time and a place for black block, other times - as you say - best to blend in.Btw wouldn't be seen dead in black block Meself, clobber all the way, which on one occasion of havin it with an edl'er a load of other edl thought the boyo gettin done was a leftie so joined in, another time two lads came up to a group of us to tell us where the reds were, that didn't end too well for them!
Sorry pal, mostly to yours!
Regardless some very valid observations / criticisms of the state of antifacsism at the moment!Just briefly I'm honest that I'm a peripheral character on the scene, been on a few actions in the south west and north west (>10) most of which weren't AFN callouts. My judgements were coming from being a relative outsider to AFN looking in on it as a potential thing to get involved with. I can see where i've mixed up the AFN with generic antifa and I've let a lot of misconceptions about AFN go because of this...
My original post was what the AFN looks like from the outside to me and people like like me.
It wouldn't be that a perfectly good chance to denounce the world as a bunch of middle class wankers has degenerated into a reasonable and potentially useful conversation has made you take your ball home would it butchers?I wanted to do a thread that was a bit more than a title. That might be your standard of thread but not mine. There are things to discuss so a) getting them right and b) saying them are rather important.
lol
It wouldn't be that a perfectly good chance to denounce the world as a bunch of middle class wankers has degenerated into a reasonable and potentially useful conversation has made you take your ball home would it butchers?
Regardless some very valid observations / criticisms of the state of antifacsism at the moment!
Perhaps i was a little harsh on the activist i pointed out and name calling is out of order so I apologise for that. But we've all got to be honest about our willingness and ability to take people on physically and that activist clearly wasn't willing. They put themselves in danger out of naivety rather than bravery, so I don't think it's right to applaud them just for being there. In my opinion they contradicted our M.O. and damaged our cause by being there. Fighting is a nasty business - the idea is to smash or to intimidate the opposition into having second thoughts. All that activist did by being in the thick of it when they clearly weren't up for it was provide an easy, visible and documentable little victory for the fash - gave them an ego boost rather than the slapping down and humiliation needed. Pride and 'standing your ground' in the green street sense is clearly a load of bollocks at the end of the day, but it's how the fash idealise themselves and we've got to take that away from them.
I think your original comment was OK, certainly a good point to start a discussion. I finally watched the "angry white and proud" documentary about some EDL hangers on the other night and there was a similar scene in that of some black clad skinny guys getting floored outside a pub in London on the same day as some anti-racist conference.
I'd also like to add that I am pretty shit at fighting myself but went along to the Hyde Park/Blood and Honour confrontation whenever that was (89?). Mainly because I was pissed off with Nazis organising near my college. It was pretty scary, but I thought I was up for it. I realised the error of my ways when I froze up completely when two boneheads came running towards me. Luckily they were taken out by some heroic types and I quickly realised that I was essentially there to make up the numbers - and that staying out of the way was the safest option for me and for the more forthright people who were doing the necessary.
It became clear to me that I didn't really have the skills necessary for the situation. Perhaps I could have developed them, but I certainly didn't want to be one of those people who talks the talk but then flees on the heels and lets people down.
I think you are being harsh on the 'gimp'. As I said before you can't make a judgment on three minutes of footage. So they put their hands up - in some circumstances this can be exactly the right thing to do - some self defence courses even teach it as 'the fence'. They got knocked down and just like the song says - they got back up again. They were there - you were not. Fair play I say.
" In my opinion they contradicted our M.O. and damaged our cause by being there. Fighting is a nasty business - the idea is to smash or to intimidate the opposition into having second thoughts." - nice idea, but it doesn't always pan out that way. What is our M.O by the way?
The squaddist stuff you are talking about - well sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. AFA were a brilliantly successful organisation - in a specific time and place. Most of their work was done against a far-right that was organising in a very traditional way - paper sales, doorknocking, meetings in pubs etc. That gave an opportunity for a well organised group to turn up, outnumber the fash three to one, hurt them and then leave.
What you're talking about now are groups that organise online and can muster hundreds to take over a town centre without the need to have public meetings. These groups are not particularly vulnerable to squaddist tactics. So what if twenty of your mates leap out of a pub and twat half a dozen EDL - how is that going to impact on their future political development? Mass opposition with a physical component and a refusal to organise with the authorities has been the AFN remedy so far - and when it's worked, it's worked well. AFN ers have also travelled to steward (not officially) other more mainstream demos in towns where the fash are likely to outnumber the fluffy counter-demo - so as to be able to defend it when necessary.
Think about the "Battle of Waterloo" - the jewel in AFA's crown. I didn't go but mates of mine did and they were very much as Fozzie Bear says - "there to make up the numbers". That was because in an effort to stop 500 skinheads from attending a gig AFA had to call on everyone who could make it. 500 is actually a pretty average demo size for the EDL - so we're only trying to do the same thing.
