Tom Nairn, considered one of the key thinkers of the (British) New Left. From 1962, with Perry Anderson in New Left Review. Nairn in his published work:The Enchanted Glass (1988), a serious modern investigations into the British Monarchy, made reference to the state using reactionary forces to be brought into view to be used as a threat, conveniently built up as potential attack dogs to counter the growth and influence of progressive movements, usually of the left in times of crisis. Used as part of the states resources of checks and balances.
The EDL appear to be the reactionary force being used in a similar fashion at present. It's no surprise then to see, increasingly so, these reactionary forces turning up at meetings organised by left groups, using intimidatory tactics, including disruption, threats oif and actual violence.
Expect more of the same and also be prepared for a possible escalation in this tactic, as the current crisis deepens. It could get ugly, so security needs to be stepped up as a priority. Some are so lax on this it borders on amateur night at the wheel tappers and shunters club open mic night, with Orville the duck appointed cheif steward.
The whole scheme could also back-fire on those in control, losing the leash to be let loose completely are there other forces able to pick it up? I doubt it. Letting the attack dogs roam off the leash is a dangerous option and not one favoured by anyone least of all the authorities. The consequences have the potential to be dire and that would not be allowed to happen.
In a recent meeting, with Peter Hain in attendance, people attending this meeting were instructed to remove the batteries from all the mobile phones that people had bought with them into the meeting. Some may find it extraordinary that an ex minister and presently an elected representative, an MP and a member of the opposition, felt it necessarily for this to happen, believing that there was a possibilty that the meeting itself was being monitored by certain forces.
Could these forces be the "secret state" David Shayler, the ex MI5 officer, who was imprisoned, referred to in the book he co-wrote with his ex partner, Annie Machon, another former intelligence officer.
Even the Queen herself has in the past mentioned "dark forces" operating in this country. These forces are reportedly accountable to no one and appear to act with impunity, who are above the law, using any means necessary, including killing people, even those who are innocent bystanders have been victims with some being killed during operations (Libya is mentioned where innocent lives were lost) and referred to as "collateral damage".
Democracy my arse seems an appropriate term with this knowledge uppermost, of a serious, systemic fault, appearing beneficial to anti-democratic forces built into the system. This in stark contrast to how the niave believe it to be, that is, fair and benign, serving the interests of the population as a whole. Something likened to Disneyland, but in reality can be easily become like the Village, with the character of prisoner, but lacking any quaint facade and definately no one with the Number 6.badge pinned to a well tailored blazer. This is no series with a walk on part. Not even I'm afraid a well known actor in cameo.
Room 101 on the other hand is more likely, updated with the latest implements of horror nightmares are made off.
Or do people think this to be a load of old bollocks?
Consider carefully before replying to this particular question, as I recognise it's open to be ridiculed, or abused for comedy effect.
I do expect some agreement to the load of old bollocks comment I've posted, that can be replied to if you are in agreement with this, but do try to restrain yourself from being a complete arse when considering the question. I expect some will view this as a fun option and there is a real possibility for some to take an opportunity to act like blithering idiots after reading the question. This is Urban75 afterall, with a fair share of comedians in residence. No offence meant.
