always been feeble
I never felt any pressure from the SWP anywayYeah but you can barely feel any pressure there at all now.
Interesting that this article is written by Comrade Delta & co; D ream Deferre d & has similar position as SWP/SUTR/ UAF !Searchlight has also joined the chorus of panic with this analysis (linked below) of how the far right is relaunching itself through FLA, despite the fact they were uninvited. What it fails to do, like the SWP and the other article linked above, is understand that ordinary people are much more concerned about islamic terrorism than one off attacks by far righters, so not really pushing the murder of a labour MP a year after the event and with three successive islamic attacks in a row with many victims is not tantamount to , well, nazism.
The football lads thing has quite obviously been motivated by the heroic defence put up by the Millwall fan who took on the three jihadists in Borough market, a selfless act which saved lives and should be recognized, as should that of the spanish banker who died trying to stop that same attack.
I think Searchlight and SWP are panic mongering and out of touch with the football crowd. Maybe they just don't have anything else to write about these days? The standuptoracism article, which repeats the mantra that "protests against extremism are an attack on all muslims, describes the EDL as a nazi organization, when techincally...
People need to stop equating real concerns with an agenda. By that I mean FLA and people in general not EDL.
A second warning for antifascists: thousands on the streets of London as far right reorganises
It seems like the SWP had lots of younger members until a few years ago? Was there some kind of incident which made them all leave?
I've offered an answer to that - do we see many more successful campaigns where they aren't?
that's good. I looked and didn't see, and came away thinking that another Great British Tradition had declined.though Saturday before last I did see people who had deliberately torn off the "Socialist Worker" from the top.
Unfortunately this doesn't appear to be true !Marxism starts tomorrow. Back in the 90s it was massive. Now it's smaller than the London lib dem Friday drinks
Did any political organisation, other than possibly Labour, have a base amongst the residents? Maybe their response for the march was over the top, but there's good reason for lefties to get involved.SWP placards on the Grenfell march was a f*cking joke, they just make mugs of themselves in those situations, no base amongst the residents, it just looks like naked, middle class lefty opportunism
Did any political organisation, other than possibly Labour, have a base amongst the residents? Maybe their response for the march was over the top, but there's good reason for lefties to get involved.
The author (well one of) is definitely the most interesting part of the article. It lead me to look at the DD site. It's not bad. If I didn't know of and have an opinion about one of the lead contributors, I'd probably bookmark it (or whatever young people do nowadays).Interesting that this article is written by Comrade Delta & co; D ream Deferre d & has similar position as SWP/SUTR/ UAF !
It's been rumoured that he is close to top figures in S WP such as Judith Orr.
Had the impression that in some way they had learned the lessons of ANAL II under Julie Waterson with regards receiving 'intelligence' from Searchlies with UAF, especially after disagreements between Searchlight & Hope Not Hate a while later, distancing themselves somewhat from them.
Out of desperation and loss of credibility in dealing with anti racism/fascism that is generally even reluctantly accepted among their new supporters; mainly through SUTR's newly gained backing by Momentum and others on Labour Left/Centre Left; some sort of arching agreement between SWP & Searchlight is being sort ?
" Publishing articles by Martin Smith is an unusual way to cosy up to the SWP - they'd much rather never hear his name again. I don't doubt there's still a few of his friends at all levels of the organisation, but even four years on all the members I've mentioned it to are firmly against any attempt at rapprochement."The author (well one of) is definitely the most interesting part of the article. It lead me to look at the DD site. It's not bad. If I didn't know of and have an opinion about one of the lead contributors, I'd probably bookmark it (or whatever young people do nowadays).
You're reaching a bit on a putative Searchlight/SWP connection. Publishing articles by Martin Smith is an unusual way to cosy up to the SWP - they'd much rather never hear his name again. I don't doubt there's still a few of his friends at all levels of the organisation, but even four years on all the members I've mentioned it to are firmly against any attempt at rapprochement.
BTW, "desperation and loss of credibility in dealing with anti racism/fascism" isn't something I'm seeing. Care to elaborate?
Again with the gnomic assertions. Are you asking or telling? If the former, already answered, if the latter, please explain.This is not altogether true is it !
There's plenty of evidence of UAF/SUTR and SWP in general being less than successful and pissing off genuine campaigners; suggest you talk to activists within Kent Anti Racism Network and how they operated around migrants/refugees campaigns.Again with the gnomic assertions. Are you asking or telling? If the former, already answered, if the latter, please explain.
You still haven't answered my last question about the "air of desperation." Any chance?
My comments were mostly relevant to this thread (i.e. relations between antifascist groups). If you want a sectarian chat about the SWP Expulsions I'm not that interested.
Did any political organisation, other than possibly Labour, have a base amongst the residents? Maybe their response for the march was over the top, but there's good reason for lefties to get involved.
Do i get the gist that you are not particularly keen on anarchists?It wasn’t me that made (still) unfounded claims about SWP and Searchlight getting together, nor did I post a 1hr20min video of the Marxism rally. Derailing FFS!
The AFN report of Dover is interesting for what it doesn’t say. You’d think 150 “locals and AFN” were the only anti-fascists in Dover that day. Not the story my kids tell, which includes an anti-fascist photographer being hunted down, kicked and beaten with a scaffolding pole. Similarly, at Liverpool when AFN gets kettled and breaks out it’s heroic, but when UAF does, it’s pathetic. Everyone does biased reporting.
But in the interests of not derailing the thread too much I’ll be brief rather than answer point by point.
The SWP aren’t what you’d call big, but they do a lot of campaigning (not “genuine” campaigning, of course) which puts them in touch with a lot of people. Inevitably they piss some off. So what? I’m sure the SP would get a similar reaction if they could focus on anything other than the next election. Anarchists are different though, they never fuck up. No no, that’s not quite right, they never have to take responsibility.
As for the Martin Smith scandal (BTW please stop being pretentious and use his name – Comrade Delta was the invention of Socialist Unity), the SWP got it spectacularly wrong at every stage (bar, possibly, the last). I don’t know enough about the SP to say for certain, but I’d be surprised if they hadn’t fucked up the odd internal disciplinary. I do, however, know anarchists well enough to say they routinely cover up cases of sexual assault and rape, but no big fuss because there’s never anyone to take responsibility for their mess.
Some of my best friends are anarchist.Do i get the gist that you are not particularly keen on anarchists?
AFN now are all Anarchists ?Do i get the gist that you are not particularly keen on anarchists?