You have your lines confused. The Northern low-level line is not the one that will be carrying the extension - it will be the Southern high-level line.I don't understand the thinking really as to why the 4th platform at Brixton can't be built, and the third (middle) bought back into use.
The Victoria-bound platform overhangs the pavement and is up on stilts.
On the other side, it would overhang the little market area so it's not even like it's going to close a road or anything - height of vehicles shouldn't be any more of a problem any more than it is the other side of the station.
I can't see how doing something similar would cost 60 million.
You have your lines confused. The Northern low-level line is not the one that will be carrying the extension - it will be the Southern high-level line.
...it was never more than a proposed station...
A junction to the east would have to come after the chord onto the thameslink route, whose trains are on the northern pair of tracks until that point. Immediately after the chord, the track runs over loughborough junction. If we want a station there, we can't put a junction in as well. In fact, building a junction here would be just as difficult as building a station. beyond there, we have the chord on the other side to deal with, after which the lines start to diverge vertically.Understand.
Is it not possible to put in some pointwork to the east so trains can cross from the high level to the low level lines, and build the platform over the market by the leisure centre as I mentioned, or are the heights so different?
Is it simply a capacity issue?
So many of south london's railways are poorly layed out, and things are complicated by each network wanting a west end and city terminus.
Of course they're going to safeguard land...a bit more than that; according to Councillor Toren Smith...
"I can confirm that Lambeth Council is proposing to safeguard the land any future East London Line station will require at Brixton (in the forthcoming Local Development Framework) so that it is able to be built without conflict from any new development."
I reckon if I go on the Antique's Roadshow in 10 years time, it might be worth as much as £2.25 by then.Worth £1.25 of anyone's money.
Can anyone find timetables for this station? I'm curious as to what kind of service it once had.
It's a shame it's gone because the station would have been very useful for me.Thinking about it, it's only ever been on the SLL, so probably no more than 4 trains an hour each way to Victoria/London Bridge.
East Brixton station was on the South London line to and from Victoria and London Bridge was it not? I am also perplexed as the why the East London Line Phase 2 to Clapham Junctions will not have a station at Brixton, whether it be Brixton mainline station or a re-opened East Brixton. To stop on the high-level tracks at Brixton would mean excellent connections to the Victoria Line. It just makes sense IMHO.
This was discussed a while ago in a long thread; it all boils down to the usual problem, someone has to spend money building a station in an awkward location and that will affect the shareholders profits, which any development is primarily for rather than to serve people living in the area.
Can anyone find timetables for this station? I'm curious as to what kind of service it once had.
That would be ace! When was the first/last trains?From the 1974/5 BR all lines timetable:
It was only served by the London Bridge - Denmark Hill - Victoria "wall of death" line.
Two trains per hour in each direction, closed on Sundays.
The 1,300+ page format of the timetable doesn't really lend itself to use of a scanner - I'll see what I can do about photographing the relevant page if you like.