It wouldn't be that a perfectly good chance to denounce the world as a bunch of middle class wankers has degenerated into a reasonable and potentially useful conversation has made you take your ball home would it butchers?
Re. far right organisation online:
It's really interesting. The fash have been targeted online in ways that resemble mass opposition, such as explicit counter sites or piss taking pages (I'm thinking of 'Britain Furst' rather than OTAN here), and ways that resemble "squadism', hacking FB pages, events and external websites to make online organising precarious BUT neither tactic seems to have any relationship with the support the far right receive online or their ability to pull numbers in real life.
Re. far right organisation online:
It's really interesting. The fash have been targeted online in ways that resemble mass opposition, such as explicit counter sites or piss taking pages (I'm thinking of 'Britain Furst' rather than OTAN here), and ways that resemble "squadism', hacking FB pages, events and external websites to make online organising precarious BUT neither tactic seems to have any relationship with the support the far right receive online or their ability to pull numbers in real life.
I'm no Luddite (I work part time in IT...), but it indicates that the internet isn't as big of a factor as is often assumed.
On a side note I recommend all anti-fascists clue up on digital security. Use TOR, a VPN and change hard disks (destroying the old ones) regularly. This isn't tinfoil hat stuff, it's the digital equivalent of masking up on a demo.
I'm dyslexic. I wasn't endorsing those pages at all.Attacking them for their supposed appalling literacy is frowned upon on here, hopefully for obvious reasons.
pointed out britain furst above Otan not because it's less snobbish but because it has a following of over 100k whereas OTAN managed about 100.Attacking them for their supposed appalling literacy is frowned upon on here, hopefully for obvious reasons.
I'm dyslexic. I wasn't endorsing those pages at all.
Then people who for whatever reason didn't get the educational support they needed at school or can't access it in adulthood, who can't afford to visit the dentist, who work particular kinds of jobs or can't find a job at all, or dress in a particular way because it's quite fucking smart actually are thinking about finding answers to the problems they face, political answers. Then they see that shit and think the 'left' is for 'middle class wankers,' mocking them, their families, their friends, their homes, their class experience and not taking any interest in the serious problems they face. People then won't touch anything it organises around with a barge-pole, lost, gone... I don't and I dress like a cunt and take good care of my teeth (coffee and cigarettes aside). Meanwhile the fascists...
Why you always on about class? Why is it so important to you? So central?It wouldn't be that a perfectly good chance to denounce the world as a bunch of middle class wankers has degenerated into a reasonable and potentially useful conversation has made you take your ball home would it butchers?
Me too. That's exactly the sort of crude reduction of what i have ever said on here and criticisms of what the proper official anti-fascists (ownership currently in brighton apparently) that have made this thread a joke.wld be interested to see a post from Butchers where he "denounce(s) the world as a bunch of middle class wankers" , literally or other wise, maybe I missed them ?
This is exactly why i didn't think it would be worth the candle btwIt wouldn't be that a perfectly good chance to denounce the world as a bunch of middle class wankers has degenerated into a reasonable and potentially useful conversation has made you take your ball home would it butchers?
I've already apologised for the name calling. Totally out of order. I hold my hands up.
Talking of holding hands up, you're right - but there's a difference between a guard and a don't hurt me. I made a judgement on 3 mins of video footage because it's all I see of actions I'm not on and it's all that potential recruits see whatsoever. The whole video is legitimising propaganda for the fash - 'violent commies attacked us brave patriots for loving our country but they're not so brave on their own and we fought them off'.
The M.O. is ideologically and (where necessary) physically confronting fascism, which we probably all agree on - ex-AFA, AFN, 'antifa', whatever.
Re. Squadism: Far right groups still have leaders and visible characters who do a lot of leg work organising PAs, speakers, police liaison, stewarding, transport. We all know who the big twat/head steward with 'EDL' on the back of his head is for example. If they're not there then the organisation crumbles. With other groups, aside from their sensationalised Facebook presence, Britain First in particular do the traditional leafleting malarky (and a bit of poppy scamming on the side). When they mobilised 2-3 activists in a lot of places to 'protect' poppy sellers it turned a lot of heads their way in my community.
Mass opposition is patchy. Newcastle recently was brilliant for anti-fascism as a whole (N.E. AFN mobilised a mass of about 25/2000 marchers...) but there was no mass opposition to the far right bonanza in Rotherham, which is where right wing politics are currently centred and where the white working class happen to be really pissed off and most susceptible to fascist influence. If you want to talk about wider political aims rather than just generic opposition AFN should probably start here. "How is that going to impact on their future political development?" - Time will tell but it won't be pretty.